CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Afold & NanoFolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Afold NanoFolder
MCC 0.404 > 0.338
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.398 ± 0.129 < 0.400 ± 0.259
Sensitivity 0.444 > 0.438
Positive Predictive Value 0.381 > 0.276
Total TP 64 > 63
Total TN 12269 > 12209
Total FP 135 < 195
Total FP CONTRA 30 < 53
Total FP INCONS 74 < 112
Total FP COMP 31 > 30
Total FN 80 < 81
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Afold and NanoFolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and NanoFolder).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Afold and NanoFolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and NanoFolder).

^top





Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 64
Total TN 12269
Total FP 135
Total FP CONTRA 30
Total FP INCONS 74
Total FP COMP 31
Total FN 80
Total Scores
MCC 0.404
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.398 ± 0.129
Sensitivity 0.444
Positive Predictive Value 0.381
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 6 0 5 1 7
2M58_A - 0.40 0.42 0.42 5 532 8 1 6 1 7
3J3E_8 0.26 0.33 0.21 5 2718 31 6 13 12 10
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
3W3S_B 0.55 0.55 0.56 18 1957 15 4 10 1 15
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4483 43 11 17 15 15
4ATO_G - 0.38 0.43 0.38 3 212 6 5 0 1 4
4JRC_A - 0.27 0.29 0.29 5 605 12 0 12 0 12

^top



Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for NanoFolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 63
Total TN 12209
Total FP 195
Total FP CONTRA 53
Total FP INCONS 112
Total FP COMP 30
Total FN 81
Total Scores
MCC 0.338
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.400 ± 0.259
Sensitivity 0.438
Positive Predictive Value 0.276
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for NanoFolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.54 0.61 0.50 11 506 11 1 10 0 7
2M58_A - 0.45 0.58 0.37 7 525 13 6 6 1 5
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2707 47 11 24 12 15
3U4M_B - 0.77 0.91 0.67 20 1246 12 6 4 2 2
3W3S_B 0.18 0.21 0.18 7 1949 34 2 31 1 26
4A1C_2 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4469 61 18 29 14 20
4ATO_G - 0.72 1.00 0.54 7 207 6 6 0 0 0
4JRC_A - 0.56 0.65 0.50 11 600 11 3 8 0 6

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.