CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNAwolf - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Vsfold5 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNAwolf & Vsfold5 [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNAwolf Vsfold5
MCC 0.434 > 0.427
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.515 ± 0.088 < 0.524 ± 0.089
Sensitivity 0.406 > 0.369
Positive Predictive Value 0.471 < 0.503
Total TP 627 > 570
Total TN 197294 < 197490
Total FP 774 > 612
Total FP CONTRA 76 > 51
Total FP INCONS 627 > 513
Total FP COMP 71 > 48
Total FN 916 < 973
P-value 0.00297289556633

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNAwolf and Vsfold5. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAwolf and Vsfold5).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAwolf and Vsfold5).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAwolf and Vsfold5. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAwolf and Vsfold5).

^top





Performance of RNAwolf - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAwolf

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 627
Total TN 197294
Total FP 774
Total FP CONTRA 76
Total FP INCONS 627
Total FP COMP 71
Total FN 916
Total Scores
MCC 0.434
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.515 ± 0.088
Sensitivity 0.406
Positive Predictive Value 0.471
Nr of predictions 58

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAwolf [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A 0.52 0.50 0.56 10 1522 8 0 8 0 10
2LDL_A - 0.74 0.64 0.88 7 343 1 0 1 0 4
2LDT_A - 0.86 0.80 0.92 12 452 1 0 1 0 3
2LHP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 650 1 0 0 1 0
2LI4_A - 0.97 0.94 1.00 15 481 0 0 0 0 1
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 343 3 0 0 3 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 266 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 0.81 0.74 0.88 29 6072 8 0 4 4 10
2LU0_A - 0.97 0.94 1.00 15 1161 3 0 0 3 1
2LWK_A - 0.37 0.38 0.38 5 483 9 0 8 1 8
2M58_A - 0.51 0.47 0.57 8 1639 6 3 3 0 9
2YIE_X - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1364 15 4 10 1 12
2YIE_Z - 0.43 0.42 0.45 5 1529 9 1 5 3 7
3AMU_B 0.68 0.63 0.74 17 2980 9 0 6 3 10
3J0L_h - 0.33 0.30 0.37 13 6070 24 0 22 2 30
3J0L_8 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 7 183 0 0 0 0 1
3J0L_a - 0.18 0.19 0.20 3 1113 12 1 11 0 13
3J0L_1 - 0.68 0.63 0.75 12 1209 5 0 4 1 7
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1214 11 0 11 0 17
3J0L_g - 0.16 0.25 0.11 1 456 8 6 2 0 3
3J0L_2 - 0.11 0.12 0.11 4 6181 34 5 26 3 29
3J16_L 0.45 0.40 0.52 12 2752 11 0 11 0 18
3J20_1 0.46 0.52 0.41 12 2897 17 6 11 0 11
3J20_0 0.40 0.40 0.41 12 2821 18 0 17 1 18
3J2C_O - 0.40 0.37 0.44 23 10244 30 0 29 1 40
3J2L_3 0.55 0.49 0.62 26 7833 18 0 16 2 27
3J3D_C 0.79 0.75 0.84 21 2750 5 2 2 1 7
3J3E_7 0.41 0.35 0.49 19 7101 20 1 19 0 35
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7470 42 4 29 9 33
3J3F_7 0.21 0.20 0.23 10 7216 34 2 32 0 40
3J3F_8 0.23 0.25 0.21 9 12204 45 5 28 12 27
3J3V_B 0.43 0.37 0.51 21 6980 20 2 18 0 36
3RKF_A 0.72 0.62 0.84 21 2186 4 0 4 0 13
3SD1_A 0.46 0.43 0.50 18 3880 18 0 18 0 24
3SIU_F - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 372 0 0 0 0 5
3SN2_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 394 0 0 0 0 0
3TRZ_Z - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 205 0 0 0 0 1
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 247 2 0 0 2 0
3TS2_V - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 270 7 0 6 1 5
3U4M_B - 0.44 0.38 0.52 14 3133 13 0 13 0 23
3UZL_B 0.72 0.59 0.88 22 3545 4 1 2 1 15
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 13 617 1 0 0 1 0
3W3S_B 0.68 0.63 0.74 25 4719 10 0 9 1 15
3ZEX_D 0.20 0.18 0.22 9 6980 32 3 29 0 40
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21876 69 10 59 0 77
3ZND_W 0.50 0.48 0.52 11 2982 13 0 10 3 12
4A1C_3 0.23 0.20 0.28 11 7101 28 2 26 0 43
4A1C_2 0.08 0.09 0.08 3 11741 46 10 27 9 30
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.23 0.19 0.30 8 4344 20 1 18 1 34
4ATO_G - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 520 8 1 7 0 10
4ENB_A 0.35 0.32 0.40 6 1260 9 1 8 0 13
4ENC_A 0.34 0.32 0.38 6 1310 10 1 9 0 13
4FRG_B 0.56 0.50 0.64 16 3461 10 1 8 1 16
4FRN_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 5119 32 0 32 0 36
4JF2_A 0.67 0.58 0.78 18 2827 5 3 2 0 13
4JRC_A - 0.58 0.52 0.67 12 1522 6 0 6 0 11

