CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RSpredict(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(seed) & RSpredict(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(seed) RSpredict(20)
MCC 0.510 > 0.404
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.542 ± 0.163 > 0.411 ± 0.149
Sensitivity 0.419 > 0.313
Positive Predictive Value 0.626 > 0.529
Total TP 161 > 120
Total TN 66698 < 66728
Total FP 132 > 122
Total FP CONTRA 12 < 15
Total FP INCONS 84 < 92
Total FP COMP 36 > 15
Total FN 223 < 264
P-value 1.31583660336e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and RSpredict(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and RSpredict(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and RSpredict(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and RSpredict(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and RSpredict(20)).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 161
Total TN 66698
Total FP 132
Total FP CONTRA 12
Total FP INCONS 84
Total FP COMP 36
Total FN 223
Total Scores
MCC 0.510
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.542 ± 0.163
Sensitivity 0.419
Positive Predictive Value 0.626
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.92 0.90 0.95 18 971 1 0 1 0 2
3J3E_8 0.17 0.15 0.21 5 7479 28 2 17 9 28
3J3F_8 0.39 0.36 0.42 13 12215 32 2 16 14 23
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.59 0.48 0.74 20 3889 7 1 6 0 22
3ZEX_C 0.39 0.27 0.56 14 14171 14 2 9 3 38
4A1C_3 0.69 0.57 0.84 31 7103 6 0 6 0 23
4A1C_2 0.15 0.15 0.15 5 11748 37 3 25 9 28
4AOB_A 0.56 0.40 0.77 17 4349 6 1 4 1 25
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10

^top



Performance of RSpredict(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RSpredict(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 120
Total TN 66728
Total FP 122
Total FP CONTRA 15
Total FP INCONS 92
Total FP COMP 15
Total FN 264
Total Scores
MCC 0.404
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.411 ± 0.149
Sensitivity 0.313
Positive Predictive Value 0.529
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for RSpredict(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.55 0.50 0.63 10 974 6 0 6 0 10
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7484 19 4 15 0 33
3J3F_8 0.39 0.33 0.46 12 12220 23 2 12 9 24
3RKF_A 0.77 0.62 0.95 21 2189 1 0 1 0 13
3SD1_A 0.68 0.60 0.78 25 3884 7 1 6 0 17
3ZEX_C 0.26 0.19 0.36 10 14168 18 2 16 0 42
4A1C_3 0.48 0.33 0.69 18 7114 8 0 8 0 36
4A1C_2 0.19 0.18 0.20 6 11751 30 6 18 6 27
4AOB_A 0.28 0.14 0.55 6 4360 5 0 5 0 36
4ENB_A 0.48 0.32 0.75 6 1267 2 0 2 0 13
4ENC_A 0.45 0.32 0.67 6 1317 3 0 3 0 13

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.