CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNAalifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASLOpt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNAalifold(seed) & RNASLOpt [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNAalifold(seed) RNASLOpt
MCC 0.552 > 0.426
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.525 ± 0.182 > 0.469 ± 0.185
Sensitivity 0.348 < 0.352
Positive Predictive Value 0.879 > 0.523
Total TP 102 < 103
Total TN 47763 > 47682
Total FP 18 < 114
Total FP CONTRA 1 < 16
Total FP INCONS 13 < 78
Total FP COMP 4 < 20
Total FN 191 > 190
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNAalifold(seed) and RNASLOpt. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and RNASLOpt).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAalifold(seed) and RNASLOpt. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and RNASLOpt).

^top





Performance of RNAalifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAalifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 102
Total TN 47763
Total FP 18
Total FP CONTRA 1
Total FP INCONS 13
Total FP COMP 4
Total FN 191
Total Scores
MCC 0.552
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.525 ± 0.182
Sensitivity 0.348
Positive Predictive Value 0.879
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1528 12 0 12 0 20
3W3S_B 0.67 0.45 1.00 18 4735 1 0 0 1 22
3ZEX_C 0.42 0.17 1.00 9 14187 0 0 0 0 43
4A1C_2 0.39 0.15 1.00 5 11776 2 0 0 2 28
4AOB_A 0.72 0.52 1.00 22 4349 1 0 0 1 20
4ENB_A 0.56 0.32 1.00 6 1269 0 0 0 0 13
4ENC_A 0.56 0.32 1.00 6 1320 0 0 0 0 13
4FRG_B 0.73 0.53 1.00 17 3469 0 0 0 0 15
4FRN_A 0.69 0.53 0.90 19 5130 2 1 1 0 17

^top



Performance of RNASLOpt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASLOpt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 103
Total TN 47682
Total FP 114
Total FP CONTRA 16
Total FP INCONS 78
Total FP COMP 20
Total FN 190
Total Scores
MCC 0.426
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.469 ± 0.185
Sensitivity 0.352
Positive Predictive Value 0.523
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASLOpt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.47 0.35 0.64 7 1529 4 0 4 0 13
3W3S_B 0.82 0.70 0.97 28 4724 2 0 1 1 12
3ZEX_C 0.26 0.21 0.33 11 14163 35 2 20 13 41
4A1C_2 0.23 0.24 0.22 8 11744 35 8 21 6 25
4AOB_A 0.26 0.19 0.38 8 4350 13 2 11 0 34
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10
4FRG_B 0.56 0.47 0.68 15 3464 7 1 6 0 17
4FRN_A 0.20 0.17 0.26 6 5128 17 2 15 0 30

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.