CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNAalifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Contrafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNAalifold(seed) & Contrafold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNAalifold(seed) Contrafold
MCC 0.631 > 0.598
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.603 ± 0.076 < 0.677 ± 0.092
Sensitivity 0.460 < 0.532
Positive Predictive Value 0.866 > 0.673
Total TP 838 < 969
Total TN 1380645 > 1380174
Total FP 151 < 528
Total FP CONTRA 18 < 64
Total FP INCONS 112 < 406
Total FP COMP 21 < 58
Total FN 982 > 851
P-value 7.5939721025e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNAalifold(seed) and Contrafold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and Contrafold).

  2. Comparison of performance of RNAalifold(seed) and Contrafold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and Contrafold).

  3. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and Contrafold).

  4. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and Contrafold).

  5. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAalifold(seed) and Contrafold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and Contrafold).

  6. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAalifold(seed) and Contrafold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and Contrafold).

^top





Performance of RNAalifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAalifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 838
Total TN 1380645
Total FP 151
Total FP CONTRA 18
Total FP INCONS 112
Total FP COMP 21
Total FN 982
Total Scores
MCC 0.631
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.603 ± 0.076
Sensitivity 0.460
Positive Predictive Value 0.866
Nr of predictions 34

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.52 0.27 1.00 3 403 0 0 0 0 8
2KE6_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 18 1110 1 0 0 1 1
2KUR_A 0.95 0.90 1.00 19 1109 0 0 0 0 2
2KUU_A 0.92 0.86 1.00 18 1110 1 0 0 1 3
2KUV_A 0.93 0.86 1.00 19 1109 0 0 0 0 3
2KUW_A 0.84 0.76 0.94 16 1111 1 0 1 0 5
2KX8_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 861 0 0 0 0 18
2L1F_A 0.67 0.58 0.78 14 2062 4 0 4 0 10
2L1F_B 0.64 0.56 0.74 14 2126 5 0 5 0 11
2L94_A 0.59 0.40 0.89 8 981 1 0 1 0 12
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1528 12 0 12 0 20
2XKV_B 0.59 0.35 1.00 7 4553 2 0 0 2 13
2XXA_G 0.46 0.21 1.00 9 5142 0 0 0 0 33
3A3A_A 0.71 0.51 1.00 19 3636 0 0 0 0 18
3GX2_A 0.74 0.55 1.00 22 4349 1 0 0 1 18
3IVN_B 0.61 0.48 0.79 15 2327 4 2 2 0 16
3IYQ_A 0.38 0.21 0.69 20 60697 13 5 4 4 74
3IZ4_A 0.42 0.21 0.85 28 70843 5 1 4 0 104
3J20_2 0.69 0.58 0.83 367 1116322 80 5 71 4 266
3JYX_4 0.46 0.21 1.00 7 12239 2 0 0 2 26
3LA5_A 0.63 0.47 0.84 16 2466 3 1 2 0 18
3NPB_A 0.66 0.48 0.92 22 6997 3 1 1 1 24
3O58_3 0.51 0.26 1.00 9 12394 0 0 0 0 26
3PDR_A 0.68 0.46 1.00 33 12847 1 0 0 1 39
3RKF_A 0.63 0.47 0.84 16 2192 3 1 2 0 18
3SD1_A 0.58 0.40 0.85 17 3896 3 1 2 0 25
3W3S_B 0.67 0.45 1.00 18 4735 1 0 0 1 22
3ZEX_C 0.42 0.17 1.00 9 14187 0 0 0 0 43
4A1C_2 0.39 0.15 1.00 5 11776 2 0 0 2 28
4AOB_A 0.72 0.52 1.00 22 4349 1 0 0 1 20
4ENB_A 0.56 0.32 1.00 6 1269 0 0 0 0 13
4ENC_A 0.56 0.32 1.00 6 1320 0 0 0 0 13
4FRG_B 0.73 0.53 1.00 17 3469 0 0 0 0 15
4FRN_A 0.69 0.53 0.90 19 5130 2 1 1 0 17

^top



Performance of Contrafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Contrafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 969
Total TN 1380174
Total FP 528
Total FP CONTRA 64
Total FP INCONS 406
Total FP COMP 58
Total FN 851
Total Scores
MCC 0.598
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.677 ± 0.092
Sensitivity 0.532
Positive Predictive Value 0.673
Nr of predictions 34

^top



2. Individual counts for Contrafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2KE6_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 18 1110 1 0 0 1 1
2KUR_A 0.95 0.90 1.00 19 1109 0 0 0 0 2
2KUU_A 0.92 0.86 1.00 18 1110 1 0 0 1 3
2KUV_A 0.93 0.86 1.00 19 1109 0 0 0 0 3
2KUW_A 0.95 0.90 1.00 19 1109 0 0 0 0 2
2KX8_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 845 0 0 0 0 2
2L1F_A 0.98 0.96 1.00 23 2057 0 0 0 0 1
2L1F_B 0.98 0.96 1.00 24 2121 0 0 0 0 1
2L94_A 0.92 0.90 0.95 18 971 1 0 1 0 2
2LC8_A 0.45 0.35 0.58 7 1528 5 2 3 0 13
2XKV_B 0.51 0.50 0.53 10 4541 25 0 9 16 10
2XXA_G 0.13 0.12 0.15 5 5117 29 1 28 0 37
3A3A_A 0.87 0.76 1.00 28 3627 0 0 0 0 9
3GX2_A 0.77 0.63 0.96 25 4345 2 0 1 1 15
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3IYQ_A 0.34 0.37 0.32 35 60615 80 21 55 4 59
3IZ4_A 0.52 0.45 0.61 60 70777 44 4 35 5 72
3J20_2 0.58 0.51 0.66 321 1116277 172 10 157 5 312
3JYX_4 0.20 0.21 0.20 7 12211 35 6 22 7 26
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NPB_A 0.76 0.70 0.84 32 6983 8 1 5 2 14
3O58_3 0.28 0.26 0.31 9 12374 20 3 17 0 26
3PDR_A 0.69 0.60 0.80 43 12826 13 0 11 2 29
3RKF_A 0.73 0.59 0.91 20 2189 2 1 1 0 14
3SD1_A 0.57 0.48 0.69 20 3887 9 2 7 0 22
3W3S_B 0.89 0.80 1.00 32 4721 1 0 0 1 8
3ZEX_C 0.28 0.21 0.38 11 14167 22 3 15 4 41
4A1C_2 0.16 0.15 0.17 5 11751 33 5 20 8 28
4AOB_A 0.44 0.36 0.56 15 4344 13 1 11 1 27
4ENB_A 0.73 0.58 0.92 11 1263 1 1 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.73 0.58 0.92 11 1314 1 1 0 0 8
4FRG_B 0.68 0.56 0.82 18 3464 4 1 3 0 14
4FRN_A 0.65 0.56 0.77 20 5125 6 1 5 0 16

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.