CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidAlifold(seed) & MCFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidAlifold(seed) MCFold
MCC 0.741 > 0.483
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.677 ± 0.096 > 0.478 ± 0.109
Sensitivity 0.579 > 0.530
Positive Predictive Value 0.954 > 0.452
Total TP 314 > 287
Total TN 44891 > 44585
Total FP 27 < 420
Total FP CONTRA 11 < 99
Total FP INCONS 4 < 249
Total FP COMP 12 < 72
Total FN 228 < 255
P-value 4.94031556815e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) and MCFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and MCFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and MCFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidAlifold(seed) and MCFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and MCFold).

^top





Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 314
Total TN 44891
Total FP 27
Total FP CONTRA 11
Total FP INCONS 4
Total FP COMP 12
Total FN 228
Total Scores
MCC 0.741
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.677 ± 0.096
Sensitivity 0.579
Positive Predictive Value 0.954
Nr of predictions 23

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 528 0 0 0 0 18
2ZZN_D 0.52 0.27 1.00 6 978 0 0 0 0 16
3A2K_C 0.52 0.27 1.00 6 1102 0 0 0 0 16
3A3A_A 0.95 0.90 1.00 27 1473 0 0 0 0 3
3GX2_A 0.92 0.86 1.00 24 1425 1 0 0 1 4
3IVN_B 0.86 0.83 0.90 19 882 2 2 0 0 4
3J20_0 0.53 0.29 1.00 6 1213 0 0 0 0 15
3J3D_C 0.56 0.32 1.00 6 962 0 0 0 0 13
3J3E_8 0.39 0.20 0.75 3 2738 1 1 0 0 12
3J3F_8 0.62 0.47 0.82 9 4750 4 2 0 2 10
3JYV_7 0.50 0.25 1.00 5 1106 1 0 0 1 15
3LA5_A 0.87 0.80 0.95 20 933 1 1 0 0 5
3O58_3 0.68 0.50 0.92 11 4752 2 1 0 1 11
3PDR_A 0.93 0.88 0.98 44 4795 3 0 1 2 6
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.85 0.76 0.96 22 1510 1 0 1 0 7
3ZEX_C 0.56 0.34 0.91 10 5363 3 1 0 2 19
4A1C_2 0.60 0.40 0.89 8 4507 3 1 0 2 12
4ENB_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 8 464 0 0 0 0 7
4ENC_A 0.73 0.53 1.00 8 488 0 0 0 0 7
4FRG_B 0.81 0.71 0.94 17 1184 2 0 1 1 7
4FRN_A 0.80 0.71 0.91 20 1826 2 1 1 0 8
4JF2_A 0.76 0.63 0.94 15 1066 1 1 0 0 9

^top



Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MCFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 287
Total TN 44585
Total FP 420
Total FP CONTRA 99
Total FP INCONS 249
Total FP COMP 72
Total FN 255
Total Scores
MCC 0.483
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.478 ± 0.109
Sensitivity 0.530
Positive Predictive Value 0.452
Nr of predictions 23

^top



2. Individual counts for MCFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.44 0.44 0.47 8 511 10 0 9 1 10
2ZZN_D 0.69 0.73 0.67 16 960 11 1 7 3 6
3A2K_C 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1082 14 3 11 0 10
3A3A_A 0.98 0.97 1.00 29 1471 0 0 0 0 1
3GX2_A 0.58 0.61 0.57 17 1419 15 1 12 2 11
3IVN_B 0.45 0.48 0.46 11 879 14 5 8 1 12
3J20_0 0.66 0.71 0.63 15 1195 11 3 6 2 6
3J3D_C 0.54 0.63 0.48 12 943 13 4 9 0 7
3J3E_8 0.15 0.20 0.12 3 2716 36 11 12 13 12
3J3F_8 0.14 0.21 0.10 4 4720 51 17 20 14 15
3JYV_7 0.25 0.30 0.24 6 1086 20 8 11 1 14
3LA5_A 0.44 0.44 0.48 11 931 12 2 10 0 14
3O58_3 0.28 0.36 0.22 8 4727 39 14 15 10 14
3PDR_A 0.78 0.80 0.77 40 4788 14 5 7 2 10
3RKF_A 0.89 0.88 0.91 21 843 3 0 2 1 3
3SD1_A 0.43 0.45 0.43 13 1503 17 1 16 0 16
3ZEX_C 0.30 0.34 0.27 10 5337 28 6 21 1 19
4A1C_2 0.18 0.25 0.14 5 4480 45 12 19 14 15
4ENB_A 0.78 0.73 0.85 11 459 4 0 2 2 4
4ENC_A 0.34 0.33 0.38 5 483 11 0 8 3 10
4FRG_B 0.35 0.38 0.35 9 1176 17 3 14 0 15
4FRN_A 0.09 0.11 0.10 3 1818 28 2 25 1 25
4JF2_A 0.74 0.75 0.75 18 1058 7 1 5 1 6

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.