CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidAlifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidAlifold(20) & Cylofold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidAlifold(20) Cylofold
MCC 0.845 > 0.752
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.819 ± 0.081 > 0.773 ± 0.172
Sensitivity 0.747 > 0.734
Positive Predictive Value 0.961 > 0.778
Total TP 171 > 168
Total TN 16651 > 16613
Total FP 14 < 62
Total FP CONTRA 3 < 19
Total FP INCONS 4 < 29
Total FP COMP 7 < 14
Total FN 58 < 61
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidAlifold(20) and Cylofold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and Cylofold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidAlifold(20) and Cylofold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and Cylofold).

^top





Performance of CentroidAlifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 171
Total TN 16651
Total FP 14
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 4
Total FP COMP 7
Total FN 58
Total Scores
MCC 0.845
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.819 ± 0.081
Sensitivity 0.747
Positive Predictive Value 0.961
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 2 1 0 1 1
3O58_3 0.64 0.45 0.91 10 4753 2 1 0 1 12
3PDR_A 0.92 0.90 0.94 45 4792 5 1 2 2 5
3RKF_A 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 848 0 0 0 0 6
3SD1_A 0.85 0.76 0.96 22 1510 1 0 1 0 7
4AOB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 23 1414 2 0 0 2 6
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.68 0.47 1.00 7 489 0 0 0 0 8
4FRG_B 0.81 0.71 0.94 17 1184 2 0 1 1 7

^top



Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 168
Total TN 16613
Total FP 62
Total FP CONTRA 19
Total FP INCONS 29
Total FP COMP 14
Total FN 61
Total Scores
MCC 0.752
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.773 ± 0.172
Sensitivity 0.734
Positive Predictive Value 0.778
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.74 0.76 0.73 16 1197 7 3 3 1 5
3O58_3 0.42 0.50 0.35 11 4733 30 9 11 10 11
3PDR_A 0.86 0.78 0.95 39 4799 4 1 1 2 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
4AOB_A 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 1414 13 3 9 1 18
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0
4FRG_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 21 1181 0 0 0 0 3

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.