CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Carnac(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Carnac(seed) & NanoFolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Carnac(seed) NanoFolder
MCC 0.363 > 0.295
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.169 ± 0.278 < 0.324 ± 0.213
Sensitivity 0.133 < 0.382
Positive Predictive Value 1.000 > 0.241
Total TP 23 < 66
Total TN 17528 > 17277
Total FP 0 < 258
Total FP CONTRA 0 < 68
Total FP INCONS 0 < 140
Total FP COMP 0 < 50
Total FN 150 > 107
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Carnac(seed) and NanoFolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Carnac(seed) and NanoFolder).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Carnac(seed) and NanoFolder).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Carnac(seed) and NanoFolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Carnac(seed) and NanoFolder).

^top





Performance of Carnac(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Carnac(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 23
Total TN 17528
Total FP 0
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 0
Total FP COMP 0
Total FN 150
Total Scores
MCC 0.363
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.169 ± 0.278
Sensitivity 0.133
Positive Predictive Value 1.000
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for Carnac(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.47 0.22 1.00 4 524 0 0 0 0 14
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2742 0 0 0 0 15
3J3F_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4761 0 0 0 0 19
3W3S_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1989 0 0 0 0 33
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4516 0 0 0 0 20
4AOB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1437 0 0 0 0 29
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 496 0 0 0 0 15
4JF2_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 19 1063 0 0 0 0 5

^top



Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for NanoFolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 66
Total TN 17277
Total FP 258
Total FP CONTRA 68
Total FP INCONS 140
Total FP COMP 50
Total FN 107
Total Scores
MCC 0.295
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.324 ± 0.213
Sensitivity 0.382
Positive Predictive Value 0.241
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for NanoFolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.54 0.61 0.50 11 506 11 1 10 0 7
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2707 47 11 24 12 15
3J3F_8 0.30 0.47 0.19 9 4714 57 21 17 19 10
3W3S_B 0.18 0.21 0.18 7 1949 34 2 31 1 26
4A1C_2 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4469 61 18 29 14 20
4AOB_A 0.39 0.41 0.39 12 1406 20 4 15 1 17
4ENC_A 0.66 0.73 0.61 11 478 9 2 5 2 4
4JF2_A 0.55 0.67 0.47 16 1048 19 9 9 1 8

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.