CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Multilign(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(seed) & Multilign(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(seed) Multilign(20)
MCC 0.595 > 0.568
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.626 ± 0.187 > 0.580 ± 0.215
Sensitivity 0.490 > 0.483
Positive Predictive Value 0.729 > 0.676
Total TP 129 > 127
Total TN 32833 > 32822
Total FP 58 < 66
Total FP CONTRA 6 < 7
Total FP INCONS 42 < 54
Total FP COMP 10 > 5
Total FN 134 < 136
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and Multilign(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and Multilign(20)).

  2. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and Multilign(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and Multilign(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and Multilign(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and Multilign(20)).

  4. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and Multilign(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and Multilign(20)).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 129
Total TN 32833
Total FP 58
Total FP CONTRA 6
Total FP INCONS 42
Total FP COMP 10
Total FN 134
Total Scores
MCC 0.595
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.626 ± 0.187
Sensitivity 0.490
Positive Predictive Value 0.729
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.92 0.90 0.95 18 971 1 0 1 0 2
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.59 0.48 0.74 20 3889 7 1 6 0 22
4A1C_2 0.15 0.15 0.15 5 11748 37 3 25 9 28
4A1C_3 0.69 0.57 0.84 31 7103 6 0 6 0 23
4AOB_A 0.56 0.40 0.77 17 4349 6 1 4 1 25
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10

^top



Performance of Multilign(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 127
Total TN 32822
Total FP 66
Total FP CONTRA 7
Total FP INCONS 54
Total FP COMP 5
Total FN 136
Total Scores
MCC 0.568
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.580 ± 0.215
Sensitivity 0.483
Positive Predictive Value 0.676
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 971 0 0 0 0 1
3RKF_A 0.77 0.62 0.95 21 2189 1 0 1 0 13
3SD1_A 0.57 0.48 0.69 20 3887 9 1 8 0 22
4A1C_2 0.15 0.15 0.15 5 11747 33 3 26 4 28
4A1C_3 0.70 0.59 0.84 32 7102 6 0 6 0 22
4AOB_A 0.49 0.38 0.64 16 4346 10 1 8 1 26
4ENB_A 0.34 0.26 0.45 5 1264 6 1 5 0 14
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.