CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(seed) & RNASampler(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASampler(seed) RNASampler(20)
MCC 0.541 > 0.528
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.585 ± 0.177 < 0.589 ± 0.224
Sensitivity 0.399 < 0.426
Positive Predictive Value 0.739 > 0.660
Total TP 116 < 124
Total TN 60338 > 60307
Total FP 60 < 96
Total FP CONTRA 5 < 7
Total FP INCONS 36 < 57
Total FP COMP 19 < 32
Total FN 175 > 167
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASampler(seed) and RNASampler(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and RNASampler(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and RNASampler(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(seed) and RNASampler(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and RNASampler(20)).

^top





Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 116
Total TN 60338
Total FP 60
Total FP CONTRA 5
Total FP INCONS 36
Total FP COMP 19
Total FN 175
Total Scores
MCC 0.541
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.585 ± 0.177
Sensitivity 0.399
Positive Predictive Value 0.739
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2L94_A 0.71 0.55 0.92 11 978 1 0 1 0 9
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3JYX_4 0.39 0.30 0.50 10 12226 13 2 8 3 23
3O58_3 0.45 0.34 0.60 12 12383 12 2 6 4 23
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.60 0.38 0.94 16 3899 1 0 1 0 26
3ZEX_C 0.32 0.19 0.53 10 14177 13 1 8 4 42
4A1C_2 0.31 0.24 0.40 8 11761 20 0 12 8 25

^top



Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 124
Total TN 60307
Total FP 96
Total FP CONTRA 7
Total FP INCONS 57
Total FP COMP 32
Total FN 167
Total Scores
MCC 0.528
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.589 ± 0.224
Sensitivity 0.426
Positive Predictive Value 0.660
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2L94_A 0.92 0.90 0.95 18 971 1 0 1 0 2
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3JYX_4 0.32 0.30 0.34 10 12217 26 4 15 7 23
3O58_3 0.43 0.34 0.55 12 12381 18 2 8 8 23
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.67 0.48 0.95 20 3895 1 0 1 0 22
3ZEX_C 0.27 0.19 0.38 10 14170 20 1 15 4 42
4A1C_2 0.18 0.15 0.23 5 11759 30 0 17 13 28

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.