CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Carnac(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Afold & Carnac(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Afold Carnac(seed)
MCC 0.657 > 0.123
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.667 ± 0.186 > 0.042 ± 0.094
Sensitivity 0.664 > 0.015
Positive Predictive Value 0.659 < 1.000
Total TP 174 > 4
Total TN 21248 < 21508
Total FP 142 > 0
Total FP CONTRA 27 > 0
Total FP INCONS 63 > 0
Total FP COMP 52 > 0
Total FN 88 < 258
P-value 1.04628667909e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Afold and Carnac(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and Carnac(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and Carnac(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Afold and Carnac(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and Carnac(seed)).

^top





Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 174
Total TN 21248
Total FP 142
Total FP CONTRA 27
Total FP INCONS 63
Total FP COMP 52
Total FN 88
Total Scores
MCC 0.657
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.667 ± 0.186
Sensitivity 0.664
Positive Predictive Value 0.659
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 6 0 5 1 7
3A3A_A 0.93 0.87 1.00 26 1474 0 0 0 0 4
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3J3E_8 0.26 0.33 0.21 5 2718 31 6 13 12 10
3LA5_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 21 933 0 0 0 0 4
3NPB_A 0.82 0.73 0.93 27 2249 6 0 2 4 10
3O58_3 0.41 0.50 0.34 11 4732 38 6 15 17 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3W3S_B 0.55 0.55 0.56 18 1957 15 4 10 1 15
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4483 43 11 17 15 15
4ENB_A 0.81 0.73 0.92 11 460 3 0 1 2 4

^top



Performance of Carnac(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Carnac(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 4
Total TN 21508
Total FP 0
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 0
Total FP COMP 0
Total FN 258
Total Scores
MCC 0.123
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.042 ± 0.094
Sensitivity 0.015
Positive Predictive Value 1.000
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for Carnac(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.47 0.22 1.00 4 524 0 0 0 0 14
3A3A_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1500 0 0 0 0 30
3IVN_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 903 0 0 0 0 23
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2742 0 0 0 0 15
3LA5_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 954 0 0 0 0 25
3NPB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2278 0 0 0 0 37
3O58_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4764 0 0 0 0 22
3RKF_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 866 0 0 0 0 24
3W3S_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1989 0 0 0 0 33
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4516 0 0 0 0 20
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 472 0 0 0 0 15

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.