CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of ContextFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidAlifold(seed) & ContextFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidAlifold(seed) ContextFold
MCC 0.806 > 0.766
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.657 ± 0.121 > 0.619 ± 0.143
Sensitivity 0.705 < 0.747
Positive Predictive Value 0.923 > 0.785
Total TP 530 < 562
Total TN 452106 > 451964
Total FP 126 < 248
Total FP CONTRA 17 < 61
Total FP INCONS 27 < 93
Total FP COMP 82 < 94
Total FN 222 > 190
P-value 2.48055519165e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) and ContextFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and ContextFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and ContextFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidAlifold(seed) and ContextFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and ContextFold).

^top





Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 530
Total TN 452106
Total FP 126
Total FP CONTRA 17
Total FP INCONS 27
Total FP COMP 82
Total FN 222
Total Scores
MCC 0.806
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.657 ± 0.121
Sensitivity 0.705
Positive Predictive Value 0.923
Nr of predictions 16

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 528 0 0 0 0 18
3J20_2 0.88 0.85 0.92 349 421988 102 9 22 71 63
3J20_0 0.53 0.29 1.00 6 1213 0 0 0 0 15
3J3D_C 0.56 0.32 1.00 6 962 0 0 0 0 13
3J3E_8 0.39 0.20 0.75 3 2738 1 1 0 0 12
3J3F_8 0.62 0.47 0.82 9 4750 4 2 0 2 10
3W1K_J 0.86 0.81 0.93 25 1651 2 1 1 0 6
3W3S_B 0.80 0.70 0.92 23 1964 4 0 2 2 10
3ZEX_C 0.56 0.34 0.91 10 5363 3 1 0 2 19
4A1C_2 0.60 0.40 0.89 8 4507 3 1 0 2 12
4AOB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 23 1414 2 0 0 2 6
4ENB_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 8 464 0 0 0 0 7
4ENC_A 0.73 0.53 1.00 8 488 0 0 0 0 7
4FRG_B 0.81 0.71 0.94 17 1184 2 0 1 1 7
4FRN_A 0.80 0.71 0.91 20 1826 2 1 1 0 8
4JF2_A 0.76 0.63 0.94 15 1066 1 1 0 0 9

^top



Performance of ContextFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 562
Total TN 451964
Total FP 248
Total FP CONTRA 61
Total FP INCONS 93
Total FP COMP 94
Total FN 190
Total Scores
MCC 0.766
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.619 ± 0.143
Sensitivity 0.747
Positive Predictive Value 0.785
Nr of predictions 16

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.58 0.56 0.63 10 512 6 0 6 0 8
3J20_2 0.89 0.88 0.89 362 421963 88 15 28 45 50
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 2 1 0 1 1
3J3D_C 0.79 0.79 0.79 15 949 4 3 1 0 4
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2722 29 12 8 9 15
3J3F_8 0.36 0.42 0.31 8 4735 32 9 9 14 11
3W1K_J 0.90 0.87 0.93 27 1649 2 1 1 0 4
3W3S_B 0.87 0.85 0.90 28 1958 4 0 3 1 5
3ZEX_C 0.44 0.41 0.48 12 5349 23 4 9 10 17
4A1C_2 0.26 0.25 0.28 5 4498 26 3 10 13 15
4AOB_A 0.62 0.59 0.68 17 1412 9 2 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6
4FRG_B 0.77 0.71 0.85 17 1182 3 2 1 0 7
4FRN_A 0.42 0.39 0.46 11 1824 13 6 7 0 17
4JF2_A 0.57 0.50 0.67 12 1064 6 2 4 0 12

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.