CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASLOpt - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Mastr(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASLOpt & Mastr(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASLOpt Mastr(20)
MCC 0.540 > 0.475
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.575 ± 0.157 > 0.384 ± 0.208
Sensitivity 0.443 > 0.308
Positive Predictive Value 0.664 < 0.740
Total TP 180 > 125
Total TN 63976 < 64078
Total FP 113 > 49
Total FP CONTRA 15 > 1
Total FP INCONS 76 > 43
Total FP COMP 22 > 5
Total FN 226 < 281
P-value 8.5281770229e-09

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASLOpt and Mastr(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and Mastr(20)).

  2. Comparison of performance of RNASLOpt and Mastr(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and Mastr(20)).

  3. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and Mastr(20)).

  4. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and Mastr(20)).

  5. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASLOpt and Mastr(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and Mastr(20)).

  6. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASLOpt and Mastr(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and Mastr(20)).

^top





Performance of RNASLOpt - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASLOpt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 180
Total TN 63976
Total FP 113
Total FP CONTRA 15
Total FP INCONS 76
Total FP COMP 22
Total FN 226
Total Scores
MCC 0.540
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.575 ± 0.157
Sensitivity 0.443
Positive Predictive Value 0.664
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASLOpt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.66 0.57 0.77 17 2828 6 1 4 1 13
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J2L_3 0.56 0.43 0.72 23 7843 11 0 9 2 30
3ZEX_C 0.26 0.21 0.33 11 14163 35 2 20 13 41
3ZEX_D 0.76 0.59 0.97 29 6991 1 0 1 0 20
4A1C_2 0.23 0.24 0.22 8 11744 35 8 21 6 25
4A1C_3 0.67 0.52 0.88 28 7108 4 0 4 0 26
4AOB_A 0.26 0.19 0.38 8 4350 13 2 11 0 34
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10
4FRG_B 0.56 0.47 0.68 15 3464 7 1 6 0 17

^top



Performance of Mastr(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Mastr(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 125
Total TN 64078
Total FP 49
Total FP CONTRA 1
Total FP INCONS 43
Total FP COMP 5
Total FN 281
Total Scores
MCC 0.475
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.384 ± 0.208
Sensitivity 0.308
Positive Predictive Value 0.740
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for Mastr(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.84 0.70 1.00 21 2829 1 0 0 1 9
3J20_1 0.25 0.22 0.29 5 2909 12 0 12 0 18
3J2L_3 0.34 0.25 0.48 13 7848 16 1 13 2 40
3ZEX_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 14196 0 0 0 0 52
3ZEX_D 0.80 0.71 0.90 35 6982 4 0 4 0 14
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 11781 0 0 0 0 33
4A1C_3 0.70 0.59 0.84 32 7102 7 0 6 1 22
4AOB_A 0.39 0.26 0.58 11 4352 9 0 8 1 31
4ENB_A 0.39 0.16 1.00 3 1272 0 0 0 0 16
4ENC_A 0.51 0.26 1.00 5 1321 0 0 0 0 14
4FRG_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3486 0 0 0 0 32

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.