CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CRWrnafold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CRWrnafold & MCFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CRWrnafold MCFold
MCC 0.459 > 0.434
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.482 ± 0.305 > 0.436 ± 0.229
Sensitivity 0.477 > 0.469
Positive Predictive Value 0.456 > 0.418
Total TP 62 > 61
Total TN 9096 > 9086
Total FP 95 < 110
Total FP CONTRA 23 > 15
Total FP INCONS 51 < 70
Total FP COMP 21 < 25
Total FN 68 < 69
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CRWrnafold and MCFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CRWrnafold and MCFold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CRWrnafold and MCFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CRWrnafold and MCFold).

^top





Performance of CRWrnafold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CRWrnafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 62
Total TN 9096
Total FP 95
Total FP CONTRA 23
Total FP INCONS 51
Total FP COMP 21
Total FN 68
Total Scores
MCC 0.459
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.482 ± 0.305
Sensitivity 0.477
Positive Predictive Value 0.456
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for CRWrnafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
3J0L_a - 0.39 0.36 0.44 4 402 6 3 2 1 7
3SD1_A 0.63 0.66 0.61 19 1502 12 6 6 0 10
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4483 44 8 20 16 15
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 2 0 0 2 4
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 2 0 0 2 4

^top



Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MCFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 61
Total TN 9086
Total FP 110
Total FP CONTRA 15
Total FP INCONS 70
Total FP COMP 25
Total FN 69
Total Scores
MCC 0.434
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.436 ± 0.229
Sensitivity 0.469
Positive Predictive Value 0.418
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for MCFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.44 0.44 0.47 8 511 10 0 9 1 10
3J0L_a - 0.14 0.18 0.15 2 398 13 1 10 2 9
3SD1_A 0.43 0.45 0.43 13 1503 17 1 16 0 16
3U4M_B - 0.74 0.77 0.71 17 1252 10 1 6 3 5
4A1C_2 0.18 0.25 0.14 5 4480 45 12 19 14 15
4ENB_A 0.78 0.73 0.85 11 459 4 0 2 2 4
4ENC_A 0.34 0.33 0.38 5 483 11 0 8 3 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.