CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods

Laboratory of Structural Bioinformatics @ Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan

Home

Methods

Datasets

Rankings

RNA 2D Atlas

Help

FAQ

Contact us

RSS feeds

Twitter

Overview

Metric	RNAshapes		Murlet(seed)
MCC	0.640	>	0.514
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.678 ± 0.094	>	0.523 ± 0.070
Sensitivity	0.568	>	0.315
Positive Predictive Value	0.726	<	0.846
Total TP	536	>	297
Total TN	131647	<	132034
Total FP	270	>	60
Total FP CONTRA	22	>	6
Total FP INCONS	180	>	48
Total FP COMP	68	>	6
Total FN	407	<	646
P-value	3.56938820447e-08

^top

Performance plots

Comparison of performance of RNAshapes and Murlet(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAshapes and Murlet(seed)).
Comparison of performance of RNAshapes and Murlet(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAshapes and Murlet(seed)).
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAshapes and Murlet(seed)).
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAshapes and Murlet(seed)).
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAshapes and Murlet(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAshapes and Murlet(seed)).
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAshapes and Murlet(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAshapes and Murlet(seed)).

^top

Performance of RNAshapes - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAshapes

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	536
Total TN	131647
Total FP	270
Total FP CONTRA	22
Total FP INCONS	180
Total FP COMP	68
Total FN	407

Total Scores
MCC	0.640
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.678 ± 0.094
Sensitivity	0.568
Positive Predictive Value	0.726
Nr of predictions	30

^top

2. Individual counts for RNAshapes [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2KDQ_B	mir-TAR links to Rfam database...	0.95	0.91	1.00	10	396	0	0	0	0	1
2KE6_A	K10_TLS links to Rfam database...	0.97	0.95	1.00	18	1110	1	0	0	1	1
2KUR_A	K10_TLS links to Rfam database...	0.95	0.90	1.00	19	1109	0	0	0	0	2
2KUU_A	K10_TLS links to Rfam database...	0.92	0.86	1.00	18	1110	1	0	0	1	3
2KUV_A	K10_TLS links to Rfam database...	0.93	0.86	1.00	19	1109	0	0	0	0	3
2KUW_A	K10_TLS links to Rfam database...	0.95	0.90	1.00	19	1109	0	0	0	0	2
2L1F_A	Gammaretro_CES links to Rfam database...	0.87	0.83	0.91	20	2058	2	0	2	0	4
2L1F_B	Gammaretro_CES links to Rfam database...	0.96	0.92	1.00	23	2122	0	0	0	0	2
2L94_A	HIV_FE links to Rfam database...	0.97	0.95	1.00	19	971	0	0	0	0	1
2LC8_A	GP_knot1 links to Rfam database...	0.61	0.55	0.69	11	1524	5	0	5	0	9
2XKV_B	Bacteria_small_SRP links to Rfam database...	0.51	0.50	0.53	10	4541	22	0	9	13	10
2XXA_G	Bacteria_small_SRP links to Rfam database...	0.93	0.86	1.00	36	5115	0	0	0	0	6
3A3A_A	tRNA-Sec links to Rfam database...	0.76	0.65	0.89	24	3628	3	0	3	0	13
3GX2_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.76	0.63	0.93	25	4344	3	0	2	1	15
3IVN_B	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.78	0.61	1.00	19	2327	0	0	0	0	12
3JYX_4	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.31	0.30	0.31	10	12214	35	5	17	13	23
3LA5_A	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.76	0.59	1.00	20	2465	0	0	0	0	14
3NPB_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.77	0.63	0.94	29	6990	4	1	1	2	17
3O58_3	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.34	0.34	0.34	12	12368	37	2	21	14	23
3PDR_A	ykoK links to Rfam database...	0.67	0.56	0.80	40	12830	12	0	10	2	32
3RKF_A	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.76	0.59	1.00	20	2191	0	0	0	0	14
3SD1_A	THF links to Rfam database...	0.64	0.52	0.79	22	3888	6	1	5	0	20
3W3S_B	tRNA-Sec links to Rfam database...	0.55	0.48	0.63	19	4723	12	1	10	1	21
3ZEX_C	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.23	0.21	0.25	11	14152	41	1	32	8	41
4A1C_2	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.14	0.15	0.14	5	11746	41	5	25	11	28
4AOB_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.50	0.40	0.63	17	4344	11	2	8	1	25
4ENB_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.70	0.58	0.85	11	1262	2	1	1	0	8
4ENC_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.32	0.26	0.42	5	1314	7	1	6	0	14
4FRG_B	AdoCbl-variant links to Rfam database...	0.32	0.28	0.38	9	3462	15	0	15	0	23
4FRN_A	AdoCbl-variant links to Rfam database...	0.52	0.44	0.62	16	5125	10	2	8	0	20

