CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RSpredict(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Vsfold5 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RSpredict(20) & Vsfold5 [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RSpredict(20) Vsfold5
MCC 0.554 > 0.417
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.539 ± 0.082 > 0.458 ± 0.097
Sensitivity 0.433 > 0.358
Positive Predictive Value 0.713 > 0.493
Total TP 615 > 508
Total TN 265947 > 265779
Total FP 296 < 598
Total FP CONTRA 50 < 68
Total FP INCONS 198 < 455
Total FP COMP 48 < 75
Total FN 805 < 912
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RSpredict(20) and Vsfold5. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RSpredict(20) and Vsfold5).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RSpredict(20) and Vsfold5).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RSpredict(20) and Vsfold5. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RSpredict(20) and Vsfold5).

^top





Performance of RSpredict(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RSpredict(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 615
Total TN 265947
Total FP 296
Total FP CONTRA 50
Total FP INCONS 198
Total FP COMP 48
Total FN 805
Total Scores
MCC 0.554
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.539 ± 0.082
Sensitivity 0.433
Positive Predictive Value 0.713
Nr of predictions 38

^top



2. Individual counts for RSpredict(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.85 0.73 1.00 8 398 0 0 0 0 3
2L94_A 0.55 0.50 0.63 10 974 6 0 6 0 10
2WRQ_Y 0.57 0.59 0.56 10 2832 11 5 3 3 7
2XKV_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4556 4 0 4 0 20
2XQD_Y 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 6
2XXA_G 0.46 0.21 1.00 9 5142 0 0 0 0 33
3A2K_C 0.78 0.68 0.90 19 2905 2 0 2 0 9
3AMU_B 0.61 0.41 0.92 11 2991 1 0 1 0 16
3GX2_A 0.33 0.15 0.75 6 4363 2 0 2 0 34
3IVN_B 0.78 0.65 0.95 20 2325 1 0 1 0 11
3IZ4_A 0.53 0.43 0.65 57 70788 35 8 23 4 75
3IZF_C 0.75 0.61 0.92 33 6867 3 1 2 0 21
3J20_0 0.80 0.67 0.95 20 2829 2 0 1 1 10
3J20_1 0.66 0.48 0.92 11 2914 1 0 1 0 12
3J2L_3 0.58 0.40 0.84 21 7850 5 0 4 1 32
3J3D_C 0.76 0.64 0.90 18 2755 2 0 2 0 10
3J3E_7 0.63 0.50 0.79 27 7106 7 1 6 0 27
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7484 19 4 15 0 33
3J3F_7 0.79 0.68 0.92 34 7223 3 0 3 0 16
3J3F_8 0.39 0.33 0.46 12 12220 23 2 12 9 24
3JYV_7 0.77 0.63 0.95 20 2829 1 0 1 0 12
3JYX_3 0.61 0.56 0.68 15 6306 13 0 7 6 12
3JYX_4 0.28 0.27 0.30 9 12216 33 5 16 12 24
3LA5_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2465 0 0 0 0 14
3NPB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7015 6 1 5 0 46
3O58_3 0.32 0.34 0.30 12 12363 28 12 16 0 23
3O58_2 0.76 0.76 0.76 29 7222 10 3 6 1 9
3PDR_A 0.67 0.49 0.92 35 12842 5 0 3 2 37
3RKF_A 0.77 0.62 0.95 21 2189 1 0 1 0 13
3SD1_A 0.68 0.60 0.78 25 3884 7 1 6 0 17
3ZEX_D 0.76 0.65 0.89 32 6985 4 1 3 0 17
3ZND_W 0.34 0.22 0.56 5 2994 7 0 4 3 18
4A1C_2 0.19 0.18 0.20 6 11751 30 6 18 6 27
4A1C_3 0.48 0.33 0.69 18 7114 8 0 8 0 36
4AOB_A 0.28 0.14 0.55 6 4360 5 0 5 0 36
4ENB_A 0.48 0.32 0.75 6 1267 2 0 2 0 13
4ENC_A 0.45 0.32 0.67 6 1317 3 0 3 0 13
4FRG_B 0.17 0.09 0.33 3 3477 6 0 6 0 29

^top



Performance of Vsfold5 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Vsfold5

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 508
Total TN 265779
Total FP 598
Total FP CONTRA 68
Total FP INCONS 455
Total FP COMP 75
Total FN 912
Total Scores
MCC 0.417
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.458 ± 0.097
Sensitivity 0.358
Positive Predictive Value 0.493
Nr of predictions 38

^top



2. Individual counts for Vsfold5 [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.90 0.82 1.00 9 397 0 0 0 0 2
2L94_A 0.95 0.90 1.00 18 972 0 0 0 0 2
2WRQ_Y 0.53 0.53 0.53 9 2833 12 5 3 4 8
2XKV_B -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4528 32 12 20 0 20
2XQD_Y 0.86 0.74 1.00 20 2830 0 0 0 0 7
2XXA_G -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 5120 31 2 29 0 42
3A2K_C 0.84 0.71 1.00 20 2906 0 0 0 0 8
3AMU_B 0.67 0.59 0.76 16 2982 7 0 5 2 11
3GX2_A 0.51 0.40 0.67 16 4347 9 0 8 1 24
3IVN_B 0.76 0.58 1.00 18 2328 0 0 0 0 13
3IZ4_A 0.29 0.24 0.36 32 70787 62 8 49 5 100
3IZF_C 0.70 0.56 0.88 30 6869 4 0 4 0 24
3J20_0 0.67 0.57 0.81 17 2829 5 1 3 1 13
3J20_1 0.71 0.70 0.73 16 2904 6 0 6 0 7
3J2L_3 0.56 0.45 0.71 24 7841 13 1 9 3 29
3J3D_C 0.60 0.54 0.68 15 2753 7 0 7 0 13
3J3E_7 0.47 0.37 0.61 20 7107 13 0 13 0 34
3J3E_8 0.06 0.06 0.08 2 7477 31 5 19 7 31
3J3F_7 0.21 0.18 0.26 9 7226 25 1 24 0 41
3J3F_8 0.33 0.33 0.33 12 12210 35 5 19 11 24
3JYV_7 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2831 19 0 19 0 32
3JYX_3 0.17 0.15 0.20 4 6308 18 4 12 2 23
3JYX_4 0.31 0.30 0.31 10 12214 32 3 19 10 23
3LA5_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2469 16 0 16 0 34
3NPB_A 0.57 0.46 0.72 21 6992 9 1 7 1 25
3O58_3 0.39 0.37 0.41 13 12371 28 7 12 9 22
3O58_2 0.45 0.42 0.48 16 7227 19 3 14 2 22
3PDR_A 0.57 0.44 0.74 32 12837 13 0 11 2 40
3RKF_A 0.75 0.65 0.88 22 2186 3 0 3 0 12
3SD1_A 0.11 0.10 0.15 4 3890 22 0 22 0 38
3ZEX_D 0.08 0.06 0.11 3 6994 24 0 24 0 46
3ZND_W 0.41 0.39 0.43 9 2982 14 2 10 2 14
4A1C_2 0.24 0.24 0.24 8 11748 37 3 22 12 25
4A1C_3 0.26 0.22 0.32 12 7103 25 2 23 0 42
4AOB_A 0.18 0.14 0.25 6 4347 19 1 17 1 36
4ENB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 15 1260 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.86 0.79 0.94 15 1310 1 1 0 0 4
4FRG_B 0.56 0.47 0.68 15 3464 7 1 6 0 17

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.