CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ProbKnot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Alterna - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ProbKnot & Alterna [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ProbKnot Alterna
MCC 0.723 > 0.688
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.728 ± 0.090 > 0.704 ± 0.085
Sensitivity 0.671 > 0.630
Positive Predictive Value 0.785 > 0.760
Total TP 571 > 536
Total TN 63183 < 63205
Total FP 189 < 201
Total FP CONTRA 23 < 24
Total FP INCONS 133 < 145
Total FP COMP 33 > 32
Total FN 280 < 315
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ProbKnot and Alterna. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ProbKnot and Alterna).

  2. Comparison of performance of ProbKnot and Alterna. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ProbKnot and Alterna).

  3. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ProbKnot and Alterna).

  4. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ProbKnot and Alterna).

  5. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ProbKnot and Alterna. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ProbKnot and Alterna).

  6. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ProbKnot and Alterna. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ProbKnot and Alterna).

^top





Performance of ProbKnot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ProbKnot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 571
Total TN 63183
Total FP 189
Total FP CONTRA 23
Total FP INCONS 133
Total FP COMP 33
Total FN 280
Total Scores
MCC 0.723
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.728 ± 0.090
Sensitivity 0.671
Positive Predictive Value 0.785
Nr of predictions 48

^top



2. Individual counts for ProbKnot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KX8_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 845 0 0 0 0 2
2KXM_A - 0.78 0.70 0.88 7 343 1 0 1 0 3
2KZL_A - 0.83 0.74 0.93 14 1470 1 0 1 0 5
2L1F_A 0.98 0.96 1.00 23 2057 0 0 0 0 1
2L1F_B 0.98 0.96 1.00 24 2121 0 0 0 0 1
2L2K_A - 0.94 0.89 1.00 17 844 0 0 0 0 2
2L3C_B - 0.91 0.82 1.00 14 547 0 0 0 0 3
2L3E_A - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 583 1 0 0 1 1
2L3J_B 0.94 0.88 1.00 30 2455 0 0 0 0 4
2L5Z_A - 0.86 0.75 1.00 9 316 0 0 0 0 3
2L94_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 971 0 0 0 0 1
2LA5_A - 0.45 0.32 0.67 6 621 3 0 3 0 13
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
2LDL_A - 0.90 0.82 1.00 9 342 1 0 0 1 2
2LDT_A - 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 454 0 0 0 0 4
2LK3_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 267 0 0 0 0 1
2RRC_A - 0.70 0.50 1.00 5 226 0 0 0 0 5
2XKV_B 0.51 0.50 0.53 10 4541 24 0 9 15 10
2XQD_Y 0.90 0.81 1.00 22 2828 1 0 0 1 5
2Y8W_B - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 184 1 0 0 1 0
2Y9C_V - 0.65 0.63 0.68 15 2256 8 1 6 1 9
2YIE_X - 0.34 0.33 0.36 4 1367 7 2 5 0 8
2YIE_Z - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 3 12 0 12
3AKZ_H 0.73 0.75 0.72 21 2672 8 4 4 0 7
3AM1_B - 0.74 0.71 0.78 25 3208 7 1 6 0 10
3AMU_B 0.65 0.59 0.73 16 2981 8 0 6 2 11
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1212 13 0 13 0 17
3J0L_8 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 7 183 0 0 0 0 1
3J0L_a - 0.55 0.50 0.62 8 1115 5 2 3 0 8
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 458 7 2 5 0 4
3J0L_1 - 0.76 0.63 0.92 12 1212 3 0 1 2 7
3J16_L 0.35 0.33 0.38 10 2749 16 1 15 0 20
3NKB_B - 0.59 0.54 0.67 14 1995 7 0 7 0 12
3NMU_E - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 552 11 2 7 2 6
3OVB_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 584 2 0 0 2 0
3OVS_D - 0.92 0.92 0.92 12 548 1 0 1 0 1
3P22_G - 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 730 1 0 0 1 1
3R4F_A - 0.96 0.92 1.00 23 2122 0 0 0 0 2
3R9X_C - 0.84 0.80 0.89 8 586 2 0 1 1 2
3RKF_A 0.73 0.59 0.91 20 2189 2 1 1 0 14
3SD1_A 0.55 0.48 0.65 20 3885 11 2 9 0 22
3SIU_F - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 372 0 0 0 0 5
3SN2_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 394 0 0 0 0 0
3TRZ_Z - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 205 2 0 0 2 1
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 247 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 271 0 0 0 0 0
3UZL_B 0.73 0.62 0.85 23 3543 4 0 4 0 14

