CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Carnac(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Carnac(20) & RDfolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Carnac(20) RDfolder
MCC 0.745 > 0.641
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.666 ± 0.209 > 0.633 ± 0.192
Sensitivity 0.619 > 0.585
Positive Predictive Value 0.908 > 0.718
Total TP 167 > 158
Total TN 12332 > 12296
Total FP 21 < 65
Total FP CONTRA 6 < 14
Total FP INCONS 11 < 48
Total FP COMP 4 > 3
Total FN 103 < 112
P-value 2.59578924681e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Carnac(20) and RDfolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Carnac(20) and RDfolder).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Carnac(20) and RDfolder).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Carnac(20) and RDfolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Carnac(20) and RDfolder).

^top





Performance of Carnac(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Carnac(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 167
Total TN 12332
Total FP 21
Total FP CONTRA 6
Total FP INCONS 11
Total FP COMP 4
Total FN 103
Total Scores
MCC 0.745
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.666 ± 0.209
Sensitivity 0.619
Positive Predictive Value 0.908
Nr of predictions 12

^top



2. Individual counts for Carnac(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3A2K_C 0.88 0.77 1.00 17 1091 0 0 0 0 5
3GX2_A 0.68 0.46 1.00 13 1436 0 0 0 0 15
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3J20_0 0.69 0.71 0.68 15 1197 8 1 6 1 6
3J3D_C 0.90 0.95 0.86 18 947 3 3 0 0 1
3JYV_7 0.81 0.70 0.93 14 1096 3 0 1 2 6
3LA5_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 21 933 0 0 0 0 4
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.72 0.55 0.94 16 1516 1 0 1 0 13
4AOB_A 0.59 0.48 0.74 14 1418 6 2 3 1 15
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 472 0 0 0 0 15
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 496 0 0 0 0 15

^top



Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RDfolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 158
Total TN 12296
Total FP 65
Total FP CONTRA 14
Total FP INCONS 48
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 112
Total Scores
MCC 0.641
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.633 ± 0.192
Sensitivity 0.585
Positive Predictive Value 0.718
Nr of predictions 12

^top



2. Individual counts for RDfolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3A2K_C 0.98 0.95 1.00 21 1087 0 0 0 0 1
3GX2_A 0.60 0.57 0.64 16 1424 10 2 7 1 12
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3J20_0 0.82 0.76 0.89 16 1201 3 1 1 1 5
3J3D_C 0.76 0.79 0.75 15 948 5 3 2 0 4
3JYV_7 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 1091 20 4 16 0 20
3LA5_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 21 933 0 0 0 0 4
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.35 0.24 0.54 7 1520 6 1 5 0 22
4AOB_A 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 1414 13 3 9 1 18
4ENB_A 0.48 0.40 0.60 6 462 4 0 4 0 9
4ENC_A 0.48 0.40 0.60 6 486 4 0 4 0 9

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.