CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASLOpt - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Pknots - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASLOpt & Pknots [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASLOpt Pknots
MCC 0.537 > 0.491
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.597 ± 0.102 > 0.594 ± 0.103
Sensitivity 0.435 < 0.445
Positive Predictive Value 0.671 > 0.549
Total TP 468 < 479
Total TN 141743 > 141568
Total FP 263 < 431
Total FP CONTRA 28 < 36
Total FP INCONS 201 < 357
Total FP COMP 34 < 38
Total FN 609 > 598
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASLOpt and Pknots. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and Pknots).

  2. Comparison of performance of RNASLOpt and Pknots. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and Pknots).

  3. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and Pknots).

  4. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and Pknots).

  5. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASLOpt and Pknots. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and Pknots).

  6. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASLOpt and Pknots. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and Pknots).

^top





Performance of RNASLOpt - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASLOpt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 468
Total TN 141743
Total FP 263
Total FP CONTRA 28
Total FP INCONS 201
Total FP COMP 34
Total FN 609
Total Scores
MCC 0.537
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.597 ± 0.102
Sensitivity 0.435
Positive Predictive Value 0.671
Nr of predictions 44

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASLOpt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.47 0.35 0.64 7 1529 4 0 4 0 13
2LDL_A - 0.90 0.82 1.00 9 342 1 0 0 1 2
2LHP_A - 0.97 0.94 1.00 15 651 0 0 0 0 1
2LI4_A - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 2
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 343 2 0 0 2 0
2LK3_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 267 0 0 0 0 1
2LKR_A - 0.68 0.62 0.75 24 6073 9 0 8 1 15
2LQZ_A - 0.85 0.82 0.90 9 341 1 1 0 0 2
2LWK_A - 0.83 0.77 0.91 10 485 1 0 1 0 3
3J0L_h - 0.70 0.49 1.00 21 6084 0 0 0 0 22
3J0L_a - 0.26 0.19 0.38 3 1120 5 1 4 0 13
3J0L_1 - 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1215 3 0 1 2 10
3J0L_8 - 0.70 0.50 1.00 4 186 0 0 0 0 4
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1212 13 0 13 0 17
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 461 4 1 3 0 4
3J0L_2 - 0.39 0.36 0.43 12 6188 18 2 14 2 21
3J16_L 0.53 0.40 0.71 12 2758 5 0 5 0 18
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J20_0 0.66 0.57 0.77 17 2828 6 1 4 1 13
3J2L_3 0.56 0.43 0.72 23 7843 11 0 9 2 30
3SN2_B 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 395 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 205 2 0 0 2 1
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 247 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 271 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.38 0.32 0.46 12 3134 14 0 14 0 25
3UZL_B 0.48 0.32 0.71 12 3553 5 0 5 0 25
3VJR_D - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 618 0 0 0 0 1
3W3S_B 0.82 0.70 0.97 28 4724 2 0 1 1 12
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2628 0 0 0 0 12
3ZEX_G - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 16471 0 0 0 0 74
3ZEX_D 0.76 0.59 0.97 29 6991 1 0 1 0 20
3ZEX_H - 0.19 0.18 0.21 7 9012 26 4 22 0 31
3ZEX_C 0.26 0.21 0.33 11 14163 35 2 20 13 41
4A1C_3 0.67 0.52 0.88 28 7108 4 0 4 0 26
4A1C_2 0.23 0.24 0.22 8 11744 35 8 21 6 25
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.26 0.19 0.38 8 4350 13 2 11 0 34
4ATO_G - 0.30 0.30 0.33 3 519 6 2 4 0 7
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10
4FNJ_A - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 584 11 0 11 0 16
4FRG_B 0.56 0.47 0.68 15 3464 7 1 6 0 17
4FRN_A 0.20 0.17 0.26 6 5128 17 2 15 0 30
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 319 0 0 0 0 0

^top



Performance of Pknots - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Pknots

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 479
Total TN 141568
Total FP 431
Total FP CONTRA 36
Total FP INCONS 357
Total FP COMP 38
Total FN 598
Total Scores
MCC 0.491
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.594 ± 0.103
Sensitivity 0.445
Positive Predictive Value 0.549
Nr of predictions 44

^top



2. Individual counts for Pknots [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.79 0.75 0.83 15 1522 3 1 2 0 5
2LDL_A - 0.90 0.82 1.00 9 342 1 0 0 1 2
2LHP_A - 0.97 0.94 1.00 15 651 0 0 0 0 1
2LI4_A - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 2
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 343 2 0 0 2 0
2LK3_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 267 0 0 0 0 1
2LKR_A - 0.44 0.44 0.45 17 6067 22 4 17 1 22
2LQZ_A - 0.85 0.82 0.90 9 341 1 1 0 0 2
2LWK_A - 0.33 0.23 0.50 3 490 3 0 3 0 10
3J0L_h - 0.58 0.49 0.70 21 6075 11 0 9 2 22
3J0L_a - 0.35 0.31 0.42 5 1116 7 1 6 0 11
3J0L_1 - 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1215 2 0 1 1 10
3J0L_8 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 7 183 0 0 0 0 1
3J0L_7 - 0.28 0.29 0.29 5 1208 12 0 12 0 12
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 460 5 2 3 0 4
3J0L_2 - 0.36 0.36 0.36 12 6183 23 3 18 2 21
3J16_L 0.34 0.30 0.41 9 2753 13 0 13 0 21
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J20_0 0.84 0.70 1.00 21 2829 1 0 0 1 9
3J2L_3 0.62 0.51 0.75 27 7839 12 0 9 3 26
3SN2_B 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 395 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 205 1 0 0 1 1
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 247 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 271 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.26 0.22 0.32 8 3135 17 0 17 0 29
3UZL_B 0.75 0.59 0.96 22 3547 1 0 1 0 15
3VJR_D - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 618 0 0 0 0 1
3W3S_B 0.71 0.63 0.81 25 4722 7 0 6 1 15
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2619 12 2 7 3 12
3ZEX_G - 0.36 0.32 0.41 24 16413 37 3 31 3 50
3ZEX_D 0.27 0.24 0.30 12 6981 28 0 28 0 37
3ZEX_H - 0.20 0.21 0.20 8 9005 32 5 27 0 30
3ZEX_C 0.07 0.08 0.07 4 14141 54 4 47 3 48
4A1C_3 0.25 0.22 0.29 12 7099 29 1 28 0 42
4A1C_2 0.24 0.24 0.25 8 11749 36 3 21 12 25
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.17 0.14 0.21 6 4343 23 1 21 1 36
4ATO_G - 0.30 0.30 0.33 3 519 6 2 4 0 7
4ENB_A 0.83 0.79 0.88 15 1258 2 1 1 0 4
4ENC_A 0.86 0.79 0.94 15 1310 1 1 0 0 4
4FNJ_A - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 585 10 0 10 0 16
4FRG_B 0.48 0.38 0.63 12 3467 7 0 7 0 20
4FRN_A 0.51 0.42 0.63 15 5127 9 1 8 0 21
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 319 0 0 0 0 0

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.