CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Carnac(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Carnac(20) & PPfold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Carnac(20) PPfold(seed)
MCC 0.585 > 0.073
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.475 ± 0.210 > 0.036 ± 0.043
Sensitivity 0.413 > 0.019
Positive Predictive Value 0.836 > 0.294
Total TP 107 > 5
Total TN 25458 < 25569
Total FP 27 < 77
Total FP CONTRA 7 > 0
Total FP INCONS 14 > 12
Total FP COMP 6 < 65
Total FN 152 < 254
P-value 1.98760236454e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Carnac(20) and PPfold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Carnac(20) and PPfold(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Carnac(20) and PPfold(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Carnac(20) and PPfold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Carnac(20) and PPfold(seed)).

^top





Performance of Carnac(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Carnac(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 107
Total TN 25458
Total FP 27
Total FP CONTRA 7
Total FP INCONS 14
Total FP COMP 6
Total FN 152
Total Scores
MCC 0.585
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.475 ± 0.210
Sensitivity 0.413
Positive Predictive Value 0.836
Nr of predictions 12

^top



2. Individual counts for Carnac(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.69 0.71 0.68 15 1197 8 1 6 1 6
3J3D_C 0.90 0.95 0.86 18 947 3 3 0 0 1
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2742 0 0 0 0 15
3J3F_8 0.61 0.37 1.00 7 4754 2 0 0 2 12
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.72 0.55 0.94 16 1516 1 0 1 0 13
3ZEX_C 0.37 0.21 0.67 6 5365 4 1 2 1 23
4A1C_2 0.42 0.25 0.71 5 4509 3 0 2 1 15
4AOB_A 0.59 0.48 0.74 14 1418 6 2 3 1 15
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 472 0 0 0 0 15
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 496 0 0 0 0 15
4FRG_B 0.50 0.25 1.00 6 1196 0 0 0 0 18

^top



Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 5
Total TN 25569
Total FP 77
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 12
Total FP COMP 65
Total FN 254
Total Scores
MCC 0.073
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.036 ± 0.043
Sensitivity 0.019
Positive Predictive Value 0.294
Nr of predictions 12

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1219 0 0 0 0 21
3J3D_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 968 0 0 0 0 19
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2742 6 0 0 6 15
3J3F_8 0.19 0.11 0.33 2 4755 24 0 4 20 17
3RKF_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 866 0 0 0 0 24
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1533 0 0 0 0 29
3ZEX_C 0.15 0.07 0.33 2 5368 24 0 4 20 27
4A1C_2 0.10 0.05 0.20 1 4511 23 0 4 19 19
4AOB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1437 0 0 0 0 29
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 472 0 0 0 0 15
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 496 0 0 0 0 15
4FRG_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1202 0 0 0 0 24

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.