CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods

FAQ

Metric	TurboFold(seed)		RNASLOpt
MCC	0.478	>	0.395
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.475 ± 0.229	>	0.438 ± 0.190
Sensitivity	0.382	>	0.320
Positive Predictive Value	0.603	>	0.494
Total TP	105	>	88
Total TN	46606	>	46602
Total FP	82	<	109
Total FP CONTRA	10	<	15
Total FP INCONS	59	<	75
Total FP COMP	13	<	19
Total FN	170	<	187
P-value	0.0

Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and RNASLOpt. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and RNASLOpt).
Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and RNASLOpt. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and RNASLOpt).
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and RNASLOpt. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and RNASLOpt).
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and RNASLOpt. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and RNASLOpt).

Total Scores
MCC	0.478
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.475 ± 0.229
Sensitivity	0.382
Positive Predictive Value	0.603
Nr of predictions	8

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2LC8_A	GP_knot1 links to Rfam database...	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	1525	15	2	13	0	20
3ZEX_C	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.39	0.27	0.56	14	14171	14	2	9	3	38
4A1C_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.69	0.57	0.84	31	7103	6	0	6	0	23
4A1C_2	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.15	0.15	0.15	5	11748	37	3	25	9	28
4AOB_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.56	0.40	0.77	17	4349	6	1	4	1	25
4ENB_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.69	0.47	1.00	9	1266	0	0	0	0	10
4ENC_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.65	0.47	0.90	9	1316	1	1	0	0	10
4FRN_A	AdoCbl-variant links to Rfam database...	0.69	0.56	0.87	20	5128	3	1	2	0	16

Total Scores
MCC	0.395
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.438 ± 0.190
Sensitivity	0.320
Positive Predictive Value	0.494
Nr of predictions	8

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2LC8_A	GP_knot1 links to Rfam database...	0.47	0.35	0.64	7	1529	4	0	4	0	13
3ZEX_C	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.26	0.21	0.33	11	14163	35	2	20	13	41
4A1C_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.67	0.52	0.88	28	7108	4	0	4	0	26
4A1C_2	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.23	0.24	0.22	8	11744	35	8	21	6	25
4AOB_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.26	0.19	0.38	8	4350	13	2	11	0	34
4ENB_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.76	0.58	1.00	11	1264	0	0	0	0	8
4ENC_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.65	0.47	0.90	9	1316	1	1	0	0	10
4FRN_A	AdoCbl-variant links to Rfam database...	0.20	0.17	0.26	6	5128	17	2	15	0	30

Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.