CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods

Laboratory of Structural Bioinformatics @ Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan

Home

Methods

Datasets

Rankings

RNA 2D Atlas

Help

FAQ

Contact us

RSS feeds

Twitter

Overview

Metric	RNASLOpt		Cylofold
MCC	0.539	>	0.522
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.601 ± 0.111	<	0.616 ± 0.096
Sensitivity	0.445	>	0.436
Positive Predictive Value	0.658	>	0.632
Total TP	403	>	395
Total TN	110997	>	110984
Total FP	224	<	243
Total FP CONTRA	17	=	17
Total FP INCONS	192	<	213
Total FP COMP	15	>	13
Total FN	502	<	510
P-value	3.56938820447e-08

^top

Performance plots

Comparison of performance of RNASLOpt and Cylofold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and Cylofold).
Comparison of performance of RNASLOpt and Cylofold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and Cylofold).
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and Cylofold).
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and Cylofold).
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASLOpt and Cylofold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and Cylofold).
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASLOpt and Cylofold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and Cylofold).

^top

Performance of RNASLOpt - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASLOpt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	403
Total TN	110997
Total FP	224
Total FP CONTRA	17
Total FP INCONS	192
Total FP COMP	15
Total FN	502

Total Scores
MCC	0.539
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.601 ± 0.111
Sensitivity	0.445
Positive Predictive Value	0.658
Nr of predictions	35

^top

2. Individual counts for RNASLOpt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2LC8_A	GP_knot1 links to Rfam database...	0.47	0.35	0.64	7	1529	4	0	4	0	13
2LDL_A	-	0.90	0.82	1.00	9	342	1	0	0	1	2
2LI4_A	-	0.93	0.88	1.00	14	482	0	0	0	0	2
2LK3_A	-	0.95	0.90	1.00	9	267	0	0	0	0	1
2LKR_A	-	0.68	0.62	0.75	24	6073	9	0	8	1	15
2LWK_A	-	0.83	0.77	0.91	10	485	1	0	1	0	3
3J0L_h	-	0.70	0.49	1.00	21	6084	0	0	0	0	22
3J0L_2	-	0.39	0.36	0.43	12	6188	18	2	14	2	21
3J0L_7	-	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	1212	13	0	13	0	17
3J0L_a	-	0.26	0.19	0.38	3	1120	5	1	4	0	13
3J0L_1	-	0.65	0.47	0.90	9	1215	3	0	1	2	10
3J0L_g	-	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	461	4	1	3	0	4
3J16_L	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.53	0.40	0.71	12	2758	5	0	5	0	18
3J20_0	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.66	0.57	0.77	17	2828	6	1	4	1	13
3J20_1	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.96	0.91	1.00	21	2905	0	0	0	0	2
3J2C_O	-	0.62	0.49	0.78	31	10256	10	0	9	1	32
3J2L_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.56	0.43	0.72	23	7843	11	0	9	2	30
3SN2_B	IRE_II links to Rfam database...	0.96	0.92	1.00	11	395	0	0	0	0	1
3TRZ_Z	-	0.91	0.83	1.00	5	205	2	0	0	2	1
3TS2_V	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	5	271	0	0	0	0	0
3U4M_B	-	0.38	0.32	0.46	12	3134	14	0	14	0	25
3UZL_B	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.48	0.32	0.71	12	3553	5	0	5	0	25
3VJR_D	-	0.96	0.92	1.00	12	618	0	0	0	0	1
3W3S_B	tRNA-Sec links to Rfam database...	0.82	0.70	0.97	28	4724	2	0	1	1	12
3ZEX_D	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.76	0.59	0.97	29	6991	1	0	1	0	20
3ZEX_E	-	0.00	0.00	0.00	0	21892	55	4	49	2	77
4A4U_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	222	0	0	0	0	0
4AOB_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.26	0.19	0.38	8	4350	13	2	11	0	34
4ATO_G	-	0.30	0.30	0.33	3	519	6	2	4	0	7
4ENB_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.76	0.58	1.00	11	1264	0	0	0	0	8
4ENC_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.65	0.47	0.90	9	1316	1	1	0	0	10
4FNJ_A	-	-0.02	0.00	0.00	0	584	11	0	11	0	16
4FRG_B	AdoCbl-variant links to Rfam database...	0.56	0.47	0.68	15	3464	7	1	6	0	17
4FRN_A	AdoCbl-variant links to Rfam database...	0.20	0.17	0.26	6	5128	17	2	15	0	30
4HXH_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	6	319	0	0	0	0	0

