CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ProbKnot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ProbKnot & Afold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ProbKnot Afold
MCC 0.535 > 0.521
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.680 ± 0.084 > 0.671 ± 0.082
Sensitivity 0.491 > 0.479
Positive Predictive Value 0.584 > 0.568
Total TP 1065 > 1040
Total TN 1375055 > 1375046
Total FP 826 < 863
Total FP CONTRA 105 < 106
Total FP INCONS 653 < 686
Total FP COMP 68 < 71
Total FN 1106 < 1131
P-value 3.85233844192e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ProbKnot and Afold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ProbKnot and Afold).

  2. Comparison of performance of ProbKnot and Afold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ProbKnot and Afold).

  3. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ProbKnot and Afold).

  4. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ProbKnot and Afold).

  5. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ProbKnot and Afold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ProbKnot and Afold).

  6. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ProbKnot and Afold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ProbKnot and Afold).

^top





Performance of ProbKnot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ProbKnot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1065
Total TN 1375055
Total FP 826
Total FP CONTRA 105
Total FP INCONS 653
Total FP COMP 68
Total FN 1106
Total Scores
MCC 0.535
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.680 ± 0.084
Sensitivity 0.491
Positive Predictive Value 0.584
Nr of predictions 60

^top



2. Individual counts for ProbKnot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KX8_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 845 0 0 0 0 2
2KXM_A - 0.78 0.70 0.88 7 343 1 0 1 0 3
2KZL_A - 0.83 0.74 0.93 14 1470 1 0 1 0 5
2L1F_B 0.98 0.96 1.00 24 2121 0 0 0 0 1
2L1F_A 0.98 0.96 1.00 23 2057 0 0 0 0 1
2L2K_A - 0.94 0.89 1.00 17 844 0 0 0 0 2
2L3C_B - 0.91 0.82 1.00 14 547 0 0 0 0 3
2L3E_A - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 583 1 0 0 1 1
2L3J_B 0.94 0.88 1.00 30 2455 0 0 0 0 4
2L5Z_A - 0.86 0.75 1.00 9 316 0 0 0 0 3
2L94_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 971 0 0 0 0 1
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
2LDL_A - 0.90 0.82 1.00 9 342 1 0 0 1 2
2LDT_A - 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 454 0 0 0 0 4
2LHP_A - 0.97 0.94 1.00 15 651 0 0 0 0 1
2LI4_A - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 2
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 343 2 0 0 2 0
2LK3_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 267 0 0 0 0 1
2LKR_A - 0.85 0.77 0.94 30 6073 4 0 2 2 9
2LQZ_A - 0.85 0.82 0.90 9 341 1 1 0 0 2
2LWK_A - 0.88 0.85 0.92 11 484 1 0 1 0 2
2XXA_G 0.26 0.24 0.29 10 5116 25 1 24 0 32
2YIE_Z - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 3 12 0 12
2YIE_X - 0.34 0.33 0.36 4 1367 7 2 5 0 8
3AKZ_H 0.73 0.75 0.72 21 2672 8 4 4 0 7
3AM1_B - 0.74 0.71 0.78 25 3208 7 1 6 0 10
3IYQ_A 0.28 0.31 0.26 29 60616 85 22 59 4 65
3IZ4_A 0.52 0.46 0.60 61 70774 46 6 35 5 71
3IZF_C 0.72 0.61 0.85 33 6864 6 0 6 0 21
3J0L_h - 0.77 0.65 0.90 28 6074 3 0 3 0 15
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1212 13 0 13 0 17
3J0L_1 - 0.76 0.63 0.92 12 1212 3 0 1 2 7
3J2C_O - 0.60 0.52 0.70 33 10249 15 0 14 1 30
3NDB_M - 0.77 0.69 0.88 42 9132 7 0 6 1 19
3NKB_B - 0.59 0.54 0.67 14 1995 7 0 7 0 12
3NMU_E - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 552 11 2 7 2 6
3NPB_A 0.72 0.61 0.85 28 6988 8 1 4 3 18
3O58_3 0.31 0.34 0.29 12 12362 41 4 25 12 23
3O58_2 0.76 0.76 0.76 29 7222 10 3 6 1 9
3OVS_D - 0.92 0.92 0.92 12 548 1 0 1 0 1
3P22_G - 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 730 1 0 0 1 1
3R4F_A - 0.96 0.92 1.00 23 2122 0 0 0 0 2
3RKF_A 0.73 0.59 0.91 20 2189 2 1 1 0 14
3SIU_F - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 372 0 0 0 0 5
3SN2_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 394 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.45 0.35 0.59 13 3138 9 1 8 0 24
3VJR_D - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 618 0 0 0 0 1
3W3S_B 0.89 0.80 1.00 32 4721 1 0 0 1 8
3ZEX_H - 0.19 0.18 0.19 7 9009 29 4 25 0 31
3ZEX_B - 0.29 0.26 0.33 146 1071940 307 34 260 13 412
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2620 11 2 6 3 12
3ZEX_D 0.77 0.67 0.89 33 6984 4 0 4 0 16
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21886 61 2 57 2 77
4A1C_2 0.13 0.15 0.12 5 11738 49 7 31 11 28
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4ATO_G - 0.32 0.30 0.38 3 520 5 1 4 0 7
4ENB_A 0.73 0.58 0.92 11 1263 1 1 0 0 8
4FNJ_A - 0.66 0.50 0.89 8 586 1 0 1 0 8
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 319 0 0 0 0 0

