CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Vsfold4 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(seed) & Vsfold4 [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(seed) Vsfold4
MCC 0.550 > 0.423
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.555 ± 0.229 > 0.475 ± 0.244
Sensitivity 0.456 > 0.346
Positive Predictive Value 0.672 > 0.527
Total TP 129 > 98
Total TN 34358 < 34364
Total FP 73 < 101
Total FP CONTRA 8 > 4
Total FP INCONS 55 < 84
Total FP COMP 10 < 13
Total FN 154 < 185
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and Vsfold4. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and Vsfold4).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and Vsfold4. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and Vsfold4).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 129
Total TN 34358
Total FP 73
Total FP CONTRA 8
Total FP INCONS 55
Total FP COMP 10
Total FN 154
Total Scores
MCC 0.550
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.555 ± 0.229
Sensitivity 0.456
Positive Predictive Value 0.672
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.92 0.90 0.95 18 971 1 0 1 0 2
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.59 0.48 0.74 20 3889 7 1 6 0 22
4A1C_2 0.15 0.15 0.15 5 11748 37 3 25 9 28
4A1C_3 0.69 0.57 0.84 31 7103 6 0 6 0 23
4AOB_A 0.56 0.40 0.77 17 4349 6 1 4 1 25
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10

^top



Performance of Vsfold4 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Vsfold4

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 98
Total TN 34364
Total FP 101
Total FP CONTRA 4
Total FP INCONS 84
Total FP COMP 13
Total FN 185
Total Scores
MCC 0.423
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.475 ± 0.244
Sensitivity 0.346
Positive Predictive Value 0.527
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for Vsfold4 [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.92 0.85 1.00 17 973 0 0 0 0 3
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1527 13 0 13 0 20
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.19 0.17 0.24 7 3887 22 1 21 0 35
4A1C_2 0.28 0.24 0.33 8 11757 28 0 16 12 25
4A1C_3 0.26 0.22 0.32 12 7103 25 2 23 0 42
4AOB_A 0.42 0.33 0.54 14 4345 13 1 11 1 28
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1317 0 0 0 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.