CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods

Laboratory of Structural Bioinformatics @ Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan

Home

Methods

Datasets

Rankings

RNA 2D Atlas

Help

FAQ

Contact us

RSS feeds

Twitter

Overview

Metric	TurboFold(20)		CentroidHomfold‑LAST
MCC	0.681	>	0.645
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.690 ± 0.107	>	0.669 ± 0.127
Sensitivity	0.558	>	0.549
Positive Predictive Value	0.836	>	0.764
Total TP	266	>	262
Total TN	59853	>	59828
Total FP	68	<	93
Total FP CONTRA	3	<	11
Total FP INCONS	49	<	70
Total FP COMP	16	>	12
Total FN	211	<	215
P-value	1.39551335374e-08

^top

Performance plots

Comparison of performance of TurboFold(20) and CentroidHomfold-LAST. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).
Comparison of performance of TurboFold(20) and CentroidHomfold-LAST. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(20) and CentroidHomfold-LAST. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(20) and CentroidHomfold-LAST. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

^top

Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	266
Total TN	59853
Total FP	68
Total FP CONTRA	3
Total FP INCONS	49
Total FP COMP	16
Total FN	211

Total Scores
MCC	0.681
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.690 ± 0.107
Sensitivity	0.558
Positive Predictive Value	0.836
Nr of predictions	14

^top

2. Individual counts for TurboFold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2L94_A	HIV_FE links to Rfam database...	0.92	0.90	0.95	18	971	1	0	1	0	2
3AMU_B	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.70	0.59	0.84	16	2984	5	0	3	2	11
3J20_1	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.96	0.91	1.00	21	2905	0	0	0	0	2
3J20_0	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.66	0.57	0.77	17	2828	6	0	5	1	13
3J2L_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.74	0.58	0.94	31	7842	5	0	2	3	22
3RKF_A	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.76	0.59	1.00	20	2191	0	0	0	0	14
3SD1_A	THF links to Rfam database...	0.59	0.48	0.74	20	3889	7	1	6	0	22
3ZEX_D	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.76	0.63	0.91	31	6987	3	0	3	0	18
4A1C_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.69	0.57	0.84	31	7103	6	0	6	0	23
4A1C_2	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.18	0.15	0.21	5	11757	28	0	19	9	28
4AOB_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.56	0.40	0.77	17	4349	6	1	4	1	25
4ENB_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.69	0.47	1.00	9	1266	0	0	0	0	10
4ENC_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.65	0.47	0.90	9	1316	1	1	0	0	10
4FRG_B	AdoCbl-variant links to Rfam database...	0.81	0.66	1.00	21	3465	0	0	0	0	11

^top

Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	262
Total TN	59828
Total FP	93
Total FP CONTRA	11
Total FP INCONS	70
Total FP COMP	12
Total FN	215

Total Scores
MCC	0.645
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.669 ± 0.127
Sensitivity	0.549
Positive Predictive Value	0.764
Nr of predictions	14

^top

2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2L94_A	HIV_FE links to Rfam database...	0.92	0.90	0.95	18	971	1	0	1	0	2
3AMU_B	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.82	0.70	0.95	19	2983	3	0	1	2	8
3J20_1	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.96	0.91	1.00	21	2905	0	0	0	0	2
3J20_0	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.35	0.37	0.34	11	2818	22	3	18	1	19
3J2L_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.73	0.62	0.87	33	7837	7	0	5	2	20
3RKF_A	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.72	0.53	1.00	18	2193	0	0	0	0	16
3SD1_A	THF links to Rfam database...	0.64	0.45	0.90	19	3895	2	0	2	0	23
3ZEX_D	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.75	0.65	0.86	32	6984	5	0	5	0	17
4A1C_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.68	0.56	0.83	30	7104	6	0	6	0	24
4A1C_2	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.16	0.15	0.18	5	11753	29	5	18	6	28
4AOB_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.71	0.50	1.00	21	4350	1	0	0	1	21
4ENB_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.76	0.58	1.00	11	1264	0	0	0	0	8
4ENC_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.76	0.58	1.00	11	1315	0	0	0	0	8
4FRG_B	AdoCbl-variant links to Rfam database...	0.41	0.41	0.43	13	3456	17	3	14	0	19

^top

Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.

Table of contents:

Overview

Performance plots

Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(20)

2. Individual counts for TurboFold(20) [ download as .csv ]

Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]