CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Sfold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Carnac(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Sfold & Carnac(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Sfold Carnac(20)
MCC 0.587 > 0.577
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.598 ± 0.073 > 0.542 ± 0.082
Sensitivity 0.490 > 0.372
Positive Predictive Value 0.708 < 0.897
Total TP 639 > 486
Total TN 247557 < 247918
Total FP 345 > 80
Total FP CONTRA 28 > 9
Total FP INCONS 236 > 47
Total FP COMP 81 > 24
Total FN 666 < 819
P-value 1.10039559051e-07

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Sfold and Carnac(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Sfold and Carnac(20)).

  2. Comparison of performance of Sfold and Carnac(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Sfold and Carnac(20)).

  3. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Sfold and Carnac(20)).

  4. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Sfold and Carnac(20)).

  5. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Sfold and Carnac(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Sfold and Carnac(20)).

  6. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Sfold and Carnac(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Sfold and Carnac(20)).

^top





Performance of Sfold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Sfold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 639
Total TN 247557
Total FP 345
Total FP CONTRA 28
Total FP INCONS 236
Total FP COMP 81
Total FN 666
Total Scores
MCC 0.587
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.598 ± 0.073
Sensitivity 0.490
Positive Predictive Value 0.708
Nr of predictions 34

^top



2. Individual counts for Sfold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2L94_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 971 0 0 0 0 1
2WRQ_Y 0.53 0.53 0.53 9 2833 13 5 3 5 8
2XKV_B 0.51 0.50 0.53 10 4541 23 0 9 14 10
2XQD_Y 0.77 0.67 0.90 18 2830 2 0 2 0 9
2XXA_G 0.36 0.31 0.43 13 5121 17 1 16 0 29
3A2K_C 0.42 0.39 0.46 11 2902 13 2 11 0 17
3AMU_B 0.70 0.59 0.84 16 2984 5 0 3 2 11
3G4S_9 0.51 0.39 0.69 22 7349 10 1 9 0 35
3GX2_A 0.72 0.55 0.96 22 4348 2 0 1 1 18
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3IZ4_A 0.52 0.42 0.65 56 70790 31 3 27 1 76
3IZF_C 0.71 0.61 0.83 33 6863 7 0 7 0 21
3J20_0 0.43 0.40 0.48 12 2825 14 0 13 1 18
3J20_1 0.73 0.70 0.76 16 2905 6 0 5 1 7
3J2L_3 0.62 0.53 0.74 28 7837 12 0 10 2 25
3JYV_7 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2834 16 0 16 0 32
3JYX_4 0.35 0.30 0.42 10 12222 23 3 11 9 23
3JYX_3 0.62 0.63 0.61 17 6300 19 1 10 8 10
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NPB_A 0.77 0.65 0.91 30 6988 6 1 2 3 16
3O58_2 0.74 0.74 0.74 28 7222 11 3 7 1 10
3O58_3 0.43 0.34 0.55 12 12381 17 0 10 7 23
3PDR_A 0.69 0.56 0.85 40 12833 9 0 7 2 32
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.65 0.50 0.84 21 3891 4 1 3 0 21
3ZEX_C 0.32 0.21 0.48 11 14173 26 1 11 14 41
3ZEX_D 0.74 0.63 0.86 31 6985 5 0 5 0 18
4A1C_3 0.69 0.57 0.84 31 7103 6 1 5 0 23
4A1C_2 0.16 0.15 0.17 5 11751 34 2 23 9 28
4AOB_A 0.50 0.40 0.63 17 4344 11 2 8 1 25
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.51 0.26 1.00 5 1321 0 0 0 0 14
4FRG_B 0.62 0.47 0.83 15 3468 3 1 2 0 17

^top



Performance of Carnac(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Carnac(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 486
Total TN 247918
Total FP 80
Total FP CONTRA 9
Total FP INCONS 47
Total FP COMP 24
Total FN 819
Total Scores
MCC 0.577
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.542 ± 0.082
Sensitivity 0.372
Positive Predictive Value 0.897
Nr of predictions 34

^top



2. Individual counts for Carnac(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 400 0 0 0 0 5
2L94_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 990 0 0 0 0 20
2WRQ_Y 0.57 0.59 0.56 10 2832 13 5 3 5 7
2XKV_B 0.32 0.10 1.00 2 4558 1 0 0 1 18
2XQD_Y 0.79 0.63 1.00 17 2833 0 0 0 0 10
2XXA_G 0.27 0.07 1.00 3 5148 0 0 0 0 39
3A2K_C 0.78 0.61 1.00 17 2909 0 0 0 0 11
3AMU_B 0.69 0.59 0.80 16 2983 6 0 4 2 11
3G4S_9 0.50 0.28 0.89 16 7363 2 1 1 0 41
3GX2_A 0.57 0.33 1.00 13 4358 0 0 0 0 27
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3IZ4_A 0.47 0.23 0.94 31 70843 2 0 2 0 101
3IZF_C 0.73 0.56 0.97 30 6872 1 0 1 0 24
3J20_0 0.62 0.53 0.73 16 2828 7 0 6 1 14
3J20_1 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2909 0 0 0 0 6
3J2L_3 0.46 0.34 0.64 18 7847 11 0 10 1 35
3JYV_7 0.68 0.50 0.94 16 2833 1 0 1 0 16
3JYX_4 0.46 0.21 1.00 7 12239 2 0 0 2 26
3JYX_3 0.64 0.56 0.75 15 6308 10 1 4 5 12
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NPB_A 0.44 0.20 1.00 9 7012 2 0 0 2 37
3O58_2 0.83 0.71 0.96 27 7232 2 0 1 1 11
3O58_3 0.51 0.26 1.00 9 12394 0 0 0 0 26
3PDR_A 0.62 0.40 0.97 29 12850 3 0 1 2 43
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.60 0.38 0.94 16 3899 1 0 1 0 26
3ZEX_C 0.31 0.13 0.70 7 14186 3 1 2 0 45
3ZEX_D 0.73 0.53 1.00 26 6995 0 0 0 0 23
4A1C_3 0.67 0.52 0.88 28 7108 4 0 4 0 26
4A1C_2 0.33 0.15 0.71 5 11774 3 0 2 1 28
4AOB_A 0.49 0.33 0.74 14 4352 6 1 4 1 28
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1275 0 0 0 0 19
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1326 0 0 0 0 19
4FRG_B 0.43 0.19 1.00 6 3480 0 0 0 0 26

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.