CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Vsfold4 - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Vsfold4 & RNAwolf [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Vsfold4 RNAwolf
MCC 0.466 > 0.439
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.558 ± 0.081 > 0.534 ± 0.086
Sensitivity 0.388 < 0.411
Positive Predictive Value 0.568 > 0.478
Total TP 620 < 656
Total TN 209529 > 209249
Total FP 520 < 788
Total FP CONTRA 37 < 83
Total FP INCONS 434 < 632
Total FP COMP 49 < 73
Total FN 978 > 942
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Vsfold4 and RNAwolf. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Vsfold4 and RNAwolf).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Vsfold4 and RNAwolf).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Vsfold4 and RNAwolf. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Vsfold4 and RNAwolf).

^top





Performance of Vsfold4 - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Vsfold4

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 620
Total TN 209529
Total FP 520
Total FP CONTRA 37
Total FP INCONS 434
Total FP COMP 49
Total FN 978
Total Scores
MCC 0.466
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.558 ± 0.081
Sensitivity 0.388
Positive Predictive Value 0.568
Nr of predictions 60

^top



2. Individual counts for Vsfold4 [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1527 13 0 13 0 20
2LDL_A - 0.85 0.73 1.00 8 343 1 0 0 1 3
2LDT_A - 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 454 0 0 0 0 4
2LHP_A - 0.97 0.94 1.00 15 651 0 0 0 0 1
2LI4_A - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 2
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 343 2 0 0 2 0
2LK3_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 267 0 0 0 0 1
2LKR_A - 0.31 0.28 0.34 11 6073 21 3 18 0 28
2LQZ_A - 0.85 0.82 0.90 9 341 1 1 0 0 2
2LU0_A - 0.69 0.63 0.77 10 1163 3 0 3 0 6
2LWK_A - 0.83 0.77 0.91 10 485 1 0 1 0 3
2M58_A - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1647 6 0 6 0 17
2YIE_X - 0.36 0.33 0.40 4 1368 6 2 4 0 8
2YIE_Z - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1529 11 3 8 0 12
3AMU_B 0.64 0.56 0.75 15 2983 7 0 5 2 12
3J0L_h - 0.38 0.28 0.52 12 6082 11 0 11 0 31
3J0L_7 - 0.51 0.41 0.64 7 1214 4 0 4 0 10
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 461 4 1 3 0 4
3J0L_8 - 0.70 0.50 1.00 4 186 0 0 0 0 4
3J0L_1 - 0.28 0.21 0.40 4 1215 6 1 5 0 15
3J0L_a - 0.39 0.31 0.50 5 1118 5 2 3 0 11
3J0L_2 - 0.38 0.36 0.41 12 6187 18 3 14 1 21
3J16_L 0.82 0.67 1.00 20 2755 0 0 0 0 10
3J20_1 0.71 0.70 0.73 16 2904 6 0 6 0 7
3J20_0 0.84 0.70 1.00 21 2829 1 0 0 1 9
3J2C_O - 0.30 0.24 0.39 15 10258 24 0 23 1 48
3J2L_3 0.57 0.45 0.73 24 7842 12 1 8 3 29
3J3D_C 0.44 0.39 0.50 11 2753 11 1 10 0 17
3J3E_8 0.07 0.06 0.09 2 7481 32 2 18 12 31
3J3E_7 0.48 0.35 0.66 19 7111 10 0 10 0 35
3J3F_7 0.21 0.18 0.26 9 7226 25 0 25 0 41
3J3F_8 0.33 0.31 0.37 11 12216 27 4 15 8 25
3J3V_B 0.17 0.12 0.24 7 6992 22 1 21 0 50
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.19 0.17 0.24 7 3887 22 1 21 0 35
3SIU_F - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 372 0 0 0 0 5
3SN2_B 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 395 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 205 1 0 0 1 1
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 247 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 271 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.38 0.32 0.46 12 3134 14 0 14 0 25
3UZL_B 0.53 0.41 0.71 15 3549 6 1 5 0 22
3VJR_D - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 618 0 0 0 0 1
3W3S_B 0.67 0.58 0.79 23 4724 7 0 6 1 17
3ZEX_G - 0.30 0.23 0.39 17 16427 27 2 25 0 57
3ZEX_D 0.55 0.45 0.69 22 6989 10 0 10 0 27
3ZEX_E - 0.08 0.06 0.11 5 21900 40 1 39 0 72
3ZND_W 0.41 0.39 0.43 9 2982 14 2 10 2 14
4A1C_2 0.28 0.24 0.33 8 11757 28 0 16 12 25
4A1C_3 0.26 0.22 0.32 12 7103 25 2 23 0 42
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.42 0.33 0.54 14 4345 13 1 11 1 28
4ATO_G - 0.32 0.30 0.38 3 520 5 1 4 0 7
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1317 0 0 0 0 10
4FRG_B 0.56 0.47 0.68 15 3464 7 1 6 0 17
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 319 0 0 0 0 0
4JF2_A 0.66 0.52 0.84 16 2831 3 0 3 0 15
4JRC_A - 0.29 0.22 0.42 5 1528 7 0 7 0 18

