CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Carnac(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PPfold(seed) & Carnac(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PPfold(seed) Carnac(seed)
MCC 0.116 > 0.097
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.062 ± 0.090 > 0.037 ± 0.082
Sensitivity 0.026 > 0.009
Positive Predictive Value 0.524 < 1.000
Total TP 11 > 4
Total TN 61125 < 61142
Total FP 47 > 0
Total FP CONTRA 0 = 0
Total FP INCONS 10 > 0
Total FP COMP 37 > 0
Total FN 412 < 419
P-value 9.19029237474e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PPfold(seed) and Carnac(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(seed) and Carnac(seed)).

  2. Comparison of performance of PPfold(seed) and Carnac(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(seed) and Carnac(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PPfold(seed) and Carnac(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(seed) and Carnac(seed)).

  4. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PPfold(seed) and Carnac(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(seed) and Carnac(seed)).

^top





Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 11
Total TN 61125
Total FP 47
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 10
Total FP COMP 37
Total FN 412
Total Scores
MCC 0.116
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.062 ± 0.090
Sensitivity 0.026
Positive Predictive Value 0.524
Nr of predictions 12

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.47 0.30 0.75 6 1532 2 0 2 0 14
3RKF_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2211 0 0 0 0 34
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3916 0 0 0 0 42
3W3S_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4753 0 0 0 0 40
3ZEX_C 0.20 0.08 0.50 4 14188 22 0 4 18 48
4A1C_2 0.08 0.03 0.20 1 11776 23 0 4 19 32
4A1C_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7140 0 0 0 0 54
4AOB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4371 0 0 0 0 42
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1275 0 0 0 0 19
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1326 0 0 0 0 19
4FRG_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3486 0 0 0 0 32
4FRN_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5151 0 0 0 0 36

^top



Performance of Carnac(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Carnac(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 4
Total TN 61142
Total FP 0
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 0
Total FP COMP 0
Total FN 419
Total Scores
MCC 0.097
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.037 ± 0.082
Sensitivity 0.009
Positive Predictive Value 1.000
Nr of predictions 12

^top



2. Individual counts for Carnac(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.44 0.20 1.00 4 1536 0 0 0 0 16
3RKF_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2211 0 0 0 0 34
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3916 0 0 0 0 42
3W3S_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4753 0 0 0 0 40
3ZEX_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 14196 0 0 0 0 52
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 11781 0 0 0 0 33
4A1C_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7140 0 0 0 0 54
4AOB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4371 0 0 0 0 42
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1275 0 0 0 0 19
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1326 0 0 0 0 19
4FRG_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3486 0 0 0 0 32
4FRN_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5151 0 0 0 0 36

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.