^top



Performance of Vsfold5 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Vsfold5

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 570
Total TN 197490
Total FP 612
Total FP CONTRA 51
Total FP INCONS 513
Total FP COMP 48
Total FN 973
Total Scores
MCC 0.427
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.524 ± 0.089
Sensitivity 0.369
Positive Predictive Value 0.503
Nr of predictions 58

^top



2. Individual counts for Vsfold5 [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1527 13 0 13 0 20
2LDL_A - 0.85 0.73 1.00 8 343 1 0 0 1 3
2LDT_A - 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 454 0 0 0 0 4
2LHP_A - 0.97 0.94 1.00 15 651 0 0 0 0 1
2LI4_A - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 2
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 343 2 0 0 2 0
2LK3_A - 0.89 0.80 1.00 8 268 0 0 0 0 2
2LKR_A - 0.27 0.23 0.32 9 6077 19 2 17 0 30
2LU0_A - 0.69 0.63 0.77 10 1163 3 0 3 0 6
2LWK_A - 0.83 0.77 0.91 10 485 1 0 1 0 3
2M58_A - 0.32 0.24 0.44 4 1644 5 1 4 0 13
2YIE_X - 0.30 0.33 0.29 4 1364 10 2 8 0 8
2YIE_Z - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1529 11 3 8 0 12
3AMU_B 0.67 0.59 0.76 16 2982 7 0 5 2 11
3J0L_h - 0.18 0.14 0.24 6 6080 19 1 18 0 37
3J0L_8 - 0.70 0.50 1.00 4 186 0 0 0 0 4
3J0L_a - 0.39 0.31 0.50 5 1118 5 2 3 0 11
3J0L_1 - 0.27 0.21 0.36 4 1214 7 1 6 0 15
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1212 13 0 13 0 17
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 461 4 1 3 0 4
3J0L_2 - 0.35 0.33 0.37 11 6186 21 3 16 2 22
3J16_L 0.82 0.67 1.00 20 2755 0 0 0 0 10
3J20_1 0.71 0.70 0.73 16 2904 6 0 6 0 7
3J20_0 0.67 0.57 0.81 17 2829 5 1 3 1 13
3J2C_O - 0.30 0.24 0.39 15 10258 24 0 23 1 48
3J2L_3 0.56 0.45 0.71 24 7841 13 1 9 3 29
3J3D_C 0.60 0.54 0.68 15 2753 7 0 7 0 13
3J3E_7 0.47 0.37 0.61 20 7107 13 0 13 0 34
3J3E_8 0.06 0.06 0.08 2 7477 31 5 19 7 31
3J3F_7 0.21 0.18 0.26 9 7226 25 1 24 0 41
3J3F_8 0.33 0.33 0.33 12 12210 35 5 19 11 24
3J3V_B 0.16 0.12 0.21 7 6988 26 1 25 0 50
3RKF_A 0.75 0.65 0.88 22 2186 3 0 3 0 12
3SD1_A 0.11 0.10 0.15 4 3890 22 0 22 0 38
3SIU_F - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 372 0 0 0 0 5
3SN2_B 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 395 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 205 1 0 0 1 1
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 247 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 271 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.38 0.32 0.46 12 3134 14 0 14 0 25
3UZL_B 0.16 0.14 0.20 5 3545 20 1 19 0 32
3VJR_D - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 618 0 0 0 0 1
3W3S_B 0.76 0.70 0.82 28 4719 7 1 5 1 12
3ZEX_D 0.08 0.06 0.11 3 6994 24 0 24 0 46
3ZEX_E - 0.07 0.06 0.08 5 21886 54 5 49 0 72
3ZND_W 0.41 0.39 0.43 9 2982 14 2 10 2 14
4A1C_3 0.26 0.22 0.32 12 7103 25 2 23 0 42
4A1C_2 0.24 0.24 0.24 8 11748 37 3 22 12 25
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.18 0.14 0.25 6 4347 19 1 17 1 36
4ATO_G - 0.56 0.60 0.55 6 517 5 1 4 0 4
4ENB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 15 1260 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.86 0.79 0.94 15 1310 1 1 0 0 4
4FRG_B 0.56 0.47 0.68 15 3464 7 1 6 0 17
4FRN_A 0.13 0.11 0.17 4 5128 19 2 17 0 32
4JF2_A 0.84 0.77 0.92 24 2824 2 1 1 0 7
4JRC_A - 0.25 0.22 0.31 5 1524 11 0 11 0 18

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.