CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods

Laboratory of Structural Bioinformatics @ Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan

Home

Methods

Datasets

Rankings

RNA 2D Atlas

Help

FAQ

Contact us

RSS feeds

Twitter

Overview

Metric	TurboFold(20)		RNASampler(20)
MCC	0.655	>	0.623
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.670 ± 0.108	>	0.650 ± 0.121
Sensitivity	0.529	>	0.476
Positive Predictive Value	0.816	<	0.821
Total TP	280	>	252
Total TN	74024	<	74060
Total FP	82	>	78
Total FP CONTRA	5	>	2
Total FP INCONS	58	>	53
Total FP COMP	19	<	23
Total FN	249	<	277
P-value	1.75835195567e-08

^top

Performance plots

Comparison of performance of TurboFold(20) and RNASampler(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and RNASampler(20)).
Comparison of performance of TurboFold(20) and RNASampler(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and RNASampler(20)).
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and RNASampler(20)).
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and RNASampler(20)).
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(20) and RNASampler(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and RNASampler(20)).
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(20) and RNASampler(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and RNASampler(20)).

^top

Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	280
Total TN	74024
Total FP	82
Total FP CONTRA	5
Total FP INCONS	58
Total FP COMP	19
Total FN	249

Total Scores
MCC	0.655
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.670 ± 0.108
Sensitivity	0.529
Positive Predictive Value	0.816
Nr of predictions	15

^top

2. Individual counts for TurboFold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2L94_A	HIV_FE links to Rfam database...	0.92	0.90	0.95	18	971	1	0	1	0	2
3AMU_B	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.70	0.59	0.84	16	2984	5	0	3	2	11
3J20_1	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.96	0.91	1.00	21	2905	0	0	0	0	2
3J20_0	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.66	0.57	0.77	17	2828	6	0	5	1	13
3J2L_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.74	0.58	0.94	31	7842	5	0	2	3	22
3RKF_A	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.76	0.59	1.00	20	2191	0	0	0	0	14
3SD1_A	THF links to Rfam database...	0.59	0.48	0.74	20	3889	7	1	6	0	22
3ZEX_C	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.39	0.27	0.56	14	14171	14	2	9	3	38
3ZEX_D	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.76	0.63	0.91	31	6987	3	0	3	0	18
4A1C_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.69	0.57	0.84	31	7103	6	0	6	0	23
4A1C_2	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.18	0.15	0.21	5	11757	28	0	19	9	28
4AOB_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.56	0.40	0.77	17	4349	6	1	4	1	25
4ENB_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.69	0.47	1.00	9	1266	0	0	0	0	10
4ENC_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.65	0.47	0.90	9	1316	1	1	0	0	10
4FRG_B	AdoCbl-variant links to Rfam database...	0.81	0.66	1.00	21	3465	0	0	0	0	11

^top

Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	252
Total TN	74060
Total FP	78
Total FP CONTRA	2
Total FP INCONS	53
Total FP COMP	23
Total FN	277

Total Scores
MCC	0.623
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.650 ± 0.121
Sensitivity	0.476
Positive Predictive Value	0.821
Nr of predictions	15

^top

2. Individual counts for RNASampler(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2L94_A	HIV_FE links to Rfam database...	0.92	0.90	0.95	18	971	1	0	1	0	2
3AMU_B	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.82	0.70	0.95	19	2983	3	0	1	2	8
3J20_1	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.96	0.91	1.00	21	2905	0	0	0	0	2
3J20_0	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.80	0.67	0.95	20	2829	2	0	1	1	10
3J2L_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.45	0.32	0.63	17	7848	12	1	9	2	36
3RKF_A	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.76	0.59	1.00	20	2191	0	0	0	0	14
3SD1_A	THF links to Rfam database...	0.67	0.48	0.95	20	3895	1	0	1	0	22
3ZEX_C	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.27	0.19	0.38	10	14170	20	1	15	4	42
3ZEX_D	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.68	0.49	0.96	24	6996	1	0	1	0	25
4A1C_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.74	0.56	1.00	30	7110	0	0	0	0	24
4A1C_2	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.18	0.15	0.23	5	11759	30	0	17	13	28
4AOB_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.58	0.40	0.85	17	4351	4	0	3	1	25
4ENB_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.60	0.37	1.00	7	1268	0	0	0	0	12
4ENC_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.76	0.58	1.00	11	1315	0	0	0	0	8
4FRG_B	AdoCbl-variant links to Rfam database...	0.55	0.41	0.76	13	3469	4	0	4	0	19

^top

Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.

Table of contents:

Overview

Performance plots

Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(20)

2. Individual counts for TurboFold(20) [ download as .csv ]

Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(20)

2. Individual counts for RNASampler(20) [ download as .csv ]