^top



Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAwolf

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 656
Total TN 209249
Total FP 788
Total FP CONTRA 83
Total FP INCONS 632
Total FP COMP 73
Total FN 942
Total Scores
MCC 0.439
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.534 ± 0.086
Sensitivity 0.411
Positive Predictive Value 0.478
Nr of predictions 60

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAwolf [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A 0.52 0.50 0.56 10 1522 8 0 8 0 10
2LDL_A - 0.74 0.64 0.88 7 343 1 0 1 0 4
2LDT_A - 0.86 0.80 0.92 12 452 1 0 1 0 3
2LHP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 650 1 0 0 1 0
2LI4_A - 0.97 0.94 1.00 15 481 0 0 0 0 1
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 343 3 0 0 3 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 266 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 0.81 0.74 0.88 29 6072 8 0 4 4 10
2LQZ_A - 0.91 0.91 0.91 10 340 1 1 0 0 1
2LU0_A - 0.97 0.94 1.00 15 1161 3 0 0 3 1
2LWK_A - 0.37 0.38 0.38 5 483 9 0 8 1 8
2M58_A - 0.51 0.47 0.57 8 1639 6 3 3 0 9
2YIE_X - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1364 15 4 10 1 12
2YIE_Z - 0.43 0.42 0.45 5 1529 9 1 5 3 7
3AMU_B 0.68 0.63 0.74 17 2980 9 0 6 3 10
3J0L_h - 0.33 0.30 0.37 13 6070 24 0 22 2 30
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1214 11 0 11 0 17
3J0L_g - 0.16 0.25 0.11 1 456 8 6 2 0 3
3J0L_8 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 7 183 0 0 0 0 1
3J0L_1 - 0.68 0.63 0.75 12 1209 5 0 4 1 7
3J0L_a - 0.18 0.19 0.20 3 1113 12 1 11 0 13
3J0L_2 - 0.11 0.12 0.11 4 6181 34 5 26 3 29
3J16_L 0.45 0.40 0.52 12 2752 11 0 11 0 18
3J20_1 0.46 0.52 0.41 12 2897 17 6 11 0 11
3J20_0 0.40 0.40 0.41 12 2821 18 0 17 1 18
3J2C_O - 0.40 0.37 0.44 23 10244 30 0 29 1 40
3J2L_3 0.55 0.49 0.62 26 7833 18 0 16 2 27
3J3D_C 0.79 0.75 0.84 21 2750 5 2 2 1 7
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7470 42 4 29 9 33
3J3E_7 0.41 0.35 0.49 19 7101 20 1 19 0 35
3J3F_7 0.21 0.20 0.23 10 7216 34 2 32 0 40
3J3F_8 0.23 0.25 0.21 9 12204 45 5 28 12 27
3J3V_B 0.43 0.37 0.51 21 6980 20 2 18 0 36
3RKF_A 0.72 0.62 0.84 21 2186 4 0 4 0 13
3SD1_A 0.46 0.43 0.50 18 3880 18 0 18 0 24
3SIU_F - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 372 0 0 0 0 5
3SN2_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 394 0 0 0 0 0
3TRZ_Z - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 205 0 0 0 0 1
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 247 2 0 0 2 0
3TS2_V - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 270 7 0 6 1 5
3U4M_B - 0.44 0.38 0.52 14 3133 13 0 13 0 23
3UZL_B 0.72 0.59 0.88 22 3545 4 1 2 1 15
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 13 617 1 0 0 1 0
3W3S_B 0.68 0.63 0.74 25 4719 10 0 9 1 15
3ZEX_G - 0.20 0.18 0.23 13 16415 43 6 37 0 61
3ZEX_D 0.20 0.18 0.22 9 6980 32 3 29 0 40
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21876 69 10 59 0 77
3ZND_W 0.50 0.48 0.52 11 2982 13 0 10 3 12
4A1C_2 0.08 0.09 0.08 3 11741 46 10 27 9 30
4A1C_3 0.23 0.20 0.28 11 7101 28 2 26 0 43
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.23 0.19 0.30 8 4344 20 1 18 1 34
4ATO_G - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 520 8 1 7 0 10
4ENB_A 0.35 0.32 0.40 6 1260 9 1 8 0 13
4ENC_A 0.34 0.32 0.38 6 1310 10 1 9 0 13
4FRG_B 0.56 0.50 0.64 16 3461 10 1 8 1 16
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 319 2 0 0 2 0
4JF2_A 0.67 0.58 0.78 18 2827 5 3 2 0 13
4JRC_A - 0.58 0.52 0.67 12 1522 6 0 6 0 11

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.