CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Sfold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Sfold & Multilign(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Sfold Multilign(seed)
MCC 0.584 > 0.558
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.606 ± 0.168 > 0.538 ± 0.265
Sensitivity 0.462 > 0.434
Positive Predictive Value 0.746 > 0.725
Total TP 132 > 124
Total TN 36951 < 36957
Total FP 61 > 49
Total FP CONTRA 7 > 6
Total FP INCONS 38 < 41
Total FP COMP 16 > 2
Total FN 154 < 162
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Sfold and Multilign(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Sfold and Multilign(seed)).

  2. Comparison of performance of Sfold and Multilign(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Sfold and Multilign(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Sfold and Multilign(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Sfold and Multilign(seed)).

  4. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Sfold and Multilign(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Sfold and Multilign(seed)).

^top





Performance of Sfold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Sfold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 132
Total TN 36951
Total FP 61
Total FP CONTRA 7
Total FP INCONS 38
Total FP COMP 16
Total FN 154
Total Scores
MCC 0.584
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.606 ± 0.168
Sensitivity 0.462
Positive Predictive Value 0.746
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for Sfold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 971 0 0 0 0 1
2LC8_A 0.45 0.35 0.58 7 1528 5 0 5 0 13
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.65 0.50 0.84 21 3891 4 1 3 0 21
3W3S_B 0.57 0.53 0.64 21 4720 13 1 11 1 19
3ZEX_C 0.32 0.21 0.48 11 14173 26 1 11 14 41
4AOB_A 0.50 0.40 0.63 17 4344 11 2 8 1 25
4FRN_A 0.63 0.44 0.89 16 5133 2 2 0 0 20

^top



Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 124
Total TN 36957
Total FP 49
Total FP CONTRA 6
Total FP INCONS 41
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 162
Total Scores
MCC 0.558
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.538 ± 0.265
Sensitivity 0.434
Positive Predictive Value 0.725
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.92 0.85 1.00 17 973 0 0 0 0 3
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1528 12 1 11 0 20
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.55 0.45 0.68 19 3888 9 1 8 0 23
3W3S_B 0.84 0.73 0.97 29 4723 2 0 1 1 11
3ZEX_C 0.39 0.27 0.58 14 14172 10 3 7 0 38
4AOB_A 0.61 0.45 0.83 19 4348 5 0 4 1 23
4FRN_A 0.24 0.17 0.35 6 5134 11 1 10 0 30

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.