CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CentroidFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(20) & CentroidFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(20) CentroidFold
MCC 0.625 > 0.487
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.633 ± 0.098 > 0.511 ± 0.117
Sensitivity 0.518 > 0.413
Positive Predictive Value 0.759 > 0.581
Total TP 390 > 311
Total TN 113780 > 113759
Total FP 169 < 252
Total FP CONTRA 11 < 22
Total FP INCONS 113 < 202
Total FP COMP 45 > 28
Total FN 363 < 442
P-value 5.19332990918e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(20) and CentroidFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and CentroidFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and CentroidFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(20) and CentroidFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and CentroidFold).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 390
Total TN 113780
Total FP 169
Total FP CONTRA 11
Total FP INCONS 113
Total FP COMP 45
Total FN 363
Total Scores
MCC 0.625
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.633 ± 0.098
Sensitivity 0.518
Positive Predictive Value 0.759
Nr of predictions 21

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.92 0.90 0.95 18 971 1 0 1 0 2
3AMU_B 0.70 0.59 0.84 16 2984 5 0 3 2 11
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J20_0 0.66 0.57 0.77 17 2828 6 0 5 1 13
3J2L_3 0.74 0.58 0.94 31 7842 5 0 2 3 22
3J3D_C 0.82 0.71 0.95 20 2754 1 0 1 0 8
3J3E_7 0.65 0.54 0.78 29 7103 8 1 7 0 25
3J3E_8 0.17 0.15 0.21 5 7479 28 2 17 9 28
3J3F_8 0.38 0.36 0.39 13 12213 34 2 18 14 23
3J3F_7 0.79 0.68 0.92 34 7223 4 0 3 1 16
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.59 0.48 0.74 20 3889 7 1 6 0 22
3ZEX_C 0.39 0.27 0.56 14 14171 14 2 9 3 38
3ZEX_D 0.76 0.63 0.91 31 6987 3 0 3 0 18
3ZND_W 0.43 0.39 0.47 9 2984 12 1 9 2 14
4A1C_3 0.69 0.57 0.84 31 7103 6 0 6 0 23
4A1C_2 0.18 0.15 0.21 5 11757 28 0 19 9 28
4AOB_A 0.56 0.40 0.77 17 4349 6 1 4 1 25
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10
4FRG_B 0.81 0.66 1.00 21 3465 0 0 0 0 11

^top



Performance of CentroidFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 311
Total TN 113759
Total FP 252
Total FP CONTRA 22
Total FP INCONS 202
Total FP COMP 28
Total FN 442
Total Scores
MCC 0.487
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.511 ± 0.117
Sensitivity 0.413
Positive Predictive Value 0.581
Nr of predictions 21

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.92 0.90 0.95 18 971 1 0 1 0 2
3AMU_B 0.70 0.59 0.84 16 2984 5 0 3 2 11
3J20_1 0.91 0.87 0.95 20 2905 2 0 1 1 3
3J20_0 0.44 0.40 0.50 12 2826 13 0 12 1 18
3J2L_3 0.53 0.49 0.58 26 7830 21 0 19 2 27
3J3D_C 0.49 0.43 0.57 12 2754 9 0 9 0 16
3J3E_7 0.46 0.37 0.59 20 7106 14 1 13 0 34
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7485 21 2 16 3 33
3J3F_8 0.34 0.33 0.34 12 12211 34 4 19 11 24
3J3F_7 0.20 0.18 0.23 9 7221 30 1 29 0 41
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.58 0.48 0.71 20 3888 8 1 7 0 22
3ZEX_C 0.47 0.27 0.82 14 14179 3 1 2 0 38
3ZEX_D 0.73 0.59 0.91 29 6989 3 0 3 0 20
3ZND_W 0.20 0.22 0.19 5 2977 23 1 20 2 18
4A1C_3 0.67 0.56 0.81 30 7103 7 1 6 0 24
4A1C_2 0.16 0.15 0.17 5 11752 29 5 19 5 28
4AOB_A 0.45 0.33 0.61 14 4348 10 1 8 1 28
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.73 0.58 0.92 11 1314 1 1 0 0 8
4FRG_B 0.24 0.22 0.28 7 3461 18 3 15 0 25

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.