CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidAlifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Alterna - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidAlifold(20) & Alterna [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidAlifold(20) Alterna
MCC 0.900 > 0.593
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.903 ± 0.051 > 0.591 ± 0.291
Sensitivity 0.836 > 0.596
Positive Predictive Value 0.973 > 0.607
Total TP 143 > 102
Total TN 7777 > 7756
Total FP 7 < 67
Total FP CONTRA 3 < 18
Total FP INCONS 1 < 48
Total FP COMP 3 > 1
Total FN 28 < 69
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidAlifold(20) and Alterna. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and Alterna).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and Alterna).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidAlifold(20) and Alterna. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and Alterna).

^top





Performance of CentroidAlifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 143
Total TN 7777
Total FP 7
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 1
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 28
Total Scores
MCC 0.900
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.903 ± 0.051
Sensitivity 0.836
Positive Predictive Value 0.973
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3A2K_C 0.98 0.95 1.00 21 1087 0 0 0 0 1
3GX2_A 0.92 0.86 1.00 24 1425 1 0 0 1 4
3IVN_B 0.86 0.83 0.90 19 882 2 2 0 0 4
3JYV_7 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 1092 2 0 0 2 1
3LA5_A 0.87 0.80 0.95 20 933 1 1 0 0 5
3RKF_A 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 848 0 0 0 0 6
3SD1_A 0.85 0.76 0.96 22 1510 1 0 1 0 7

^top



Performance of Alterna - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Alterna

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 102
Total TN 7756
Total FP 67
Total FP CONTRA 18
Total FP INCONS 48
Total FP COMP 1
Total FN 69
Total Scores
MCC 0.593
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.591 ± 0.291
Sensitivity 0.596
Positive Predictive Value 0.607
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for Alterna [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3A2K_C 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1082 14 3 11 0 10
3GX2_A 0.56 0.57 0.57 16 1421 13 4 8 1 12
3IVN_B 0.81 0.78 0.86 18 882 3 2 1 0 5
3JYV_7 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 1089 22 4 18 0 20
3LA5_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 21 933 0 0 0 0 4
3RKF_A 0.82 0.79 0.86 19 844 3 1 2 0 5
3SD1_A 0.55 0.55 0.57 16 1505 12 4 8 0 13

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.