^top



Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1040
Total TN 1375046
Total FP 863
Total FP CONTRA 106
Total FP INCONS 686
Total FP COMP 71
Total FN 1131
Total Scores
MCC 0.521
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.671 ± 0.082
Sensitivity 0.479
Positive Predictive Value 0.568
Nr of predictions 60

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KX8_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 845 0 0 0 0 2
2KXM_A - 0.89 0.80 1.00 8 343 0 0 0 0 2
2KZL_A - 0.86 0.74 1.00 14 1471 0 0 0 0 5
2L1F_B 0.96 0.96 0.96 24 2120 1 0 1 0 1
2L1F_A 0.96 0.96 0.96 23 2056 1 0 1 0 1
2L2K_A - 0.94 0.89 1.00 17 844 0 0 0 0 2
2L3C_B - 0.91 0.82 1.00 14 547 0 0 0 0 3
2L3E_A - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 583 1 0 0 1 1
2L3J_B 0.94 0.88 1.00 30 2455 0 0 0 0 4
2L5Z_A - 0.86 0.75 1.00 9 316 0 0 0 0 3
2L94_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 971 0 0 0 0 1
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A 0.61 0.55 0.69 11 1524 6 0 5 1 9
2LDL_A - 0.90 0.82 1.00 9 342 1 0 0 1 2
2LDT_A - 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 454 0 0 0 0 4
2LHP_A - 0.97 0.94 1.00 15 651 0 0 0 0 1
2LI4_A - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 2
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 343 2 0 0 2 0
2LK3_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 267 0 0 0 0 1
2LKR_A - 0.93 0.87 1.00 34 6071 3 0 0 3 5
2LQZ_A - 0.85 0.82 0.90 9 341 1 1 0 0 2
2LWK_A - 0.75 0.69 0.82 9 485 2 0 2 0 4
2XXA_G 0.34 0.31 0.39 13 5118 20 1 19 0 29
2YIE_Z - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 16 3 12 1 12
2YIE_X - 0.36 0.33 0.40 4 1368 8 2 4 2 8
3AKZ_H 0.16 0.14 0.19 4 2680 17 2 15 0 24
3AM1_B - 0.72 0.66 0.79 23 3211 6 0 6 0 12
3IYQ_A 0.31 0.34 0.29 32 60616 82 23 55 4 62
3IZ4_A 0.48 0.45 0.51 59 70760 58 11 46 1 73
3IZF_C 0.66 0.57 0.76 31 6862 10 1 9 0 23
3J0L_h - 0.73 0.60 0.90 26 6076 5 0 3 2 17
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1210 15 1 14 0 17
3J0L_1 - 0.73 0.63 0.86 12 1211 3 0 2 1 7
3J2C_O - 0.58 0.49 0.69 31 10251 15 1 13 1 32
3NDB_M - 0.84 0.74 0.96 45 9133 3 0 2 1 16
3NKB_B - 0.59 0.54 0.67 14 1995 7 0 7 0 12
3NMU_E - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 553 10 1 7 2 6
3NPB_A 0.74 0.61 0.90 28 6990 5 0 3 2 18
3O58_3 0.34 0.34 0.34 12 12368 37 2 21 14 23
3O58_2 0.66 0.66 0.66 25 7222 14 4 9 1 13
3OVS_D - 0.80 0.77 0.83 10 549 2 0 2 0 3
3P22_G - 0.87 0.83 0.91 10 730 1 0 1 0 2
3R4F_A - 0.96 0.92 1.00 23 2122 0 0 0 0 2
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SIU_F - 0.85 0.73 1.00 8 370 0 0 0 0 3
3SN2_B 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 395 0 0 0 0 1
3U4M_B - 0.38 0.32 0.46 12 3134 14 0 14 0 25
3VJR_D - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 618 1 0 0 1 1
3W3S_B 0.50 0.45 0.56 18 4721 15 1 13 1 22
3ZEX_H - 0.18 0.18 0.18 7 9006 33 6 26 1 31
3ZEX_B - 0.29 0.26 0.32 147 1071922 322 35 276 11 411
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2617 12 2 9 1 12
3ZEX_D 0.72 0.61 0.86 30 6986 5 0 5 0 19
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21892 55 2 51 2 77
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11745 43 5 26 12 28
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4ATO_G - 0.32 0.30 0.38 3 520 6 1 4 1 7
4ENB_A 0.67 0.58 0.79 11 1261 3 1 2 0 8
4FNJ_A - 0.75 0.63 0.91 10 584 1 0 1 0 6
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 319 1 0 0 1 0

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.