CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Carnac(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of IPknot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Carnac(20) & IPknot [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Carnac(20) IPknot
MCC 0.585 > 0.536
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.475 ± 0.210 < 0.541 ± 0.166
Sensitivity 0.413 < 0.525
Positive Predictive Value 0.836 > 0.557
Total TP 107 < 136
Total TN 25458 > 25342
Total FP 27 < 145
Total FP CONTRA 7 < 37
Total FP INCONS 14 < 71
Total FP COMP 6 < 37
Total FN 152 > 123
P-value 1.39551335374e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Carnac(20) and IPknot. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Carnac(20) and IPknot).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Carnac(20) and IPknot).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Carnac(20) and IPknot. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Carnac(20) and IPknot).

^top





Performance of Carnac(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Carnac(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 107
Total TN 25458
Total FP 27
Total FP CONTRA 7
Total FP INCONS 14
Total FP COMP 6
Total FN 152
Total Scores
MCC 0.585
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.475 ± 0.210
Sensitivity 0.413
Positive Predictive Value 0.836
Nr of predictions 12

^top



2. Individual counts for Carnac(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.69 0.71 0.68 15 1197 8 1 6 1 6
3J3D_C 0.90 0.95 0.86 18 947 3 3 0 0 1
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2742 0 0 0 0 15
3J3F_8 0.61 0.37 1.00 7 4754 2 0 0 2 12
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.72 0.55 0.94 16 1516 1 0 1 0 13
3ZEX_C 0.37 0.21 0.67 6 5365 4 1 2 1 23
4A1C_2 0.42 0.25 0.71 5 4509 3 0 2 1 15
4AOB_A 0.59 0.48 0.74 14 1418 6 2 3 1 15
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 472 0 0 0 0 15
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 496 0 0 0 0 15
4FRG_B 0.50 0.25 1.00 6 1196 0 0 0 0 18

^top



Performance of IPknot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for IPknot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 136
Total TN 25342
Total FP 145
Total FP CONTRA 37
Total FP INCONS 71
Total FP COMP 37
Total FN 123
Total Scores
MCC 0.536
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.541 ± 0.166
Sensitivity 0.525
Positive Predictive Value 0.557
Nr of predictions 12

^top



2. Individual counts for IPknot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.54 0.57 0.52 12 1196 12 3 8 1 9
3J3D_C 0.52 0.53 0.53 10 949 9 3 6 0 9
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2723 25 5 14 6 15
3J3F_8 0.36 0.47 0.28 9 4729 40 11 12 17 10
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.74 0.69 0.80 20 1508 5 0 5 0 9
3ZEX_C 0.51 0.34 0.77 10 5361 7 1 2 4 19
4A1C_2 0.23 0.25 0.22 5 4493 26 8 10 8 15
4AOB_A 0.50 0.48 0.54 14 1411 13 3 9 1 15
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.59 0.53 0.67 8 484 4 0 4 0 7
4FRG_B 0.75 0.71 0.81 17 1181 4 3 1 0 7

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.