CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(seed) & RDfolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(seed) RDfolder
MCC 0.598 > 0.467
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.594 ± 0.271 > 0.462 ± 0.297
Sensitivity 0.474 > 0.352
Positive Predictive Value 0.762 > 0.633
Total TP 93 > 69
Total TN 15507 < 15520
Total FP 30 < 41
Total FP CONTRA 5 > 3
Total FP INCONS 24 < 37
Total FP COMP 1 = 1
Total FN 103 < 127
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and RDfolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and RDfolder).

  2. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and RDfolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and RDfolder).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and RDfolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and RDfolder).

  4. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and RDfolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and RDfolder).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 93
Total TN 15507
Total FP 30
Total FP CONTRA 5
Total FP INCONS 24
Total FP COMP 1
Total FN 103
Total Scores
MCC 0.598
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.594 ± 0.271
Sensitivity 0.474
Positive Predictive Value 0.762
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.92 0.90 0.95 18 971 1 0 1 0 2
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.59 0.48 0.74 20 3889 7 1 6 0 22
4AOB_A 0.56 0.40 0.77 17 4349 6 1 4 1 25
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10

^top



Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RDfolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 69
Total TN 15520
Total FP 41
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 37
Total FP COMP 1
Total FN 127
Total Scores
MCC 0.467
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.462 ± 0.297
Sensitivity 0.352
Positive Predictive Value 0.633
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for RDfolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 971 0 0 0 0 1
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1526 14 2 12 0 20
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.30 0.17 0.54 7 3903 6 0 6 0 35
4AOB_A 0.35 0.26 0.48 11 4348 13 1 11 1 31
4ENB_A 0.43 0.32 0.60 6 1265 4 0 4 0 13
4ENC_A 0.43 0.32 0.60 6 1316 4 0 4 0 13

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.