CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods

Laboratory of Structural Bioinformatics @ Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan

Home

Methods

Datasets

Rankings

RNA 2D Atlas

Help

FAQ

Contact us

RSS feeds

Twitter

Overview

Metric	UNAFold		NanoFolder
MCC	0.556	>	0.339
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.633 ± 0.132	>	0.536 ± 0.139
Sensitivity	0.489	>	0.350
Positive Predictive Value	0.639	>	0.338
Total TP	361	>	258
Total TN	106284	>	106086
Total FP	229	<	523
Total FP CONTRA	19	<	60
Total FP INCONS	185	<	445
Total FP COMP	25	>	18
Total FN	377	<	480
P-value	5.19332990918e-08

^top

Performance plots

Comparison of performance of UNAFold and NanoFolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for UNAFold and NanoFolder).
Comparison of performance of UNAFold and NanoFolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for UNAFold and NanoFolder).
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for UNAFold and NanoFolder).
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for UNAFold and NanoFolder).
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for UNAFold and NanoFolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for UNAFold and NanoFolder).
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for UNAFold and NanoFolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for UNAFold and NanoFolder).

^top

Performance of UNAFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for UNAFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	361
Total TN	106284
Total FP	229
Total FP CONTRA	19
Total FP INCONS	185
Total FP COMP	25
Total FN	377

Total Scores
MCC	0.556
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.633 ± 0.132
Sensitivity	0.489
Positive Predictive Value	0.639
Nr of predictions	25

^top

2. Individual counts for UNAFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2LC8_A	GP_knot1 links to Rfam database...	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	1525	15	2	13	0	20
2LDL_A	-	0.90	0.82	1.00	9	342	1	0	0	1	2
2LI4_A	-	0.93	0.88	1.00	14	482	0	0	0	0	2
2LK3_A	-	0.95	0.90	1.00	9	267	0	0	0	0	1
2LKR_A	-	0.93	0.87	1.00	34	6071	1	0	0	1	5
2LQZ_A	-	0.85	0.82	0.90	9	341	1	1	0	0	2
2LWK_A	-	0.83	0.77	0.91	10	485	1	0	1	0	3
3J16_L	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.26	0.23	0.30	7	2752	16	1	15	0	23
3J20_1	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.73	0.70	0.76	16	2905	5	0	5	0	7
3J2L_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.62	0.53	0.74	28	7837	12	0	10	2	25
3SN2_B	IRE_II links to Rfam database...	0.96	0.92	1.00	11	395	0	0	0	0	1
3U4M_B	-	0.38	0.32	0.46	12	3134	14	0	14	0	25
3UZL_B	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.48	0.38	0.61	14	3547	9	0	9	0	23
3VJR_D	-	0.96	0.92	1.00	12	618	0	0	0	0	1
3W3S_B	tRNA-Sec links to Rfam database...	0.56	0.50	0.63	20	4721	13	1	11	1	20
3ZEX_G	-	0.75	0.64	0.89	47	16418	12	0	6	6	27
3ZEX_D	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.77	0.65	0.91	32	6986	3	0	3	0	17
3ZEX_E	-	0.00	0.00	0.00	0	21893	54	4	48	2	77
4A1C_2	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.14	0.15	0.14	5	11745	42	5	26	11	28
4A1C_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.70	0.59	0.82	32	7101	7	1	6	0	22
4A4U_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	222	0	0	0	0	0
4AOB_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.50	0.40	0.63	17	4344	11	2	8	1	25
4ATO_G	-	0.32	0.30	0.38	3	520	5	1	4	0	7
4ENC_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.32	0.26	0.42	5	1314	7	1	6	0	14
4HXH_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	6	319	0	0	0	0	0

^top

Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for NanoFolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	258
Total TN	106086
Total FP	523
Total FP CONTRA	60
Total FP INCONS	445
Total FP COMP	18
Total FN	480

Total Scores
MCC	0.339
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.536 ± 0.139
Sensitivity	0.350
Positive Predictive Value	0.338
Nr of predictions	25

^top

2. Individual counts for NanoFolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2LC8_A	GP_knot1 links to Rfam database...	0.52	0.55	0.50	11	1518	11	0	11	0	9
2LDL_A	-	0.90	0.82	1.00	9	342	1	0	0	1	2
2LI4_A	-	0.93	0.88	1.00	14	482	0	0	0	0	2
2LK3_A	-	0.95	0.90	1.00	9	267	0	0	0	0	1
2LKR_A	-	0.29	0.33	0.25	13	6054	38	8	30	0	26
2LQZ_A	-	0.91	0.91	0.91	10	340	1	1	0	0	1
2LWK_A	-	0.83	0.77	0.91	10	485	2	0	1	1	3
3J16_L	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.36	0.37	0.37	11	2745	19	3	16	0	19
3J20_1	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.41	0.48	0.37	11	2896	19	5	14	0	12
3J2L_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.11	0.11	0.12	6	7824	46	3	42	1	47
3SN2_B	IRE_II links to Rfam database...	0.96	0.92	1.00	11	395	0	0	0	0	1
3U4M_B	-	0.61	0.57	0.66	21	3128	11	1	10	0	16
3UZL_B	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.36	0.35	0.38	13	3536	21	3	18	0	24
3VJR_D	-	0.96	0.92	1.00	12	618	0	0	0	0	1
3W3S_B	tRNA-Sec links to Rfam database...	0.17	0.18	0.18	7	4713	34	1	32	1	33
3ZEX_G	-	0.05	0.05	0.05	4	16393	76	5	69	2	70
3ZEX_D	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.26	0.27	0.27	13	6972	36	1	35	0	36
3ZEX_E	-	0.03	0.04	0.03	3	21859	85	9	74	2	74
4A1C_2	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.00	0.00	0.00	0	11728	61	12	41	8	33
4A1C_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.48	0.46	0.51	25	7091	24	2	22	0	29
4A4U_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	222	0	0	0	0	0
4AOB_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.33	0.29	0.39	12	4340	20	1	18	1	30
4ATO_G	-	0.61	0.70	0.54	7	515	6	2	4	0	3
4ENC_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.57	0.58	0.58	11	1307	9	0	8	1	8
4HXH_A	-	0.81	1.00	0.67	6	316	3	3	0	0	0

^top

Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.

Table of contents:

Overview

Performance plots

Performance of UNAFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for UNAFold

2. Individual counts for UNAFold [ download as .csv ]

Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for NanoFolder

2. Individual counts for NanoFolder [ download as .csv ]