CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of McQFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Afold & McQFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Afold McQFold
MCC 0.473 > 0.358
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.521 ± 0.110 < 0.574 ± 0.137
Sensitivity 0.516 > 0.337
Positive Predictive Value 0.434 > 0.382
Total TP 1565 > 1021
Total TN 5397841 < 5398770
Total FP 2492 > 1808
Total FP CONTRA 618 > 351
Total FP INCONS 1421 > 1303
Total FP COMP 453 > 154
Total FN 1468 < 2012
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Afold and McQFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and McQFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and McQFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Afold and McQFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and McQFold).

^top





Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1565
Total TN 5397841
Total FP 2492
Total FP CONTRA 618
Total FP INCONS 1421
Total FP COMP 453
Total FN 1468
Total Scores
MCC 0.473
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.521 ± 0.110
Sensitivity 0.516
Positive Predictive Value 0.434
Nr of predictions 30

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KFC_A - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 228 8 1 7 0 8
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 6 0 5 1 7
2M58_A - 0.40 0.42 0.42 5 532 8 1 6 1 7
2RP0_A - 0.76 0.71 0.83 5 110 1 0 1 0 2
2WDL_A - 0.52 0.54 0.50 426 1444477 465 78 341 46 362
2ZZN_D 0.91 0.91 0.91 20 962 3 2 0 1 2
3A2K_C 0.46 0.50 0.44 11 1083 14 3 11 0 11
3A3A_A 0.93 0.87 1.00 26 1474 0 0 0 0 4
3ADB_C - 0.85 0.85 0.85 28 1786 6 0 5 1 5
3GCA_A - -0.04 0.00 0.00 0 151 9 1 6 2 7
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3IWN_A 0.67 0.68 0.68 19 1444 9 1 8 0 9
3IYQ_A 0.23 0.33 0.17 17 22339 97 47 37 13 34
3IZ4_A 0.52 0.57 0.48 54 25423 63 27 32 4 41
3J3E_8 0.26 0.33 0.21 5 2718 31 6 13 12 10
3JYV_7 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 1088 23 4 19 0 20
3JYX_5 - 0.34 0.44 0.27 210 1968232 793 260 300 233 271
3KIY_A - 0.53 0.55 0.51 430 1485031 475 81 338 56 356
3LA5_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 21 933 0 0 0 0 4
3NKB_B - 0.69 0.74 0.67 14 714 7 0 7 0 5
3NPB_A 0.82 0.73 0.93 27 2249 6 0 2 4 10
3O58_3 0.41 0.50 0.34 11 4732 38 6 15 17 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
3W3S_B 0.55 0.55 0.56 18 1957 15 4 10 1 15
3ZEX_B - 0.34 0.38 0.31 132 420926 337 77 217 43 214
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4483 43 11 17 15 15
4ATO_G - 0.38 0.43 0.38 3 212 6 5 0 1 4
4ENB_A 0.81 0.73 0.92 11 460 3 0 1 2 4
4JRC_A - 0.27 0.29 0.29 5 605 12 0 12 0 12

^top



Performance of McQFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for McQFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1021
Total TN 5398770
Total FP 1808
Total FP CONTRA 351
Total FP INCONS 1303
Total FP COMP 154
Total FN 2012
Total Scores
MCC 0.358
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.574 ± 0.137
Sensitivity 0.337
Positive Predictive Value 0.382
Nr of predictions 30

^top



2. Individual counts for McQFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KFC_A - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 231 0 0 0 0 3
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 5 1 4 0 7
2M58_A - 0.60 0.58 0.64 7 533 5 1 3 1 5
2RP0_A - 0.84 0.71 1.00 5 111 0 0 0 0 2
2WDL_A - 0.37 0.37 0.36 294 1444515 545 84 429 32 494
2ZZN_D 0.93 0.95 0.91 21 961 2 2 0 0 1
3A2K_C 0.98 0.95 1.00 21 1087 0 0 0 0 1
3A3A_A 0.97 0.93 1.00 28 1472 0 0 0 0 2
3ADB_C - 0.98 0.97 1.00 32 1787 1 0 0 1 1
3GCA_A - 0.84 0.71 1.00 5 153 0 0 0 0 2
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3IWN_A 0.21 0.21 0.24 6 1447 19 2 17 0 22
3IYQ_A 0.22 0.31 0.15 16 22335 100 45 44 11 35
3IZ4_A 0.46 0.46 0.47 44 25442 56 14 36 6 51
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2718 36 8 16 12 15
3JYV_7 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 1091 20 4 16 0 20
3JYX_5 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1969002 0 0 0 0 481
3KIY_A - 0.38 0.38 0.38 302 1485090 544 83 405 56 484
3LA5_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 21 933 0 0 0 0 4
3NKB_B - 0.42 0.42 0.44 8 717 10 2 8 0 11
3NPB_A 0.90 0.81 1.00 30 2248 5 0 0 5 7
3O58_3 0.30 0.36 0.25 8 4732 27 15 9 3 14
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3U4M_B - 0.95 0.91 1.00 20 1256 2 0 0 2 2
3W3S_B 0.49 0.45 0.54 15 1961 14 1 12 1 18
3ZEX_B - 0.12 0.14 0.12 47 420944 379 78 283 18 299
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.16 5 4484 33 11 16 6 15
4ATO_G - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 215 5 0 5 0 7
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4JRC_A - 0.97 0.94 1.00 16 606 0 0 0 0 1

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.