CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Afold & RNASampler(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Afold RNASampler(seed)
MCC 0.590 > 0.572
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.599 ± 0.250 > 0.535 ± 0.282
Sensitivity 0.622 > 0.492
Positive Predictive Value 0.569 < 0.674
Total TP 115 > 91
Total TN 17606 < 17673
Total FP 133 > 66
Total FP CONTRA 27 > 14
Total FP INCONS 60 > 30
Total FP COMP 46 > 22
Total FN 70 < 94
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Afold and RNASampler(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and RNASampler(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and RNASampler(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Afold and RNASampler(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and RNASampler(seed)).

^top





Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 115
Total TN 17606
Total FP 133
Total FP CONTRA 27
Total FP INCONS 60
Total FP COMP 46
Total FN 70
Total Scores
MCC 0.590
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.599 ± 0.250
Sensitivity 0.622
Positive Predictive Value 0.569
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 6 0 5 1 7
3A3A_A 0.93 0.87 1.00 26 1474 0 0 0 0 4
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3J3E_8 0.26 0.33 0.21 5 2718 31 6 13 12 10
3O58_3 0.41 0.50 0.34 11 4732 38 6 15 17 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3W3S_B 0.55 0.55 0.56 18 1957 15 4 10 1 15
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4483 43 11 17 15 15

^top



Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 91
Total TN 17673
Total FP 66
Total FP CONTRA 14
Total FP INCONS 30
Total FP COMP 22
Total FN 94
Total Scores
MCC 0.572
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.535 ± 0.282
Sensitivity 0.492
Positive Predictive Value 0.674
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 518 10 0 10 0 18
3A3A_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 18 1482 0 0 0 0 12
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3J3E_8 0.18 0.20 0.18 3 2725 22 5 9 8 12
3O58_3 0.54 0.50 0.58 11 4745 13 5 3 5 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3W3S_B 0.60 0.36 1.00 12 1977 1 0 0 1 21
4A1C_2 0.40 0.40 0.40 8 4496 20 4 8 8 12

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.