CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Alterna - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Afold & Alterna [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Afold Alterna
MCC 0.685 > 0.682
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.610 ± 0.216 < 0.690 ± 0.155
Sensitivity 0.678 > 0.668
Positive Predictive Value 0.705 < 0.710
Total TP 194 > 191
Total TN 12215 < 12221
Total FP 86 > 79
Total FP CONTRA 12 < 17
Total FP INCONS 69 > 61
Total FP COMP 5 > 1
Total FN 92 < 95
P-value 0.000163747891751

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Afold and Alterna. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and Alterna).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and Alterna).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Afold and Alterna. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and Alterna).

^top





Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 194
Total TN 12215
Total FP 86
Total FP CONTRA 12
Total FP INCONS 69
Total FP COMP 5
Total FN 92
Total Scores
MCC 0.685
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.610 ± 0.216
Sensitivity 0.678
Positive Predictive Value 0.705
Nr of predictions 14

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KFC_A - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 228 8 1 7 0 8
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 6 0 5 1 7
2RP0_A - 0.76 0.71 0.83 5 110 1 0 1 0 2
2ZZN_D 0.91 0.91 0.91 20 962 3 2 0 1 2
3A2K_C 0.46 0.50 0.44 11 1083 14 3 11 0 11
3A3A_A 0.93 0.87 1.00 26 1474 0 0 0 0 4
3ADB_C - 0.85 0.85 0.85 28 1786 6 0 5 1 5
3GCA_A - -0.04 0.00 0.00 0 151 9 1 6 2 7
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3IWN_A 0.67 0.68 0.68 19 1444 9 1 8 0 9
3JYV_7 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 1088 23 4 19 0 20
3LA5_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 21 933 0 0 0 0 4
3NKB_B - 0.69 0.74 0.67 14 714 7 0 7 0 5
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4

^top



Performance of Alterna - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Alterna

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 191
Total TN 12221
Total FP 79
Total FP CONTRA 17
Total FP INCONS 61
Total FP COMP 1
Total FN 95
Total Scores
MCC 0.682
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.690 ± 0.155
Sensitivity 0.668
Positive Predictive Value 0.710
Nr of predictions 14

^top



2. Individual counts for Alterna [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KFC_A - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 231 0 0 0 0 3
2LC8_A 0.47 0.44 0.53 8 513 7 0 7 0 10
2RP0_A - 0.84 0.71 1.00 5 111 0 0 0 0 2
2ZZN_D 0.93 0.95 0.91 21 961 2 2 0 0 1
3A2K_C 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1082 14 3 11 0 10
3A3A_A 0.93 0.87 1.00 26 1474 0 0 0 0 4
3ADB_C - 0.63 0.64 0.64 21 1786 12 1 11 0 12
3GCA_A - 0.84 0.71 1.00 5 153 0 0 0 0 2
3IVN_B 0.81 0.78 0.86 18 882 3 2 1 0 5
3IWN_A 0.81 0.79 0.85 22 1446 5 1 3 1 6
3JYV_7 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 1089 22 4 18 0 20
3LA5_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 21 933 0 0 0 0 4
3NKB_B - 0.41 0.42 0.42 8 716 11 3 8 0 11
3RKF_A 0.82 0.79 0.86 19 844 3 1 2 0 5

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.