CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CMfinder(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASLOpt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CMfinder(20) & RNASLOpt [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CMfinder(20) RNASLOpt
MCC 0.580 > 0.542
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.564 ± 0.352 > 0.524 ± 0.436
Sensitivity 0.500 < 0.582
Positive Predictive Value 0.681 > 0.514
Total TP 49 < 57
Total TN 10820 > 10781
Total FP 26 < 86
Total FP CONTRA 12 < 25
Total FP INCONS 11 < 29
Total FP COMP 3 < 32
Total FN 49 > 41
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CMfinder(20) and RNASLOpt. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CMfinder(20) and RNASLOpt).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CMfinder(20) and RNASLOpt. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CMfinder(20) and RNASLOpt).

^top





Performance of CMfinder(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CMfinder(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 49
Total TN 10820
Total FP 26
Total FP CONTRA 12
Total FP INCONS 11
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 49
Total Scores
MCC 0.580
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.564 ± 0.352
Sensitivity 0.500
Positive Predictive Value 0.681
Nr of predictions 5

^top



2. Individual counts for CMfinder(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.84 0.76 0.94 16 1202 2 1 0 1 5
3J3D_C 0.81 0.79 0.83 15 950 3 3 0 0 4
3J3E_8 0.14 0.13 0.17 2 2730 10 3 7 0 13
3J3F_8 0.48 0.47 0.50 9 4743 11 5 4 2 10
4FRG_B 0.54 0.29 1.00 7 1195 0 0 0 0 17

^top



Performance of RNASLOpt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASLOpt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 57
Total TN 10781
Total FP 86
Total FP CONTRA 25
Total FP INCONS 29
Total FP COMP 32
Total FN 41
Total Scores
MCC 0.542
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.524 ± 0.436
Sensitivity 0.582
Positive Predictive Value 0.514
Nr of predictions 5

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASLOpt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.74 0.76 0.73 16 1197 7 3 3 1 5
3J3D_C 0.90 0.95 0.86 18 947 3 3 0 0 1
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2724 30 6 12 12 15
3J3F_8 0.39 0.47 0.32 9 4733 38 10 9 19 10
4FRG_B 0.60 0.58 0.64 14 1180 8 3 5 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.