CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RSpredict(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Vsfold4 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RSpredict(20) & Vsfold4 [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RSpredict(20) Vsfold4
MCC 0.554 > 0.459
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.539 ± 0.082 > 0.495 ± 0.091
Sensitivity 0.433 > 0.387
Positive Predictive Value 0.713 > 0.549
Total TP 615 > 550
Total TN 265947 > 265808
Total FP 296 < 528
Total FP CONTRA 50 = 50
Total FP INCONS 198 < 402
Total FP COMP 48 < 76
Total FN 805 < 870
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RSpredict(20) and Vsfold4. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RSpredict(20) and Vsfold4).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RSpredict(20) and Vsfold4).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RSpredict(20) and Vsfold4. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RSpredict(20) and Vsfold4).

^top





Performance of RSpredict(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RSpredict(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 615
Total TN 265947
Total FP 296
Total FP CONTRA 50
Total FP INCONS 198
Total FP COMP 48
Total FN 805
Total Scores
MCC 0.554
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.539 ± 0.082
Sensitivity 0.433
Positive Predictive Value 0.713
Nr of predictions 38

^top



2. Individual counts for RSpredict(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.85 0.73 1.00 8 398 0 0 0 0 3
2L94_A 0.55 0.50 0.63 10 974 6 0 6 0 10
2WRQ_Y 0.57 0.59 0.56 10 2832 11 5 3 3 7
2XKV_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4556 4 0 4 0 20
2XQD_Y 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 6
2XXA_G 0.46 0.21 1.00 9 5142 0 0 0 0 33
3A2K_C 0.78 0.68 0.90 19 2905 2 0 2 0 9
3AMU_B 0.61 0.41 0.92 11 2991 1 0 1 0 16
3GX2_A 0.33 0.15 0.75 6 4363 2 0 2 0 34
3IVN_B 0.78 0.65 0.95 20 2325 1 0 1 0 11
3IZ4_A 0.53 0.43 0.65 57 70788 35 8 23 4 75
3IZF_C 0.75 0.61 0.92 33 6867 3 1 2 0 21
3J20_0 0.80 0.67 0.95 20 2829 2 0 1 1 10
3J20_1 0.66 0.48 0.92 11 2914 1 0 1 0 12
3J2L_3 0.58 0.40 0.84 21 7850 5 0 4 1 32
3J3D_C 0.76 0.64 0.90 18 2755 2 0 2 0 10
3J3E_7 0.63 0.50 0.79 27 7106 7 1 6 0 27
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7484 19 4 15 0 33
3J3F_7 0.79 0.68 0.92 34 7223 3 0 3 0 16
3J3F_8 0.39 0.33 0.46 12 12220 23 2 12 9 24
3JYV_7 0.77 0.63 0.95 20 2829 1 0 1 0 12
3JYX_3 0.61 0.56 0.68 15 6306 13 0 7 6 12
3JYX_4 0.28 0.27 0.30 9 12216 33 5 16 12 24
3LA5_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2465 0 0 0 0 14
3NPB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7015 6 1 5 0 46
3O58_3 0.32 0.34 0.30 12 12363 28 12 16 0 23
3O58_2 0.76 0.76 0.76 29 7222 10 3 6 1 9
3PDR_A 0.67 0.49 0.92 35 12842 5 0 3 2 37
3RKF_A 0.77 0.62 0.95 21 2189 1 0 1 0 13
3SD1_A 0.68 0.60 0.78 25 3884 7 1 6 0 17
3ZEX_D 0.76 0.65 0.89 32 6985 4 1 3 0 17
3ZND_W 0.34 0.22 0.56 5 2994 7 0 4 3 18
4A1C_2 0.19 0.18 0.20 6 11751 30 6 18 6 27
4A1C_3 0.48 0.33 0.69 18 7114 8 0 8 0 36
4AOB_A 0.28 0.14 0.55 6 4360 5 0 5 0 36
4ENB_A 0.48 0.32 0.75 6 1267 2 0 2 0 13
4ENC_A 0.45 0.32 0.67 6 1317 3 0 3 0 13
4FRG_B 0.17 0.09 0.33 3 3477 6 0 6 0 29

^top



Performance of Vsfold4 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Vsfold4

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 550
Total TN 265808
Total FP 528
Total FP CONTRA 50
Total FP INCONS 402
Total FP COMP 76
Total FN 870
Total Scores
MCC 0.459
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.495 ± 0.091
Sensitivity 0.387
Positive Predictive Value 0.549
Nr of predictions 38

^top



2. Individual counts for Vsfold4 [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2L94_A 0.92 0.85 1.00 17 973 0 0 0 0 3
2WRQ_Y 0.53 0.53 0.53 9 2833 12 5 3 4 8
2XKV_B -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4533 27 8 19 0 20
2XQD_Y 0.86 0.74 1.00 20 2830 0 0 0 0 7
2XXA_G -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 5122 29 1 28 0 42
3A2K_C 0.84 0.71 1.00 20 2906 0 0 0 0 8
3AMU_B 0.64 0.56 0.75 15 2983 7 0 5 2 12
3GX2_A 0.50 0.40 0.64 16 4346 10 0 9 1 24
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3IZ4_A 0.36 0.31 0.43 41 70780 59 7 48 4 91
3IZF_C 0.69 0.56 0.86 30 6868 5 0 5 0 24
3J20_0 0.84 0.70 1.00 21 2829 1 0 0 1 9
3J20_1 0.71 0.70 0.73 16 2904 6 0 6 0 7
3J2L_3 0.57 0.45 0.73 24 7842 12 1 8 3 29
3J3D_C 0.44 0.39 0.50 11 2753 11 1 10 0 17
3J3E_7 0.48 0.35 0.66 19 7111 10 0 10 0 35
3J3E_8 0.07 0.06 0.09 2 7481 32 2 18 12 31
3J3F_7 0.21 0.18 0.26 9 7226 25 0 25 0 41
3J3F_8 0.33 0.31 0.37 11 12216 27 4 15 8 25
3JYV_7 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2831 19 0 19 0 32
3JYX_3 0.60 0.56 0.65 15 6305 11 4 4 3 12
3JYX_4 0.10 0.09 0.12 3 12220 33 2 21 10 30
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NPB_A 0.61 0.50 0.74 23 6990 9 0 8 1 23
3O58_3 0.09 0.09 0.10 3 12373 35 5 22 8 32
3O58_2 0.47 0.42 0.53 16 7230 16 3 11 2 22
3PDR_A 0.57 0.44 0.74 32 12837 13 0 11 2 40
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.19 0.17 0.24 7 3887 22 1 21 0 35
3ZEX_D 0.55 0.45 0.69 22 6989 10 0 10 0 27
3ZND_W 0.41 0.39 0.43 9 2982 14 2 10 2 14
4A1C_2 0.28 0.24 0.33 8 11757 28 0 16 12 25
4A1C_3 0.26 0.22 0.32 12 7103 25 2 23 0 42
4AOB_A 0.42 0.33 0.54 14 4345 13 1 11 1 28
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1317 0 0 0 0 10
4FRG_B 0.56 0.47 0.68 15 3464 7 1 6 0 17

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.