^top



Performance of Alterna - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Alterna

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 536
Total TN 63205
Total FP 201
Total FP CONTRA 24
Total FP INCONS 145
Total FP COMP 32
Total FN 315
Total Scores
MCC 0.688
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.704 ± 0.085
Sensitivity 0.630
Positive Predictive Value 0.760
Nr of predictions 48

^top



2. Individual counts for Alterna [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KX8_A 0.88 0.83 0.94 15 845 1 0 1 0 3
2KXM_A - 0.70 0.50 1.00 5 346 0 0 0 0 5
2KZL_A - 0.78 0.74 0.82 14 1468 3 1 2 0 5
2L1F_A 0.98 0.96 1.00 23 2057 0 0 0 0 1
2L1F_B 0.98 0.96 1.00 24 2121 0 0 0 0 1
2L2K_A - 0.94 0.89 1.00 17 844 0 0 0 0 2
2L3C_B - 0.91 0.82 1.00 14 547 0 0 0 0 3
2L3E_A - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 583 1 0 0 1 1
2L3J_B 0.94 0.88 1.00 30 2455 0 0 0 0 4
2L5Z_A - 0.86 0.75 1.00 9 316 0 0 0 0 3
2L94_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 971 0 0 0 0 1
2LA5_A - 0.46 0.26 0.83 5 624 1 0 1 0 14
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A 0.46 0.40 0.53 8 1525 7 0 7 0 12
2LDL_A - 0.90 0.82 1.00 9 342 1 0 0 1 2
2LDT_A - 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 454 0 0 0 0 4
2LK3_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 267 0 0 0 0 1
2RRC_A - 0.70 0.50 1.00 5 226 0 0 0 0 5
2XKV_B 0.45 0.45 0.45 9 4540 25 0 11 14 11
2XQD_Y 0.67 0.59 0.76 16 2829 5 0 5 0 11
2Y8W_B - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 184 1 0 0 1 0
2Y9C_V - 0.65 0.63 0.68 15 2256 8 1 6 1 9
2YIE_X - 0.36 0.33 0.40 4 1368 9 2 4 3 8
2YIE_Z - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 3 12 0 12
3AKZ_H 0.40 0.39 0.42 11 2675 15 4 11 0 17
3AM1_B - 0.61 0.57 0.67 20 3210 10 1 9 0 15
3AMU_B 0.64 0.59 0.70 16 2980 9 0 7 2 11
3J0L_7 - 0.26 0.24 0.31 4 1212 9 0 9 0 13
3J0L_8 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 7 183 0 0 0 0 1
3J0L_a - 0.23 0.19 0.30 3 1118 7 1 6 0 13
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 456 9 4 5 0 4
3J0L_1 - 0.61 0.53 0.71 10 1211 6 0 4 2 9
3J16_L 0.63 0.53 0.76 16 2754 5 1 4 0 14
3NKB_B - 0.35 0.31 0.42 8 1997 11 0 11 0 18
3NMU_E - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 553 10 2 6 2 6
3OVB_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 584 1 0 0 1 0
3OVS_D - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 549 0 0 0 0 1
3P22_G - 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 730 0 0 0 0 1
3R4F_A - 0.96 0.92 1.00 23 2122 0 0 0 0 2
3R9X_C - 0.84 0.80 0.89 8 586 2 0 1 1 2
3RKF_A 0.69 0.56 0.86 19 2189 3 1 2 0 15
3SD1_A 0.46 0.38 0.57 16 3888 12 1 11 0 26
3SIU_F - 0.59 0.55 0.67 6 369 3 0 3 0 5
3SN2_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 2
3TRZ_Z - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 205 2 0 0 2 1
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 247 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 271 0 0 0 0 0
3UZL_B 0.52 0.43 0.64 16 3545 9 2 7 0 21

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.