^top

Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Murlet(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	297
Total TN	132034
Total FP	60
Total FP CONTRA	6
Total FP INCONS	48
Total FP COMP	6
Total FN	646

Total Scores
MCC	0.514
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.523 ± 0.070
Sensitivity	0.315
Positive Predictive Value	0.846
Nr of predictions	30

^top

2. Individual counts for Murlet(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2KDQ_B	mir-TAR links to Rfam database...	0.52	0.27	1.00	3	403	0	0	0	0	8
2KE6_A	K10_TLS links to Rfam database...	0.66	0.53	0.83	10	1116	2	0	2	0	9
2KUR_A	K10_TLS links to Rfam database...	0.63	0.48	0.83	10	1116	2	0	2	0	11
2KUU_A	K10_TLS links to Rfam database...	0.63	0.48	0.83	10	1116	2	0	2	0	11
2KUV_A	K10_TLS links to Rfam database...	0.85	0.73	1.00	16	1112	0	0	0	0	6
2KUW_A	K10_TLS links to Rfam database...	0.84	0.76	0.94	16	1111	1	0	1	0	5
2L1F_A	Gammaretro_CES links to Rfam database...	0.82	0.75	0.90	18	2060	2	0	2	0	6
2L1F_B	Gammaretro_CES links to Rfam database...	0.80	0.72	0.90	18	2125	2	0	2	0	7
2L94_A	HIV_FE links to Rfam database...	0.59	0.40	0.89	8	981	1	0	1	0	12
2LC8_A	GP_knot1 links to Rfam database...	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	1528	12	0	12	0	20
2XKV_B	Bacteria_small_SRP links to Rfam database...	0.45	0.20	1.00	4	4556	2	0	0	2	16
2XXA_G	Bacteria_small_SRP links to Rfam database...	0.38	0.14	1.00	6	5145	0	0	0	0	36
3A3A_A	tRNA-Sec links to Rfam database...	0.57	0.32	1.00	12	3643	0	0	0	0	25
3GX2_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.59	0.35	1.00	14	4357	1	0	0	1	26
3IVN_B	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.53	0.39	0.75	12	2330	4	2	2	0	19
3JYX_4	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.23	0.09	0.60	3	12241	4	0	2	2	30
3LA5_A	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.58	0.41	0.82	14	2468	3	1	2	0	20
3NPB_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.49	0.28	0.87	13	7006	2	1	1	0	33
3O58_3	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.45	0.20	1.00	7	12396	0	0	0	0	28
3PDR_A	ykoK links to Rfam database...	0.44	0.19	1.00	14	12866	0	0	0	0	58
3RKF_A	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.53	0.35	0.80	12	2196	3	1	2	0	22
3SD1_A	THF links to Rfam database...	0.47	0.26	0.85	11	3903	2	0	2	0	31
3W3S_B	tRNA-Sec links to Rfam database...	0.41	0.23	0.75	9	4741	3	0	3	0	31
3ZEX_C	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.37	0.13	1.00	7	14189	0	0	0	0	45
4A1C_2	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.46	0.21	1.00	7	11774	0	0	0	0	26
4AOB_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.58	0.33	1.00	14	4357	1	0	0	1	28
4ENB_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.56	0.32	1.00	6	1269	0	0	0	0	13
4ENC_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.56	0.32	1.00	6	1320	0	0	0	0	13
4FRG_B	AdoCbl-variant links to Rfam database...	0.15	0.09	0.25	3	3474	9	0	9	0	29
4FRN_A	AdoCbl-variant links to Rfam database...	0.58	0.39	0.88	14	5135	2	1	1	0	22

^top

Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.

Table of contents:

Overview

Performance plots

Performance of RNAshapes - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAshapes

2. Individual counts for RNAshapes [ download as .csv ]

Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Murlet(seed)

2. Individual counts for Murlet(seed) [ download as .csv ]