CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNAalifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNAalifold(seed) & NanoFolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNAalifold(seed) NanoFolder
MCC 0.516 > 0.252
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.466 ± 0.366 > 0.316 ± 0.298
Sensitivity 0.331 > 0.266
Positive Predictive Value 0.810 > 0.248
Total TP 51 > 41
Total TN 23708 > 23606
Total FP 16 < 135
Total FP CONTRA 0 < 14
Total FP INCONS 12 < 110
Total FP COMP 4 < 11
Total FN 103 < 113
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNAalifold(seed) and NanoFolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and NanoFolder).

  2. Comparison of performance of RNAalifold(seed) and NanoFolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and NanoFolder).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAalifold(seed) and NanoFolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and NanoFolder).

  4. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAalifold(seed) and NanoFolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and NanoFolder).

^top





Performance of RNAalifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAalifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 51
Total TN 23708
Total FP 16
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 12
Total FP COMP 4
Total FN 103
Total Scores
MCC 0.516
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.466 ± 0.366
Sensitivity 0.331
Positive Predictive Value 0.810
Nr of predictions 5

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1528 12 0 12 0 20
3W3S_B 0.67 0.45 1.00 18 4735 1 0 0 1 22
4A1C_2 0.39 0.15 1.00 5 11776 2 0 0 2 28
4AOB_A 0.72 0.52 1.00 22 4349 1 0 0 1 20
4ENC_A 0.56 0.32 1.00 6 1320 0 0 0 0 13

^top



Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for NanoFolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 41
Total TN 23606
Total FP 135
Total FP CONTRA 14
Total FP INCONS 110
Total FP COMP 11
Total FN 113
Total Scores
MCC 0.252
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.316 ± 0.298
Sensitivity 0.266
Positive Predictive Value 0.248
Nr of predictions 5

^top



2. Individual counts for NanoFolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.52 0.55 0.50 11 1518 11 0 11 0 9
3W3S_B 0.17 0.18 0.18 7 4713 34 1 32 1 33
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 11728 61 12 41 8 33
4AOB_A 0.33 0.29 0.39 12 4340 20 1 18 1 30
4ENC_A 0.57 0.58 0.58 11 1307 9 0 8 1 8

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.