CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Afold & RNAwolf [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Afold RNAwolf
MCC 0.394 > 0.281
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.477 ± 0.156 > 0.421 ± 0.209
Sensitivity 0.429 > 0.293
Positive Predictive Value 0.363 > 0.271
Total TP 227 > 155
Total TN 434501 < 434554
Total FP 475 > 467
Total FP CONTRA 107 < 125
Total FP INCONS 292 < 293
Total FP COMP 76 > 49
Total FN 302 < 374
P-value 1.87872347734e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Afold and RNAwolf. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and RNAwolf).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Afold and RNAwolf. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and RNAwolf).

^top





Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 227
Total TN 434501
Total FP 475
Total FP CONTRA 107
Total FP INCONS 292
Total FP COMP 76
Total FN 302
Total Scores
MCC 0.394
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.477 ± 0.156
Sensitivity 0.429
Positive Predictive Value 0.363
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 6 0 5 1 7
2M58_A - 0.40 0.42 0.42 5 532 8 1 6 1 7
3J3E_8 0.26 0.33 0.21 5 2718 31 6 13 12 10
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
3W3S_B 0.55 0.55 0.56 18 1957 15 4 10 1 15
3ZEX_B - 0.34 0.38 0.31 132 420926 337 77 217 43 214
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4483 43 11 17 15 15
4ATO_G - 0.38 0.43 0.38 3 212 6 5 0 1 4
4ENB_A 0.81 0.73 0.92 11 460 3 0 1 2 4
4JRC_A - 0.27 0.29 0.29 5 605 12 0 12 0 12

^top



Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAwolf

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 155
Total TN 434554
Total FP 467
Total FP CONTRA 125
Total FP INCONS 293
Total FP COMP 49
Total FN 374
Total Scores
MCC 0.281
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.421 ± 0.209
Sensitivity 0.293
Positive Predictive Value 0.271
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAwolf [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.52 0.50 0.56 9 512 7 0 7 0 9
2M58_A - 0.60 0.58 0.64 7 533 4 1 3 0 5
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2719 37 6 17 14 15
3RKF_A 0.89 0.83 0.95 20 845 1 0 1 0 4
3U4M_B - 0.50 0.50 0.52 11 1255 12 1 9 2 11
3W3S_B 0.70 0.70 0.72 23 1957 10 0 9 1 10
3ZEX_B - 0.18 0.19 0.17 65 420964 343 98 225 20 281
4A1C_2 0.12 0.15 0.10 3 4487 38 12 14 12 17
4ATO_G - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 213 7 4 3 0 7
4ENB_A 0.45 0.40 0.55 6 461 5 1 4 0 9
4JRC_A - 0.71 0.65 0.79 11 608 3 2 1 0 6

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.