CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of UNAFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for UNAFold & RNASampler(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric UNAFold RNASampler(seed)
MCC 0.639 > 0.635
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.698 ± 0.159 > 0.663 ± 0.127
Sensitivity 0.584 > 0.484
Positive Predictive Value 0.704 < 0.837
Total TP 316 > 262
Total TN 79859 < 79995
Total FP 184 > 73
Total FP CONTRA 14 > 5
Total FP INCONS 119 > 46
Total FP COMP 51 > 22
Total FN 225 < 279
P-value 3.7981009876e-07

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of UNAFold and RNASampler(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for UNAFold and RNASampler(seed)).

  2. Comparison of performance of UNAFold and RNASampler(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for UNAFold and RNASampler(seed)).

  3. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for UNAFold and RNASampler(seed)).

  4. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for UNAFold and RNASampler(seed)).

  5. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for UNAFold and RNASampler(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for UNAFold and RNASampler(seed)).

  6. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for UNAFold and RNASampler(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for UNAFold and RNASampler(seed)).

^top





Performance of UNAFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for UNAFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 316
Total TN 79859
Total FP 184
Total FP CONTRA 14
Total FP INCONS 119
Total FP COMP 51
Total FN 225
Total Scores
MCC 0.639
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.698 ± 0.159
Sensitivity 0.584
Positive Predictive Value 0.704
Nr of predictions 19

^top



2. Individual counts for UNAFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2KE6_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 18 1110 1 0 0 1 1
2KUR_A 0.95 0.90 1.00 19 1109 0 0 0 0 2
2KUU_A 0.92 0.86 1.00 18 1110 1 0 0 1 3
2KUV_A 0.93 0.86 1.00 19 1109 0 0 0 0 3
2KUW_A 0.95 0.90 1.00 19 1109 0 0 0 0 2
2L1F_A 0.98 0.96 1.00 23 2057 0 0 0 0 1
2L1F_B 0.98 0.96 1.00 24 2121 0 0 0 0 1
2L94_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 971 0 0 0 0 1
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
3A3A_A 0.87 0.76 1.00 28 3627 0 0 0 0 9
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3JYX_4 0.32 0.30 0.34 10 12217 31 3 16 12 23
3O58_3 0.35 0.34 0.35 12 12369 33 1 21 11 23
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.64 0.52 0.79 22 3888 6 1 5 0 20
3W3S_B 0.56 0.50 0.63 20 4721 13 1 11 1 20
3ZEX_C 0.24 0.21 0.28 11 14157 42 1 27 14 41
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11745 42 5 26 11 28

^top



Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 262
Total TN 79995
Total FP 73
Total FP CONTRA 5
Total FP INCONS 46
Total FP COMP 22
Total FN 279
Total Scores
MCC 0.635
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.663 ± 0.127
Sensitivity 0.484
Positive Predictive Value 0.837
Nr of predictions 19

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2KE6_A 0.92 0.84 1.00 16 1112 1 0 0 1 3
2KUR_A 0.90 0.81 1.00 17 1111 0 0 0 0 4
2KUU_A 0.87 0.76 1.00 16 1112 1 0 0 1 5
2KUV_A 0.88 0.77 1.00 17 1111 0 0 0 0 5
2KUW_A 0.90 0.81 1.00 17 1111 0 0 0 0 4
2L1F_A 0.81 0.67 1.00 16 2064 0 0 0 0 8
2L1F_B 0.82 0.68 1.00 17 2128 0 0 0 0 8
2L94_A 0.71 0.55 0.92 11 978 1 0 1 0 9
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1530 10 0 10 0 20
3A3A_A 0.70 0.49 1.00 18 3637 0 0 0 0 19
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3JYX_4 0.39 0.30 0.50 10 12226 13 2 8 3 23
3O58_3 0.45 0.34 0.60 12 12383 12 2 6 4 23
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.60 0.38 0.94 16 3899 1 0 1 0 26
3W3S_B 0.55 0.30 1.00 12 4741 1 0 0 1 28
3ZEX_C 0.32 0.19 0.53 10 14177 13 1 8 4 42
4A1C_2 0.31 0.24 0.40 8 11761 20 0 12 8 25

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.