CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASLOpt - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Vsfold5 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASLOpt & Vsfold5 [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASLOpt Vsfold5
MCC 0.553 > 0.433
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.631 ± 0.100 > 0.554 ± 0.115
Sensitivity 0.462 > 0.373
Positive Predictive Value 0.669 > 0.510
Total TP 466 > 376
Total TN 130373 > 130333
Total FP 255 < 387
Total FP CONTRA 25 < 30
Total FP INCONS 206 < 331
Total FP COMP 24 < 26
Total FN 542 < 632
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASLOpt and Vsfold5. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and Vsfold5).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and Vsfold5).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASLOpt and Vsfold5. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and Vsfold5).

^top





Performance of RNASLOpt - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASLOpt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 466
Total TN 130373
Total FP 255
Total FP CONTRA 25
Total FP INCONS 206
Total FP COMP 24
Total FN 542
Total Scores
MCC 0.553
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.631 ± 0.100
Sensitivity 0.462
Positive Predictive Value 0.669
Nr of predictions 39

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASLOpt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.47 0.35 0.64 7 1529 4 0 4 0 13
2LDL_A - 0.90 0.82 1.00 9 342 1 0 0 1 2
2LHP_A - 0.97 0.94 1.00 15 651 0 0 0 0 1
2LI4_A - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 2
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 343 2 0 0 2 0
2LK3_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 267 0 0 0 0 1
2LKR_A - 0.68 0.62 0.75 24 6073 9 0 8 1 15
2LWK_A - 0.83 0.77 0.91 10 485 1 0 1 0 3
3J0L_2 - 0.39 0.36 0.43 12 6188 18 2 14 2 21
3J0L_1 - 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1215 3 0 1 2 10
3J0L_8 - 0.70 0.50 1.00 4 186 0 0 0 0 4
3J0L_h - 0.70 0.49 1.00 21 6084 0 0 0 0 22
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1212 13 0 13 0 17
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 461 4 1 3 0 4
3J0L_a - 0.26 0.19 0.38 3 1120 5 1 4 0 13
3J16_L 0.53 0.40 0.71 12 2758 5 0 5 0 18
3J20_0 0.66 0.57 0.77 17 2828 6 1 4 1 13
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J2C_O - 0.62 0.49 0.78 31 10256 10 0 9 1 32
3J2L_3 0.56 0.43 0.72 23 7843 11 0 9 2 30
3SN2_B 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 395 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 205 2 0 0 2 1
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 247 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 271 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.38 0.32 0.46 12 3134 14 0 14 0 25
3UZL_B 0.48 0.32 0.71 12 3553 5 0 5 0 25
3VJR_D - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 618 0 0 0 0 1
3W3S_B 0.82 0.70 0.97 28 4724 2 0 1 1 12
3ZEX_D 0.76 0.59 0.97 29 6991 1 0 1 0 20
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21892 55 4 49 2 77
4A1C_3 0.67 0.52 0.88 28 7108 4 0 4 0 26
4A1C_2 0.23 0.24 0.22 8 11744 35 8 21 6 25
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.26 0.19 0.38 8 4350 13 2 11 0 34
4ATO_G - 0.30 0.30 0.33 3 519 6 2 4 0 7
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10
4FRG_B 0.56 0.47 0.68 15 3464 7 1 6 0 17
4FRN_A 0.20 0.17 0.26 6 5128 17 2 15 0 30

^top



Performance of Vsfold5 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Vsfold5

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 376
Total TN 130333
Total FP 387
Total FP CONTRA 30
Total FP INCONS 331
Total FP COMP 26
Total FN 632
Total Scores
MCC 0.433
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.554 ± 0.115
Sensitivity 0.373
Positive Predictive Value 0.510
Nr of predictions 39

^top



2. Individual counts for Vsfold5 [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1527 13 0 13 0 20
2LDL_A - 0.85 0.73 1.00 8 343 1 0 0 1 3
2LHP_A - 0.97 0.94 1.00 15 651 0 0 0 0 1
2LI4_A - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 2
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 343 2 0 0 2 0
2LK3_A - 0.89 0.80 1.00 8 268 0 0 0 0 2
2LKR_A - 0.27 0.23 0.32 9 6077 19 2 17 0 30
2LWK_A - 0.83 0.77 0.91 10 485 1 0 1 0 3
3J0L_2 - 0.35 0.33 0.37 11 6186 21 3 16 2 22
3J0L_1 - 0.27 0.21 0.36 4 1214 7 1 6 0 15
3J0L_8 - 0.70 0.50 1.00 4 186 0 0 0 0 4
3J0L_h - 0.18 0.14 0.24 6 6080 19 1 18 0 37
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1212 13 0 13 0 17
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 461 4 1 3 0 4
3J0L_a - 0.39 0.31 0.50 5 1118 5 2 3 0 11
3J16_L 0.82 0.67 1.00 20 2755 0 0 0 0 10
3J20_0 0.67 0.57 0.81 17 2829 5 1 3 1 13
3J20_1 0.71 0.70 0.73 16 2904 6 0 6 0 7
3J2C_O - 0.30 0.24 0.39 15 10258 24 0 23 1 48
3J2L_3 0.56 0.45 0.71 24 7841 13 1 9 3 29
3SN2_B 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 395 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 205 1 0 0 1 1
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 247 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 271 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.38 0.32 0.46 12 3134 14 0 14 0 25
3UZL_B 0.16 0.14 0.20 5 3545 20 1 19 0 32
3VJR_D - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 618 0 0 0 0 1
3W3S_B 0.76 0.70 0.82 28 4719 7 1 5 1 12
3ZEX_D 0.08 0.06 0.11 3 6994 24 0 24 0 46
3ZEX_E - 0.07 0.06 0.08 5 21886 54 5 49 0 72
4A1C_3 0.26 0.22 0.32 12 7103 25 2 23 0 42
4A1C_2 0.24 0.24 0.24 8 11748 37 3 22 12 25
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.18 0.14 0.25 6 4347 19 1 17 1 36
4ATO_G - 0.56 0.60 0.55 6 517 5 1 4 0 4
4ENB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 15 1260 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.86 0.79 0.94 15 1310 1 1 0 0 4
4FRG_B 0.56 0.47 0.68 15 3464 7 1 6 0 17
4FRN_A 0.13 0.11 0.17 4 5128 19 2 17 0 32

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.