CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Carnac(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of ProbKnot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Carnac(20) & ProbKnot [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Carnac(20) ProbKnot
MCC 0.583 > 0.562
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.502 ± 0.156 < 0.533 ± 0.131
Sensitivity 0.391 < 0.600
Positive Predictive Value 0.874 > 0.532
Total TP 181 < 278
Total TN 62797 > 62481
Total FP 38 < 328
Total FP CONTRA 11 < 92
Total FP INCONS 15 < 153
Total FP COMP 12 < 83
Total FN 282 > 185
P-value 3.54671126599e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Carnac(20) and ProbKnot. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Carnac(20) and ProbKnot).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Carnac(20) and ProbKnot).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Carnac(20) and ProbKnot. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Carnac(20) and ProbKnot).

^top





Performance of Carnac(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Carnac(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 181
Total TN 62797
Total FP 38
Total FP CONTRA 11
Total FP INCONS 15
Total FP COMP 12
Total FN 282
Total Scores
MCC 0.583
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.502 ± 0.156
Sensitivity 0.391
Positive Predictive Value 0.874
Nr of predictions 16

^top



2. Individual counts for Carnac(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3IZ4_A 0.52 0.31 0.88 29 25503 4 3 1 0 66
3J20_0 0.69 0.71 0.68 15 1197 8 1 6 1 6
3J3D_C 0.90 0.95 0.86 18 947 3 3 0 0 1
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2742 0 0 0 0 15
3J3F_8 0.61 0.37 1.00 7 4754 2 0 0 2 12
3NPB_A 0.46 0.22 1.00 8 2270 3 0 0 3 29
3O58_3 0.60 0.36 1.00 8 4756 1 0 0 1 14
3PDR_A 0.75 0.58 0.97 29 4810 3 1 0 2 21
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.72 0.55 0.94 16 1516 1 0 1 0 13
3ZEX_C 0.37 0.21 0.67 6 5365 4 1 2 1 23
4A1C_2 0.42 0.25 0.71 5 4509 3 0 2 1 15
4AOB_A 0.59 0.48 0.74 14 1418 6 2 3 1 15
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 472 0 0 0 0 15
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 496 0 0 0 0 15
4FRG_B 0.50 0.25 1.00 6 1196 0 0 0 0 18

^top



Performance of ProbKnot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ProbKnot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 278
Total TN 62481
Total FP 328
Total FP CONTRA 92
Total FP INCONS 153
Total FP COMP 83
Total FN 185
Total Scores
MCC 0.562
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.533 ± 0.131
Sensitivity 0.600
Positive Predictive Value 0.532
Nr of predictions 16

^top



2. Individual counts for ProbKnot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3IZ4_A 0.59 0.61 0.57 58 25435 49 17 26 6 37
3J20_0 0.54 0.57 0.52 12 1196 12 3 8 1 9
3J3D_C 0.46 0.53 0.42 10 944 14 6 8 0 9
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2718 37 6 18 13 15
3J3F_8 0.39 0.47 0.33 9 4734 38 9 9 20 10
3NPB_A 0.79 0.73 0.87 27 2247 9 0 4 5 10
3O58_3 0.38 0.50 0.29 11 4726 42 10 17 15 11
3PDR_A 0.88 0.92 0.85 46 4786 10 5 3 2 4
3RKF_A 0.87 0.83 0.91 20 844 2 2 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.66 0.69 0.65 20 1502 11 6 5 0 9
3ZEX_C 0.48 0.52 0.45 15 5341 22 4 14 4 14
4A1C_2 0.17 0.25 0.13 5 4477 49 13 21 15 15
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.81 0.73 0.92 11 460 1 1 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.52 0.53 0.53 8 481 8 0 7 1 7
4FRG_B 0.38 0.38 0.41 9 1180 13 6 7 0 15

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.