^top

Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	395
Total TN	110984
Total FP	243
Total FP CONTRA	17
Total FP INCONS	213
Total FP COMP	13
Total FN	510

Total Scores
MCC	0.522
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.616 ± 0.096
Sensitivity	0.436
Positive Predictive Value	0.632
Nr of predictions	35

^top

2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2LC8_A	GP_knot1 links to Rfam database...	0.61	0.55	0.69	11	1524	5	0	5	0	9
2LDL_A	-	0.73	0.55	1.00	6	345	0	0	0	0	5
2LI4_A	-	0.93	0.88	1.00	14	482	0	0	0	0	2
2LK3_A	-	0.95	0.90	1.00	9	267	0	0	0	0	1
2LKR_A	-	0.50	0.44	0.59	17	6076	12	2	10	0	22
2LWK_A	-	0.83	0.77	0.91	10	485	1	0	1	0	3
3J0L_h	-	0.48	0.37	0.62	16	6079	10	0	10	0	27
3J0L_2	-	0.39	0.36	0.43	12	6188	18	2	14	2	21
3J0L_7	-	0.30	0.29	0.33	5	1210	10	0	10	0	12
3J0L_a	-	0.22	0.19	0.27	3	1117	8	1	7	0	13
3J0L_1	-	0.65	0.47	0.90	9	1215	2	0	1	1	10
3J0L_g	-	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	461	4	1	3	0	4
3J16_L	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.75	0.57	1.00	17	2758	0	0	0	0	13
3J20_0	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.66	0.57	0.77	17	2828	6	1	4	1	13
3J20_1	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.69	0.70	0.70	16	2903	7	2	5	0	7
3J2C_O	-	0.43	0.33	0.55	21	10258	18	0	17	1	42
3J2L_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.56	0.43	0.72	23	7843	11	0	9	2	30
3SN2_B	IRE_II links to Rfam database...	0.64	0.42	1.00	5	401	0	0	0	0	7
3TRZ_Z	-	0.91	0.83	1.00	5	205	1	0	0	1	1
3TS2_V	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	5	271	0	0	0	0	0
3U4M_B	-	0.38	0.32	0.46	12	3134	14	0	14	0	25
3UZL_B	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.45	0.38	0.54	14	3544	12	1	11	0	23
3VJR_D	-	0.96	0.92	1.00	12	618	0	0	0	0	1
3W3S_B	tRNA-Sec links to Rfam database...	0.44	0.38	0.52	15	4724	15	0	14	1	25
3ZEX_D	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.58	0.49	0.69	24	6986	11	0	11	0	25
3ZEX_E	-	0.00	0.00	0.00	0	21897	51	2	46	3	77
4A4U_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	222	0	0	0	0	0
4AOB_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.35	0.26	0.48	11	4348	13	1	11	1	31
4ATO_G	-	0.73	0.70	0.78	7	519	2	1	1	0	3
4ENB_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.89	0.79	1.00	15	1260	0	0	0	0	4
4ENC_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.86	0.79	0.94	15	1310	1	1	0	0	4
4FNJ_A	-	0.70	0.50	1.00	8	587	0	0	0	0	8
4FRG_B	AdoCbl-variant links to Rfam database...	0.81	0.66	1.00	21	3465	0	0	0	0	11
4FRN_A	AdoCbl-variant links to Rfam database...	0.20	0.14	0.31	5	5135	11	2	9	0	31
4HXH_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	6	319	0	0	0	0	0

^top

Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.

Table of contents:

Overview

Performance plots

Performance of RNASLOpt - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASLOpt

2. Individual counts for RNASLOpt [ download as .csv ]

Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]