CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Carnac(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(20) & Carnac(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(20) Carnac(20)
MCC 0.655 > 0.547
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.670 ± 0.108 > 0.463 ± 0.158
Sensitivity 0.529 > 0.357
Positive Predictive Value 0.816 < 0.844
Total TP 280 > 189
Total TN 74024 < 74143
Total FP 82 > 41
Total FP CONTRA 5 > 2
Total FP INCONS 58 > 33
Total FP COMP 19 > 6
Total FN 249 < 340
P-value 2.8150742666e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(20) and Carnac(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and Carnac(20)).

  2. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(20) and Carnac(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and Carnac(20)).

  3. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and Carnac(20)).

  4. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and Carnac(20)).

  5. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(20) and Carnac(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and Carnac(20)).

  6. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(20) and Carnac(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and Carnac(20)).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 280
Total TN 74024
Total FP 82
Total FP CONTRA 5
Total FP INCONS 58
Total FP COMP 19
Total FN 249
Total Scores
MCC 0.655
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.670 ± 0.108
Sensitivity 0.529
Positive Predictive Value 0.816
Nr of predictions 15

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.92 0.90 0.95 18 971 1 0 1 0 2
3AMU_B 0.70 0.59 0.84 16 2984 5 0 3 2 11
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J20_0 0.66 0.57 0.77 17 2828 6 0 5 1 13
3J2L_3 0.74 0.58 0.94 31 7842 5 0 2 3 22
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.59 0.48 0.74 20 3889 7 1 6 0 22
3ZEX_C 0.39 0.27 0.56 14 14171 14 2 9 3 38
3ZEX_D 0.76 0.63 0.91 31 6987 3 0 3 0 18
4A1C_3 0.69 0.57 0.84 31 7103 6 0 6 0 23
4A1C_2 0.18 0.15 0.21 5 11757 28 0 19 9 28
4AOB_A 0.56 0.40 0.77 17 4349 6 1 4 1 25
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10
4FRG_B 0.81 0.66 1.00 21 3465 0 0 0 0 11

^top



Performance of Carnac(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Carnac(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 189
Total TN 74143
Total FP 41
Total FP CONTRA 2
Total FP INCONS 33
Total FP COMP 6
Total FN 340
Total Scores
MCC 0.547
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.463 ± 0.158
Sensitivity 0.357
Positive Predictive Value 0.844
Nr of predictions 15

^top



2. Individual counts for Carnac(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 990 0 0 0 0 20
3AMU_B 0.69 0.59 0.80 16 2983 6 0 4 2 11
3J20_1 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2909 0 0 0 0 6
3J20_0 0.62 0.53 0.73 16 2828 7 0 6 1 14
3J2L_3 0.46 0.34 0.64 18 7847 11 0 10 1 35
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.60 0.38 0.94 16 3899 1 0 1 0 26
3ZEX_C 0.31 0.13 0.70 7 14186 3 1 2 0 45
3ZEX_D 0.73 0.53 1.00 26 6995 0 0 0 0 23
4A1C_3 0.67 0.52 0.88 28 7108 4 0 4 0 26
4A1C_2 0.33 0.15 0.71 5 11774 3 0 2 1 28
4AOB_A 0.49 0.33 0.74 14 4352 6 1 4 1 28
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1275 0 0 0 0 19
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1326 0 0 0 0 19
4FRG_B 0.43 0.19 1.00 6 3480 0 0 0 0 26

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.