CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Carnac(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Carnac(20) & RNASampler(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Carnac(20) RNASampler(seed)
MCC 0.644 > 0.576
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.567 ± 0.253 > 0.564 ± 0.217
Sensitivity 0.448 < 0.525
Positive Predictive Value 0.931 > 0.638
Total TP 81 < 95
Total TN 25372 > 25310
Total FP 11 < 88
Total FP CONTRA 1 < 21
Total FP INCONS 5 < 33
Total FP COMP 5 < 34
Total FN 100 > 86
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Carnac(20) and RNASampler(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Carnac(20) and RNASampler(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Carnac(20) and RNASampler(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Carnac(20) and RNASampler(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Carnac(20) and RNASampler(seed)).

^top





Performance of Carnac(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Carnac(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 81
Total TN 25372
Total FP 11
Total FP CONTRA 1
Total FP INCONS 5
Total FP COMP 5
Total FN 100
Total Scores
MCC 0.644
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.567 ± 0.253
Sensitivity 0.448
Positive Predictive Value 0.931
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for Carnac(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2742 0 0 0 0 15
3J3F_8 0.61 0.37 1.00 7 4754 2 0 0 2 12
3O58_3 0.60 0.36 1.00 8 4756 1 0 0 1 14
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.72 0.55 0.94 16 1516 1 0 1 0 13
3ZEX_C 0.37 0.21 0.67 6 5365 4 1 2 1 23
4A1C_2 0.42 0.25 0.71 5 4509 3 0 2 1 15

^top



Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 95
Total TN 25310
Total FP 88
Total FP CONTRA 21
Total FP INCONS 33
Total FP COMP 34
Total FN 86
Total Scores
MCC 0.576
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.564 ± 0.217
Sensitivity 0.525
Positive Predictive Value 0.638
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3J3E_8 0.18 0.20 0.18 3 2725 22 5 9 8 12
3J3F_8 0.47 0.47 0.47 9 4742 18 5 5 8 10
3O58_3 0.54 0.50 0.58 11 4745 13 5 3 5 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.72 0.55 0.94 16 1516 1 0 1 0 13
3ZEX_C 0.39 0.31 0.50 9 5356 14 2 7 5 20
4A1C_2 0.40 0.40 0.40 8 4496 20 4 8 8 12

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.