CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNAalifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNAalifold(20) & RNAwolf [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNAalifold(20) RNAwolf
MCC 0.644 > 0.348
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.635 ± 0.093 > 0.375 ± 0.099
Sensitivity 0.503 > 0.328
Positive Predictive Value 0.829 > 0.379
Total TP 397 > 259
Total TN 119846 > 119641
Total FP 100 < 467
Total FP CONTRA 7 < 53
Total FP INCONS 75 < 372
Total FP COMP 18 < 42
Total FN 393 < 531
P-value 5.1503931209e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNAalifold(20) and RNAwolf. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(20) and RNAwolf).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(20) and RNAwolf).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAalifold(20) and RNAwolf. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(20) and RNAwolf).

^top





Performance of RNAalifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAalifold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 397
Total TN 119846
Total FP 100
Total FP CONTRA 7
Total FP INCONS 75
Total FP COMP 18
Total FN 393
Total Scores
MCC 0.644
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.635 ± 0.093
Sensitivity 0.503
Positive Predictive Value 0.829
Nr of predictions 21

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAalifold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.86 0.74 1.00 20 2983 1 0 0 1 7
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J20_0 0.84 0.70 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 9
3J2L_3 0.69 0.47 1.00 25 7850 2 0 0 2 28
3J3D_C 0.80 0.68 0.95 19 2755 1 0 1 0 9
3J3E_8 0.23 0.15 0.36 5 7489 9 1 8 0 28
3J3E_7 0.69 0.56 0.86 30 7105 5 1 4 0 24
3J3F_8 0.48 0.39 0.58 14 12222 17 1 9 7 22
3J3F_7 0.74 0.58 0.94 29 7229 2 0 2 0 21
3J3V_B 0.65 0.49 0.88 28 6989 4 0 4 0 29
3RKF_A 0.68 0.50 0.94 17 2193 1 0 1 0 17
3SD1_A 0.70 0.60 0.83 25 3886 5 1 4 0 17
3ZEX_D 0.80 0.69 0.92 34 6984 3 0 3 0 15
3ZEX_C 0.39 0.27 0.56 14 14171 14 1 10 3 38
3ZND_W 0.47 0.43 0.53 10 2984 11 0 9 2 13
4A1C_3 0.74 0.57 0.97 31 7108 1 0 1 0 23
4A1C_2 0.17 0.15 0.19 5 11755 23 2 19 2 28
4AOB_A 0.72 0.52 1.00 22 4349 1 0 0 1 20
4ENB_A 0.46 0.21 1.00 4 1271 0 0 0 0 15
4ENC_A 0.56 0.32 1.00 6 1320 0 0 0 0 13
4FRG_B 0.73 0.53 1.00 17 3469 0 0 0 0 15

^top



Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAwolf

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 259
Total TN 119641
Total FP 467
Total FP CONTRA 53
Total FP INCONS 372
Total FP COMP 42
Total FN 531
Total Scores
MCC 0.348
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.375 ± 0.099
Sensitivity 0.328
Positive Predictive Value 0.379
Nr of predictions 21

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAwolf [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.68 0.63 0.74 17 2980 9 0 6 3 10
3J20_1 0.46 0.52 0.41 12 2897 17 6 11 0 11
3J20_0 0.40 0.40 0.41 12 2821 18 0 17 1 18
3J2L_3 0.55 0.49 0.62 26 7833 18 0 16 2 27
3J3D_C 0.79 0.75 0.84 21 2750 5 2 2 1 7
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7470 42 4 29 9 33
3J3E_7 0.41 0.35 0.49 19 7101 20 1 19 0 35
3J3F_8 0.23 0.25 0.21 9 12204 45 5 28 12 27
3J3F_7 0.21 0.20 0.23 10 7216 34 2 32 0 40
3J3V_B 0.43 0.37 0.51 21 6980 20 2 18 0 36
3RKF_A 0.72 0.62 0.84 21 2186 4 0 4 0 13
3SD1_A 0.46 0.43 0.50 18 3880 18 0 18 0 24
3ZEX_D 0.20 0.18 0.22 9 6980 32 3 29 0 40
3ZEX_C 0.05 0.06 0.06 3 14144 49 12 37 0 49
3ZND_W 0.50 0.48 0.52 11 2982 13 0 10 3 12
4A1C_3 0.23 0.20 0.28 11 7101 28 2 26 0 43
4A1C_2 0.08 0.09 0.08 3 11741 46 10 27 9 30
4AOB_A 0.23 0.19 0.30 8 4344 20 1 18 1 34
4ENB_A 0.35 0.32 0.40 6 1260 9 1 8 0 13
4ENC_A 0.34 0.32 0.38 6 1310 10 1 9 0 13
4FRG_B 0.56 0.50 0.64 16 3461 10 1 8 1 16

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.