CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNAalifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNAalifold(seed) & CentroidHomfold‑LAST [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNAalifold(seed) CentroidHomfold‑LAST
MCC 0.584 > 0.556
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.555 ± 0.141 < 0.571 ± 0.201
Sensitivity 0.398 < 0.472
Positive Predictive Value 0.865 > 0.663
Total TP 134 < 159
Total TN 40645 > 40560
Total FP 25 < 89
Total FP CONTRA 3 < 11
Total FP INCONS 18 < 70
Total FP COMP 4 < 8
Total FN 203 > 178
P-value 1.68555027914e-06

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNAalifold(seed) and CentroidHomfold-LAST. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

  2. Comparison of performance of RNAalifold(seed) and CentroidHomfold-LAST. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAalifold(seed) and CentroidHomfold-LAST. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

  4. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAalifold(seed) and CentroidHomfold-LAST. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

^top





Performance of RNAalifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAalifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 134
Total TN 40645
Total FP 25
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 18
Total FP COMP 4
Total FN 203
Total Scores
MCC 0.584
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.555 ± 0.141
Sensitivity 0.398
Positive Predictive Value 0.865
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.59 0.40 0.89 8 981 1 0 1 0 12
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1528 12 0 12 0 20
3RKF_A 0.63 0.47 0.84 16 2192 3 1 2 0 18
3SD1_A 0.58 0.40 0.85 17 3896 3 1 2 0 25
3W3S_B 0.67 0.45 1.00 18 4735 1 0 0 1 22
4A1C_2 0.39 0.15 1.00 5 11776 2 0 0 2 28
4AOB_A 0.72 0.52 1.00 22 4349 1 0 0 1 20
4ENB_A 0.56 0.32 1.00 6 1269 0 0 0 0 13
4ENC_A 0.56 0.32 1.00 6 1320 0 0 0 0 13
4FRG_B 0.73 0.53 1.00 17 3469 0 0 0 0 15
4FRN_A 0.69 0.53 0.90 19 5130 2 1 1 0 17

^top



Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 159
Total TN 40560
Total FP 89
Total FP CONTRA 11
Total FP INCONS 70
Total FP COMP 8
Total FN 178
Total Scores
MCC 0.556
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.571 ± 0.201
Sensitivity 0.472
Positive Predictive Value 0.663
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.92 0.90 0.95 18 971 1 0 1 0 2
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1529 11 0 11 0 20
3RKF_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 18 2193 0 0 0 0 16
3SD1_A 0.64 0.45 0.90 19 3895 2 0 2 0 23
3W3S_B 0.85 0.73 1.00 29 4724 1 0 0 1 11
4A1C_2 0.16 0.15 0.18 5 11753 29 5 18 6 28
4AOB_A 0.71 0.50 1.00 21 4350 1 0 0 1 21
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1315 0 0 0 0 8
4FRG_B 0.41 0.41 0.43 13 3456 17 3 14 0 19
4FRN_A 0.36 0.39 0.34 14 5110 27 3 24 0 22

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.