CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RDfolder - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Carnac(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RDfolder & Carnac(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RDfolder Carnac(seed)
MCC 0.569 > 0.338
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.588 ± 0.154 > 0.229 ± 0.159
Sensitivity 0.464 > 0.116
Positive Predictive Value 0.707 < 1.000
Total TP 261 > 65
Total TN 47701 < 48005
Total FP 112 > 0
Total FP CONTRA 12 > 0
Total FP INCONS 96 > 0
Total FP COMP 4 > 0
Total FN 301 < 497
P-value 5.19332990918e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RDfolder and Carnac(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RDfolder and Carnac(seed)).

  2. Comparison of performance of RDfolder and Carnac(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RDfolder and Carnac(seed)).

  3. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RDfolder and Carnac(seed)).

  4. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RDfolder and Carnac(seed)).

  5. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RDfolder and Carnac(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RDfolder and Carnac(seed)).

  6. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RDfolder and Carnac(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RDfolder and Carnac(seed)).

^top





Performance of RDfolder - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RDfolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 261
Total TN 47701
Total FP 112
Total FP CONTRA 12
Total FP INCONS 96
Total FP COMP 4
Total FN 301
Total Scores
MCC 0.569
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.588 ± 0.154
Sensitivity 0.464
Positive Predictive Value 0.707
Nr of predictions 21

^top



2. Individual counts for RDfolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2KE6_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 15 1113 1 0 0 1 4
2KUR_A 0.87 0.76 1.00 16 1112 0 0 0 0 5
2KUU_A 0.84 0.71 1.00 15 1113 1 0 0 1 6
2KUV_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 16 1112 0 0 0 0 6
2KUW_A 0.87 0.76 1.00 16 1112 0 0 0 0 5
2L1F_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2067 13 2 11 0 24
2L1F_B 0.98 0.96 1.00 24 2121 0 0 0 0 1
2L94_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 971 0 0 0 0 1
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1526 14 2 12 0 20
2XKV_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4538 22 5 17 0 20
3A3A_A 0.53 0.41 0.71 15 3634 6 0 6 0 22
3GX2_A 0.50 0.40 0.64 16 4346 10 1 8 1 24
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.30 0.17 0.54 7 3903 6 0 6 0 35
3W3S_B 0.27 0.23 0.33 9 4726 18 1 17 0 31
4AOB_A 0.35 0.26 0.48 11 4348 13 1 11 1 31
4ENB_A 0.43 0.32 0.60 6 1265 4 0 4 0 13
4ENC_A 0.43 0.32 0.60 6 1316 4 0 4 0 13

^top



Performance of Carnac(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Carnac(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 65
Total TN 48005
Total FP 0
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 0
Total FP COMP 0
Total FN 497
Total Scores
MCC 0.338
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.229 ± 0.159
Sensitivity 0.116
Positive Predictive Value 1.000
Nr of predictions 21

^top



2. Individual counts for Carnac(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2KE6_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1128 0 0 0 0 19
2KUR_A 0.57 0.33 1.00 7 1121 0 0 0 0 14
2KUU_A 0.57 0.33 1.00 7 1121 0 0 0 0 14
2KUV_A 0.64 0.41 1.00 9 1119 0 0 0 0 13
2KUW_A 0.65 0.43 1.00 9 1119 0 0 0 0 12
2L1F_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2080 0 0 0 0 24
2L1F_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2145 0 0 0 0 25
2L94_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 971 0 0 0 0 1
2LC8_A 0.44 0.20 1.00 4 1536 0 0 0 0 16
2XKV_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4560 0 0 0 0 20
3A3A_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3655 0 0 0 0 37
3GX2_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4371 0 0 0 0 40
3IVN_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2346 0 0 0 0 31
3LA5_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2485 0 0 0 0 34
3RKF_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2211 0 0 0 0 34
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3916 0 0 0 0 42
3W3S_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4753 0 0 0 0 40
4AOB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4371 0 0 0 0 42
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1275 0 0 0 0 19
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1326 0 0 0 0 19

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.